BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                       AB 252


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          252 (Holden)


          As Amended  June 2, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                |Noes                  |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------|
          |Education       |6-1   |O'Donnell, Kim,     |Chávez                |
          |                |      |McCarty, Santiago,  |                      |
          |                |      |Thurmond, Weber     |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------|
          |Appropriations  |13-4  |Gomez, Bonta,       |Bigelow, Gallagher,   |
          |                |      |Calderon, Chang,    |Jones, Wagner         |
          |                |      |Daly, Eggman,       |                      |
          |                |      |Eduardo Garcia,     |                      |
          |                |      |Gordon, Holden,     |                      |
          |                |      |Quirk, Rendon,      |                      |
          |                |      |Weber, Wood         |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Establishes the Advanced Placement (AP) STEM Access  
          Grant Program through July 1, 2021, to be administered by the  
          California Department of Education (CDE) for purposes of awarding  
          funds to cover the costs associated with a high school  








                                                                       AB 252


                                                                      Page  2





          establishing or expanding its AP Science, Technology, Engineering  
          and Mathematics (STEM) curriculum.  Specifically, this bill: 


          1)Establishes the AP STEM Access Grant Program Account in the  
            State Treasury and authorizes funds in the account to be used to  
            fund grants and to administer the program.
          2)Authorizes grant funds to be used for one-time costs of  
            establishing or expanding AP STEM courses, as defined, including  
            but not limited to, professional development, instructional  
            materials, and laboratory materials and supplies.


          3)Requires the grant amount to be determined based on the cost of  
            the type of AP course in the STEM curriculum, not to exceed  
            $8,000 per grant application.  Specifies terms and conditions  
            necessary to apply for the grant funding and provides first  
            priority shall be given to applicants with no AP courses in  
            STEM. 


          4)Authorizes a school district to apply for a maximum of one grant  
            per high school and ten grants per district if the high school  
            or school district either does not offer AP courses in the STEM  
            curriculum or the AP STEM courses are oversubscribed; and the  
            high school has identified pupils from populations that are  
            underrepresented in STEM courses and who have demonstrated they  
            have high potential to be successful in one or more AP courses  
            in the STEM curriculum, using any means it deems appropriate,  
            including, but not limited to, a pupil's score on the  
            preliminary SAT.


          5)Requires the CDE to give first priority to applicants with no AP  
            courses in the STEM curriculum.


          6)Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI), who is  
            encouraged to work with the College Board, to submit a report to  








                                                                       AB 252


                                                                      Page  3





            the Legislature on the effectiveness of the program no later  
            than July 1, 2021.


          7)Provides that the grant program will be established only to the  
            extent that moneys are available for its purpose from any state  
            or nonstate source.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1)Unknown Proposition 98 (1988)/General Fund cost pressure in the  
            hundreds of thousands. Program requirements would be contingent  
            upon state, federal or non-state funding; however, no specific  
            funding source has been identified.  Actual costs will depend on  
            the amount of the total grant award.  For illustration, assuming  
            100 schools qualify for the maximum grant award of $8,000; costs  
            would be in excess of $800,000.  


          2)Administrative costs of approximately $400,000 to the California  
            Department of Education (CDE) to review and approve  
            applications, provide technical assistance and write an  
            evaluation of the program.  CDE would likely contract with a  
            statewide evaluator to evaluate the effectiveness of the  
            programs. 


          COMMENTS:  Advanced Placement (AP).  The Advanced Placement (AP)  
          Program was established over 40 years ago by the College Board, a  
          national nonprofit organization.  The AP Program consists of  
          college-level courses in 31 subject areas, including the seven  
          subject areas identified by this bill. 



          The AP Program provides incentives for public high schools in  








                                                                       AB 252


                                                                      Page  4





          California to provide access to rigorous, college-level courses  
          for interested and prepared students.  With such programs,  
          students may pursue college-level work while still in secondary  
          school and receive college credit, advanced academic standing, or  
          both. 


          AP courses are recognized by virtually all public and private  
          universities.  Successful completion of AP courses, and the  
          related tests, can greatly help students in the very competitive  
          process of university admission. 

          AP courses prepare students for AP exams, which are administered  
          by the College Board and scored on a five-point scale as follows:



          1)Extremely well qualified - 5

          2)Well qualified - 4

          3)Qualified - 3

          4)Possibly qualified - 2

          5)No recommendation - 1
          Most colleges and universities require a score of at least 3 or 4  
          for college credit.


          STEM.  STEM is an acronym standing for "science, technology,  
          engineering, and mathematics."  Advocates of a STEM curriculum  
          argue that a STEM education is critical to enabling the United  
          States to be competitive and retain economic and technological  
          leadership in the global economy of the 21st Century.  A 2009  
          report from the Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy  
          at Sacramento State University called "Technical Difficulties:   
          Meeting California's Workforce Needs in STEM Fields" contains the  
          following key findings:








                                                                       AB 252


                                                                      Page  5







          1)STEM jobs are vital to the California economy, but a shortage of  
            skilled workers may decrease the state's strength in STEM  
            fields.
          2)Employment demand in STEM fields is growing faster than  
            employment demand in non-STEM fields.


          3)The supply of STEM-educated workers is not keeping pace with  
            demand.


          4)Not all STEM graduates become STEM employees.


          Need for diversity.  The above-mentioned report also concluded  
          that increasing STEM achievement by underrepresented groups is  
          necessary to ensure that there are enough STEM workers.  There is  
          evidence, however, that female and ethnic minority students have  
          fewer opportunities to enroll in STEM courses.  In a survey of  
          chemists and chemical engineers conducted by the Bayer Corporation  
          ("Bayer Facts of Science Education XIV:  Female and Minority  
          Chemists and Chemical Engineers Speak about Diversity and  
          Underrepresentation in STEM," March 2010), 75% of respondents  
          agreed that lack of quality science and math education programs in  
          poorer school districts is a top cause of underrepresentation in  
          STEM, and 66% agreed that stereotypes that say STEM is not for  
          girls or minorities is a top cause of underrepresentation in STEM.  
           The Bayer survey also reports that 77% of respondents say  
          "significant numbers of women and underrepresented minorities are  
          missing from the United States STEM workforce today because they  
          were not identified, encouraged or nurtured to pursue STEM studies  
          early on."  Although the Bayer survey was restricted to chemists  
          and chemical engineers, it is reasonable to assume that its  
          findings apply across the STEM curriculum.











                                                                       AB 252


                                                                      Page  6






          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
          Rick Pratt / ED. / (916) 319-2087  FN: 0000869