BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 202 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 8, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Roger Hernández, Chair AB 202 (Gonzalez) - As Amended April 6, 2015 SUBJECT: Professional sports teams: cheerleaders: employee status SUMMARY: Provides that specified professional sports "cheerleaders" shall be deemed to be employees for state employment law purposes. Specifically, this bill: 1)Provides that, notwithstanding any other law, for purposes of the provisions of state law that govern employment, a cheerleader that is utilized by a California-based professional sports team during its exhibitions or games shall be deemed to be an employee. 2)Defines "cheerleader" to mean an individual who performs acrobatics, dance or gymnastics exercises on a recurring basis. However, the term does not include an individual who is not otherwise affiliated with the sports team and is utilized no more than one time in a calendar year. 3)Defines "professional sports team" to mean a team at either a minor or major league level in the sport of baseball, basketball, football, ice hockey, or soccer. AB 202 Page 2 4)Defines "California-based team" to mean a team that plays a majority of its home games in California. 5)Provides that the professional sports team shall ensure that the cheerleader is classified and treated as an employee. FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown COMMENTS: This bill addresses an issue that has garnered significant media attention over the last year - the treatment of professional sports cheerleaders. A number of lawsuits (including one against the Oakland Raiders) have been filed recently alleging violations of employment laws - including minimum wage, overtime, meal and rest periods, and illegal deductions - regarding professional sports cheerleaders. Other claims have been made that such cheerleaders have been misclassified as independent contractors rather than employees, thereby depriving them of important employment law protections. As mentioned above, a lawsuit was filed in January of last year alleging a number of employment law violations against the Oakland Raiders. Similar lawsuits have reportedly been filed against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the New York Jets, the Buffalo Bills, the Cincinnati Bengals, and the National Football League itself. Brief Background on Employment Misclassification Employee misclassification has become a serious problem in the United States, and particularly in California. When companies misclassify workers as independent contractors instead of as AB 202 Page 3 employees, these workers do not receive worker protections, including minimum wages, overtime pay, and health and vacation benefits, to which they would otherwise be entitled. Standard employee protections such as anti-discrimination laws and safety regulations also do not apply to independent contractors. Additionally, businesses do not deduct taxes, 401(k), Social Security, or Medicare payments from the paychecks of independent contractors, which results in a loss of state tax income from the businesses as well as a potential loss of income from the individual worker who may not properly report income. Because employers do not pay unemployment taxes for independent contractors, workers who are misclassified cannot obtain unemployment benefits if they lose their jobs. A number of reports in the last several years have chronicled the societal consequences of and impacts upon American workers of misclassification of workers as independent contractors versus employees. The United States Government Accountability Office conducted a study of misclassification of workers as independent contractors and found that employee misclassification cost the United States government $2.72 billion in revenue from Social Security, unemployment and income taxes in 2006 alone. (GAO, Employee Misclassifications: Improved Outreach Could Help Ensure Proper Worker Classification, GAO-07-859T (May 8, 2007), pg. 1.) Similarly, in California EDD reported that the number of misclassified employees increased 54 percent from 2005 to 2007, reaching 15,751 workers in 2007. During this 3-year period, the EDD recovered a total of $111,956,556 in payroll tax assessments, $18,537,894 in labor code citations, and $40,348,667 in assessments on employment tax fraud cases. (See California Employment Development Department, Annual Report: Fraud Deterrence and Detection Activities, report to the California Legislature (June 2008)) A Daily Journal article reported on the recent increase in worker misclassification and one person interviewed for the article noted that worker AB 202 Page 4 misclassification is attractive to employers because they can cut their labor costs by up to 30 percent by moving to an independent contractor model. (Ho, Independent Contractor Status Raises IRS Eyebrows: Contractor Status is Cheaper for Employers; Some Workers are Crying Foul, Daily Journal (May 17, 2010).) These concerns led to the passage of SB 459 (Corbett) from 2011, which established significant civil penalties for the intentional misclassification "Statutory Employees" and Previous Legislation As discussed above, in general, most individuals are determined to be employees under common law, which involves evaluating a number of specific factors. However, a "statutory employee" is defined as an employee by law under a specific statute. For example, Unemployment Insurance Code Section 621 deems certain groups of workers to be employees for purposes of certain employment tax purposes. These "statutory employees" include corporate officers, specified agent/commission drivers, traveling salespersons, certain home workers, and certain artists and authors. AB 202 Page 5 AB 950 (John A. Pérez) of 2011 would have deemed port drayage drivers to be employees for employment law purposes, similar to the approach taken by this bill. AB 950 was moved to the Inactive File on the Assembly floor. Stated Need For The Bill According to the author, the widespread practice of worker misclassification has resulted in a failure to justly compensate cheerleaders. This bill will ensure that professional cheerleaders will no longer be misrepresented as independent contractors by statutorily defining them as "employees" entitled to the same legal rights and benefits as employees. The author states: "It takes a lot of time and hard work to be a cheerleader, including an initial financial investment along with a commitment to practice just in order to have an opportunity to professionally dance and cheer for a sports team. Cheerleaders are required to attend and participate in AB 202 Page 6 practices, mandatory rehearsals, fittings, preparations, drills, photo sessions, meetings, and workouts. Cheerleaders are required to finance their business expenditures, including travel and investment in their physical appearance by purchasing required cosmetics, in the normal course of their cheerleading duties. During a sporting event, professional cheerleaders are performing and cheering. It is a product of hours upon hours of rehearsing dance routines, gymnastics and stunts. Cheer athletes practice their routines at least 2 to 5 times a week. They must get physically fit in order to carry out intense dance routines and stunts in cheerleading. On game days, a cheerleader's performance can consist of motivating players along with a combination of dance and music, gymnastics and acrobatics. As frontline team ambassadors, they're valuable contributors that add significant value to the entertainment product and fan experience. Cheerleaders are featured prominently in advertising and game-day coverage, especially leading in and out of every commercial break on the nationally broadcasted television programs. Prior to each sports season, selected cheerleaders have training camps and practice, photo shoots and swimsuit calendars obligations. Throughout the year, they have non-game day annual responsibilities, such as guest appearances at schools, charity events, or conferences. These are all employee obligations imposed by an employer? AB 202 Page 7 ?After examining numerous factors, it's clear that a cheerleader's position constitutes an employee status. For instance, once cheerleaders are selected to work for a sports franchise, the control over their work time ends. The organization's management directs the set work hours, payment schedules, dress codes and standards for behavior, among other work conditions." This bill would establish statutory employment status for covered cheerleaders. This would not impact the application of protections that apply to cheerleaders prior to the passage of the bill nor impact prior claims or settlements under existing law or existing theories of liability. AB 202 Page 8 ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT Supporters argue that this bill will would clarify that a professional cheerleader is provided the same rights and benefits of an employee under state law and is not improperly misclassified as an independent contractor. As a result, professional sport cheerleaders would be guaranteed a legal wage for attending and participating in team practices, rehearsals, preparations, meetings and required workouts. In addition, they would also be covered for all required appearances at corporate, community and charity events. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support CA Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit Union CA Conference of Machinists California Employment Lawyers Association California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO AB 202 Page 9 California School Employees Association California Teamsters Public Affairs Council Consumer Attorneys of California Engineers & Scientists of California International Longshore & Warehouse Union Jockeys' Guild Professional & Technical Engineers UNITE-HERE Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by:Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091 AB 202 Page 10