BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE
                         Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair
                                2015 - 2016  Regular 

                              
          
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Bill No:  |AB 204                           |Hearing    |6/10/15  |
          |          |                                 |Date:      |         |
          |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------|
          |Author:   |O'Donnell                        |Tax Levy:  |No       |
          |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------|
          |Version:  |4/9/15                           |Fiscal:    |No       |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Consultant|Weinberger                                            |
          |:         |                                                      |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

                        OVERSIGHT BOARDS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY



          Prohibits oversights boards in Los Angeles County from being  
          consolidated into a single countywide oversight board unless a  
          successor agency adopts a resolution dissolving the board.


           Background and Existing Law

           Until 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed local  
          officials to set up redevelopment agencies (RDAs), prepare and  
          adopt redevelopment plans, and finance redevelopment activities.  
           Citing a significant State General Fund deficit, Governor  
          Brown's 2011-12 budget proposed eliminating RDAs and returning  
          billions of dollars of property tax revenues to schools, cities,  
          and counties to fund core services.  Among the statutory changes  
          that the Legislature adopted to implement the 2011-12 budget, AB  
          X1 26 (Blumenfield, 2011) dissolved all RDAs.  The California  
          Supreme Court's 2011 ruling in California Redevelopment  
          Association v. Matosantos upheld AB X1 26, but invalidated AB X1  
          27 (Blumenfield, 2011), which would have allowed most RDAs to  
          avoid dissolution.

          AB X1 26 established successor agencies to manage the process of  
          unwinding former RDAs' affairs.  With limited exceptions, the  
          city or county that created each former RDA now serves as that  
          RDA's successor agency.  Each successor agency has an oversight  
          board that is responsible for supervising it and approving its  







          AB 204 (O'Donnell) 4/9/15                               Page 2  
          of ?
          
          
          actions.  The Department of Finance (DOF) can review and request  
          reconsideration of an oversight board's decisions.

          Until July 1, 2016, each successor agency's seven-member  
          oversight board is comprised of:
                 One member appointed by the county board of supervisors.

                 One member appointed by the mayor for the city that  
               formed the former RDA.

                 One member appointed by the largest special district, by  
               property tax share, within the territorial jurisdiction of  
               the former RDA.

                 One member appointed either by the elected county  
               superintendent of education to represent schools or, if a  
               superintendent is appointed, by the county board of  
               education.

                 One member to represent community college districts, who  
               is appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community  
               Colleges.

                 One member of the public, who is appointed by the county  
               board of supervisors.

                 One member representing the employees of the former  
               redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor or chair of the  
               board of supervisors, from the recognized employee  
               organization representing the largest number of former  
               redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor  
               agency at the time, as specified. 

          On July 1, 2016, in each county in which there is more than one  
          oversight board, those oversight boards must be consolidated  
          into a single seven-member oversight board comprised of:
                 One member appointed by the county board of supervisors.

                 One member appointed by the city selection committee  
               established pursuant to a specified statute.

                 One member appointed by the independent special district  
               selection committee established pursuant to a specified  
               statute.








          AB 204 (O'Donnell) 4/9/15                               Page 3  
          of ?
          
          

                 One member appointed either by the elected county  
               superintendent of education to represent schools or, if  
               superintendent is appointed, by the county board of  
               education.

                 One member appointed by the Chancellor of the California  
               Community Colleges to represent community college districts  
               in the county.

                 One member of the public appointed by the county board  
               of supervisors.

                 One member appointed by the recognized employee  
               organization representing the largest number of successor  
               agency employees in the county.

          Local officials in Los Angeles County worry that consolidating  
          the county's 71 oversight boards into a single countywide  
          oversight board will place overwhelming administrative burdens  
          on that oversight board.  They want the Legislature to prevent  
          all oversight boards in Los Angeles County from being  
          consolidated into a single board next year.


           Proposed Law

           Assembly Bill 204 requires that an oversight board within Los  
          Angeles County must continue to independently operate until its  
          successor agency adopts a resolution dissolving its oversight  
          board and the oversight board approves that resolution.  AB 204  
          specifies that a successor agency's oversight board ceases to  
          exist after a successor agency resolution to dissolve its  
          oversight board is adopted and approved.  The bill specifies  
          that, after a successor agency's oversight board is dissolved,  
          the successor agency will be overseen by the oversight board  
          established pursuant to the statute creating a single countywide  
          oversight board on July 1, 2016.

          AB 204 makes additional technical and conforming changes to the  
          statutes governing successor agencies' oversight boards.


           State Revenue Impact








          AB 204 (O'Donnell) 4/9/15                               Page 4  
          of ?
          
          

           No estimate.


           Comments

           1.  Purpose of the bill  .  Stakeholders in the redevelopment  
          dissolution process in Los Angeles County worry about the  
          massive volume of work that would be handled by a single  
          countywide oversight board after state law consolidates the  
          county's 71 oversight boards next year.  Officials note that the  
          countywide oversight board will not have the same level of  
          detailed, institutional knowledge about any particular successor  
          agency's operations that individual oversight boards currently  
          possess.  This may make it difficult for the countywide board to  
          act expeditiously in approving some successor agencies' actions.  
           Administrative gridlock and slow response times will make it  
          difficult to complete the complex property disposition  
          functions, financial transactions, and tax distributions that  
          are a needed to smoothly unwind former RDAs' affairs in Los  
          Angeles County.  By preventing all 71 success or agencies from  
          simultaneously becoming answerable to a single oversight board,  
          AB 204 avoids placing a potentially counterproductive burden on  
          the redevelopment wind-down process in Los Angeles County.

          2.   Discretionary for all agencies  ?  Not every successor agency  
          in Los Angeles County still has complicated business left to  
          complete and a countywide board would doubtless be able to  
          administer the wind-down process of several successor agencies  
          starting immediately.  However, AB 204 leaves it up to each  
          successor agency to decide when it is appropriate to consolidate  
          its oversight board into the single countywide board.  The  
          Committee may wish to consider amending AB 204 to ensure that  
          the oversight board consolidation process in Los Angeles is not  
          unnecessarily delayed past the time at which the countywide  
          board could be reasonably expected to take on an individual  
          oversight board's additional workload.  For example, the bill  
          could leave the dissolution of an individual oversight board up  
          to the discretion of only those successor agencies that have  
          pending property disposition transactions or those that meet  
          other criteria demonstrating that they would place a significant  
          administrative burden on the countywide oversight board.

          3.  Let's be clear  .  One change that AB 204 makes to the laws  








          AB 204 (O'Donnell) 4/9/15                               Page 5  
          of ?
          
          
          governing oversight boards is to delete the word "only" from the  
          current statutory requirement that, on and after July 1, 2016,  
          each county must have "only one oversight board" appointed in a  
          specified manner.  This change could lead to confusion over  
          whether any counties other than Los Angeles can form a  
          countywide oversight board without consolidating all of the  
          other oversight boards within the county.  To avoid any  
          misinterpretations, the Committee may wish to consider amending  
          AB 204 to clarify that Los Angeles County is the only county  
          that is being exempted from the July 1, 2016 date by which all  
          other counties must have only one oversight board for all  
          successor agencies within a county.

          4.   Trailer bill alternative ?  After Governor Brown revised his  
          proposed State Budget last month, the Department of Finance  
          released draft language of a budget trailer bill which includes  
          an alternative approach to restructuring Los Angeles County's  
          oversight boards.  Under the proposal released by the Department  
          of Finance, on July 1, 2016, the 71 oversight boards in Los  
          Angeles County would be consolidated into five oversight boards  
          that would be responsible for successor agencies within each of  
          Los Angeles' five county supervisor districts.

          5.   Special legislation  .  The California Constitution prohibits  
          special legislation when a general law can apply (Article IV,  
          §16).  AB 204 contains findings and declarations explaining the  
          need for legislation that applies only to Los Angeles County. 


           Assembly Actions

           Assembly Local Government Committee:           9-0
          Assembly Housing & Community Development Committee:  6-0
          Assembly Floor:                              78-0


















          AB 204 (O'Donnell) 4/9/15                               Page 6  
          of ?
          
          
           

          Support and  
          Opposition   (6/4/15)


           Support  :  American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees, AFL-CIO; American Federation of State, County and  
          Municipal Employees, District Council 36; Cities of Alhambra,  
          Bell Gardens, Cerritos, Downey, Lakewood, Long Beach.  
          Montebello, Paramount, Santa Monica, Signal Hill, Torrance,  
          Whittier; County of Los Angeles; Downtown Long Beach Associates;  
          Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti;  Los Angeles County Division,  
          League of California Cities.


           Opposition  :  Unknown.



                                      -- END --