BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Session AB 194 (Frazier) - High-occupancy toll lanes ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Version: July 2, 2015 |Policy Vote: T. & H. 10 - 0 | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Urgency: No |Mandate: No | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Hearing Date: August 17, 2015 |Consultant: Mark McKenzie | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. Bill Summary: AB 194 would authorize the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and regional transportation agencies to apply to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) to develop and operate high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or other toll facilities, as specified. Fiscal Impact: CTC costs of approximately $200,000 per application for due diligence reviews and approvals of project proposals. Costs to review proposals submitted by regional transportation agencies will be reimbursed by the applicant, but CTC would need additional resources for each proposal submitted by AB 194 (Frazier) Page 1 of ? Caltrans. (State Highway Account) Minor and absorbable CTC costs to revise guidelines and administer the program. (State Highway Account) Unknown costs to Caltrans and regional transportation agencies to develop and operate HOT lanes. The bill authorizes Caltrans and regional transportation agencies to retain up to three percent of toll revenues for administrative expenses related to the operation of the facilities. Unknown toll revenue gains for Caltrans and regional transportation agencies related to the operation of HOT lanes and other toll facilities. For illustrative purposes, HOT lanes administered by MTA generate approximately $17 million annually. Excess revenues must be used within the corridor from which it was generated. Background: HOT lanes allow single-occupancy vehicles to use designated High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes at certain times of the day for a fee. They are designed to accomplish four main goals: (1) increase the use of HOV lanes; (2) relieve traffic congestion in other lanes; (3) fund new transportation projects; and (4) test the concept of "value pricing programs," whereby the toll varies depending on the time of day and level of congestion. Another value-pricing model is express lanes, which are toll roads that may allow high-occupancy vehicles to access the lanes for free or at a reduced toll. Existing law authorizes the San Diego Association of Governments, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, and the Alameda County Transportation Commission to construct and operate HOT lanes. AB 1467 (Nunez), Ch. 32/2006, established a HOT lane demonstration program that authorized regional transportation entities to submit applications to the CTC until January 1, 2012 for the development and operation of HOT lanes. AB 1467 required the Legislature to select HOT lane projects by enacting legislation, and limited the authorization to four projects, two each in southern and northern California. The CTC's role in the demonstration program was limited to establishing eligibility criteria, determining whether a particular project is eligible, holding public hearings in both northern and southern California on each eligible application, AB 194 (Frazier) Page 2 of ? and submitting eligible applications to the Legislature for approval or rejection. The CTC subsequently approved HOT lane facilities in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles County, and Riverside County. Existing law requires toll revenues generated from HOT lanes and express toll lanes to be expended within the corridor of the managed lanes. Proposed Law: AB 194 provides general authority for Caltrans and regional transportation agencies to develop and operate HOT lanes or other toll facilities, including value pricing programs and exclusive or preferential lane facilities for public transit or freight, subject to review and approval by CTC. Specifically, this bill would: Require CTC to review and approve each application for toll facilities, and conduct at least one public hearing at or near the proposed facility. Require CTC to establish eligibility criteria to include, at a minimum, all of the following: o Demonstration that the proposed facility will improve the corridor's performance, as specified. o A requirement that the facility is contained in a regional transportation plan, regional transportation improvement program, or interregional transportation improvement program, as specified. o Evidence of cooperation between Caltrans and the relevant regional transportation agency. o A discussion of how the proposed facility meets statutory requirements. o A requirement that the proposed facility has received environmental clearance. Require CTC to establish guidelines for the development and operation of toll facilities with the following minimum requirements: o The development and operation of facilities must be a cooperative effort between Caltrans and the appropriate regional transportation agency, with the active participation of the California Highway Patrol, pursuant AB 194 (Frazier) Page 3 of ? to agreements. o The applicant entity is responsible for establishing, collecting, and administering tolls, and for paying for the maintenance of facilities from net toll revenue, as specified. o Toll revenues will be available to the applicant for direct expenses related to the maintenance, administration, and operation of the facilities, including toll collection and enforcement. Administrative expenses to operate facilities are limited to three percent of toll revenues, and excess revenues are to be used in the corridor from which it was generated, pursuant to an expenditure plan. o Authority to operate toll facilities does not preclude the construction of competing facilities, and the applicant is not entitled to compensation for a competing facility's adverse impact on toll revenue. Require a regional transportation agency applicant, but not Caltrans, to reimburse CTC for all costs and expenses incurred in processing the application. Authorize a regional transportation agency to issue bonds payable from toll revenues. Require a regional transportation agency to consult with relevant local transportation authorities and congestion management agencies and provide the opportunity to enter into an agreement related to the toll facility, prior to submitting an application. Specify that the authority to develop and operate toll facilities neither prohibits nor authorizes the conversion of any existing non-tolled lanes into tolled lanes, except that a high-occupancy vehicle lane may be converted to a HOT lane. Related Legislation: AB 914 (Brown) would authorize the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission to conduct, administer, and operate a value-pricing program on Interstate 10 and Interstate 15 in San Bernardino County. AB 914 was approved by this Committee on July 13, 2015, and is currently pending on the Senate Floor. SB 983 (Hernandez), which was held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee's Suspense File in 2014, would also have authorized Caltrans or any regional transportation agency to apply to the CTC to develop and operate HOT lanes. Although AB 194 (Frazier) Page 4 of ? that version of SB 983 was not heard by this Committee, the language was previously included in SB 1298 (Hernandez), which was approved by this Committee on May 23, 2014. Staff Comments: The existing statutes governing the state HOT lane demonstration program require CTC to establish eligibility criteria, review applications to determine eligibility, and hold public hearings on the HOT lane proposals. AB 194 would specify the minimum eligibility criteria and impose the additional duty of approving applications for new HOT lanes, which would require CTC to update program guidelines. As part of the approval process, CTC would need to analyze revenue and operational analyses submitted by applicants. CTC indicates that staffing responsibilities to update guidelines and to generally administer the program could be absorbed, but the Commission would need to contract with financial and technical consultants to conduct a robust review of proposals prior to approval at a cost of approximately $200,000 per application. The bill requires regional transportation agencies to reimburse CTC for all costs and expenses incurred in the processing of an application, but these costs would be borne by the State Highway Account for proposals submitted by Caltrans. -- END --