BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 231 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 231 (Eggman) As Amended May 26, 2015 Majority vote -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: | 77-0 |(April 30, |SENATE: | 39-0 |(September 2, | | | |2015) | | |2015) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: PUB. S. SUMMARY: Requires that an inmate who is released on postrelease community supervision (PRCS) for a stalking offense not be returned to a location within 35 miles of the victim's actual residence or place of employment, if specified criteria are satisfied. The Senate amendments make a non-substantive correction. EXISTING LAW: 1)Requires that, subject to specified exceptions, an inmate who is released on parole shall be returned to the county that was the last legal residence of the inmate prior to his or her incarceration. 2)States an inmate who is released on parole shall not be returned AB 231 Page 2 to a location within 35 miles of the actual residence of a victim of, or a witness to, specified violent felonies or a felony in which the defendant inflicts great bodily injury on any person, if the victim or witness has requested additional distance in the placement of the inmate on parole, and if Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) or the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) finds that there is a need to protect the life, safety, or well-being of a victim or witness. 3)Provides an inmate who is released on parole for a violation of lewd and lascivious acts or continuous sexual abuse of a child, whom the CDCR determines poses a high risk to the public, shall not be placed or reside, for the duration of his or her parole, within one-half mile of any public or private school. 4)Requires, an inmate who is released on parole for an offense involving stalking shall not be returned to a location within 35 miles of the victim's actual residence or place of employment if the victim or witness has requested additional distance in the placement of the inmate on parole, and if the BPH or the CDCR finds that there is a need to protect the life, safety, or wellbeing of the victim. 5)Provides an exception allowing an inmate may be returned to another county if that would be in the best interests of the public. If BPH or CDCR decides on a return to another county, it shall place its reasons in writing in the parolee's permanent record. In making its decision, the paroling authority shall consider, among others, the following factors, giving the greatest weight to the protection of the victim and the safety of the community: a) The need to protect the life or safety of a victim, the parolee, a witness, or any other person; b) Public concern that would reduce the chance that the inmate's parole would be successfully completed; AB 231 Page 3 c) The verified existence of a work offer, or an educational or vocational training program; d) The existence of family in another county with whom the inmate has maintained strong ties and whose support would increase the chance that the inmate's parole would be successfully completed; or e) The lack of necessary outpatient treatment programs for parolees receiving treatment as mentally disordered offenders. 6)Requires all persons paroled before October 1, 2011 to remain under the supervision of the CDCR until jurisdiction is terminated by operation of law or until parole is discharged. 7)Requires the following persons released from prison on or after October 1, 2011, be subject to parole under the supervision of CDCR: a) A person who committed a "serious" felony, as specified; b) A person who committed a violent felony, as specified; c) A person serving a Three-Strikes sentence; d) A high risk sex offender; e) A mentally disordered offender (MDO); f) A person required to register as a sex offender and subject to a parole term exceeding three years at the time of the commission of the offense for which he or she is being released; and, AB 231 Page 4 g) A person subject to lifetime parole at the time of the commission of the offense for which he or she is being released. 8)Requires all other offenders released from prison on or after October 1, 2011, to be placed on PRCS under the supervision of a county agency, such as a probation department. 9)Limits the term for PRCS to three years. 10)Provides for intermediate sanctions for violating the terms of PRCS, including "flash incarceration" for up to 10 days. 11)Specifies that if PRCS is revoked, the offender may be incarcerated in the county jail for a period not to exceed 180 days for each custodial sanction. 12)Prohibits the return of an offender who violates conditions of PRCS to prison. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill: 1)Provided that an inmate who is released on postrelease community supervision for a stalking offense shall not be returned to a location within 35 miles of the victim's actual residence or place of employment if the victim has requested additional distance in the placement of the inmate. 2)Stated that if an inmate who is released on postrelease community supervision in his or her county of last legal residence in compliance with the victim's request for additional distance in the placement, the supervising county agency may transfer the inmate to another county upon approval of the receiving county. 3)Made other conforming changes. AB 231 Page 5 FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, ongoing future minor to moderate costs, potentially in excess of $50,000 (General Fund*) statewide, to county probation departments for the placement of inmates released on PRCS. According to CDCR data, approximately 150 inmates per year are released on PRCS for a stalking offense. Based on historical data, about 50% of inmates released on parole for a stalking offense have required relocation services. *Proposition 30 (2012) exempts the State from mandate reimbursement for realigned programs, however, legislation that has an overall effect of increasing the costs already borne by a local agency for realigned programs, including public safety services such as managing local jails and providing supervision of juvenile and adult offenders, apply to local agencies only to the extent that the State provides annual funding for the cost increase. To the extent the provisions of this measure increase the workload and overall costs of county probation departments could result in the provision of additional General Fund support from the State. COMMENTS: According to the author, "Current law states that a victim of a stalking offense may request that a parolee, who is released under state supervision, not be returned to a location within 35 miles of the victim's actual residence or place of employment if the CDCR determines there is a need to protect the life, safety, or well-being of the victim. The need for this bill arises because current statute was not updated to include offenders released under local jurisdiction on PRCS when this category of supervised persons was created pursuant to the Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011. This bill will ensure that victims of stalking can request that their stalkers, upon release from state prison, not be returned to a location within 35 miles of their home or place of employment, regardless of whether the offender is under state or local supervision." AB 231 Page 6 Analysis Prepared by: Gregory Pagan / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744 FN: 0001816