BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                       AB 260


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          260 (Lopez)


          As Amended  April 7, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                 |Noes                 |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------|
          |Human Services  |5-0   |Chu, Calderon,       |                     |
          |                |      |Lopez, Mark Stone,   |                     |
          |                |      |Thurmond             |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------|
          |Judiciary       |10-0  |Mark Stone, Wagner,  |                     |
          |                |      |Alejo, Chau, Chiu,   |                     |
          |                |      |Gallagher, Cristina  |                     |
          |                |      |Garcia, Holden,      |                     |
          |                |      |Maienschein,         |                     |
          |                |      |O'Donnell            |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0  |Gomez, Bigelow,      |                     |
          |                |      |Bonta, Calderon,     |                     |
          |                |      |Chang, Daly, Eggman, |                     |
          |                |      |Gallagher,           |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |Eduardo Garcia,      |                     |
          |                |      |Gordon, Holden,      |                     |








                                                                       AB 260


                                                                      Page  2





          |                |      |Jones, Quirk,        |                     |
          |                |      |Rendon, Wagner,      |                     |
          |                |      |Weber, Wood          |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Provides support and protections for parenting foster  
          youth.  Specifically, this bill:
          1)Provides the legislative declaration that a child who has one or  
            both parents adjudged a dependent of the court, as specified,  
            shall not be considered at risk of abuse or neglect solely based  
            on the parent's or parents' age, dependent status, or foster  
            care status, or solely based on information regarding the  
            parent's or parents' placement history, past behaviors, or  
            health or mental health diagnoses prior to the pregnancy.   
            Allows such information to be taken into account when  
            considering whether other factors exist that place the child at  
            risk of abuse or neglect.
          2)Requires all of the following to apply for a child with one or  
            more minor dependent parents, as specified:


             a)   Nullifies the stipulation that reunification services need  
               not be provided in instances where there has been a  
               termination of reunification services for, or permanent  
               severance of, parental rights over any siblings or half  
               siblings, as specified, unless other specified circumstances  
               removing the necessity for reunification services also exist;  
               and
             b)   Requires a party seeking foster care placement of, or  
               termination of parental rights over, a child with one or both  
               parents who were minors when the child was born to  
               demonstrate that reasonable efforts using available  
               resources, as specified, were made to provide services aimed  
               at preventing the removal of the child and that these efforts  
               were unsuccessful.









                                                                       AB 260


                                                                      Page  3






          3)Requires the clerk of the superior court to maintain court files  
            and records regarding a dependent parent of a child who is the  
            subject of a dependency petition separately from the files and  
            records regarding that child.
          4)Allows a dependent parent's dependency court records to be  
            disclosed to the county in the child's dependency proceedings,  
            but disallows these records from being admitted as evidence  
            unless required by a court order stating that these files and  
            records contain information materially relevant to the case, as  
            specified.


          5)Requires foster care placements for minor parents and nonminor  
            dependent parents and their children to support the preservation  
            of the family unit and provide services, as specified, to  
            prevent, whenever possible, the filing of a petition to declare  
            the child a dependent of the juvenile court.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, this bill will result in unknown, but potentially  
          significant costs in excess of $150,000 to the courts for  
          increased administrative workload and additional hearings.  For  
          example, if 10% of female foster youth likely to have children are  
          impacted by this bill, the estimated cost to conduct court  
          hearings would be $210,000 (350 cases multiplied by approximately  
          $600/hour (estimated court hearing cost) multiplied by one hour).   
          Attorney fees and administrative costs for records management  
          would be additional.       


          COMMENTS: 


          Reunification services:  The court may order reunification  
          services for parents who have had a child removed when it is  
          determined that reunification with the family would ultimately  
          benefit the child.  These services can encompass a range of  








                                                                       AB 260


                                                                      Page  4





          supports, including parenting classes, substance abuse treatment,  
          family therapy, home visiting, among others, aimed at responding  
          to the needs of the child and the parents.  Depending on the  
          child's age, reunification services can be offered for between six  
          months (for children under the age of three) and 12 months (for  
          children ages three and older).  Extensions for certain  
          circumstances may be granted if there is a substantial probability  
          that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or  
          her parents.  If the court finds that any one of a number of  
          situations exists - such as evidence of a parent's history of  
          abuse or neglect resulting in having a child removed from his or  
          her custody - reunification services need not be provided.  A  
          parent's past history of terminated reunification services, or  
          permanent severance of parental rights, for a sibling or  
          half-sibling of a child currently removed from his or her physical  
          custody could also constitute a reason for not providing  
          reunification services.


          Pregnant and parenting foster youth:  As of January 1, 2015, there  
          were 62,898 children and youth in foster care in California.   
          Little information exists on the number of pregnant and parenting  
          youth in the foster system (although this will change as of  
          Federal Fiscal Year 2016, when the federal Preventing Sex  
          Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act (H.R. 4980) will  
          require states to track data on pregnant and parenting foster  
          youth). 


          While comprehensive data on the size of the state's population of  
          pregnant and parenting foster youth is currently lacking, evidence  
          of higher pregnancy and parenting rates for foster youth exists.   
          For example, recent research connecting Child Protective Services  
          (CPS) data with birth records in California was able to link  
          approximately 1.5 million California birth records (from 2000 to  
          2010) to 1 million CPS records.  Using this linked data,  
          researchers found that, of girls in foster care at the age of 17,  
          more than one-quarter of them had given birth at least once during  
          their teens.  Of girls in foster care who had given birth at least  








                                                                       AB 260


                                                                      Page  5





          once before the age of 18, over one-third had more than one birth  
          in their teens.  These findings were corroborated by a much  
          smaller, more in-depth study that interviewed over 700 17-year-old  
          foster youth and former foster youth in California.  This study  
          found that just over one-fourth of respondents had ever been  
          pregnant; 30% of those who had been pregnant had been pregnant  
          more than one time.


          Need for this bill:  Parenting can present any young person with a  
          number of significant challenges.  Those challenges are often  
          greater for pregnant and parenting foster youth.  According to the  
          author, "It is vital that we initiate a culture shift around the  
          way we think about parenting foster youth.  Instead of making it  
          more difficult for these youth or overlooking their unique needs  
          as parents living within the dependency system, we should be  
          supporting them in their goals to create a healthy family in the  
          same way we support their goals for higher education,  
          career/professional, or any other permanency outcomes our system  
          seeks to achieve for them.  By working to break the cycle of  
          foster care, we can ensure our foster youth can succeed while also  
          preserving the lives of children in their family unit rather than  
          settling for additional, unnecessary entrances into the system for  
          those children."


          This bill will help support pregnant and parenting foster youth to  
          preserve their families by discouraging the inappropriate use of  
          outdated and/or irrelevant information as a means for removing a  
          child from the care of a parenting foster youth.  Moreover, this  
          bill recognizes the fact that a parenting foster youth may have  
          more than one child and removes barriers to reunification services  
          for these youth that can exist for parents who have histories of  
          interaction with the child welfare system related to siblings or  
          half siblings of their child.  Instead of preventing a parenting  
          foster youth from accessing services to help them maintain their  
          family, the goal of this bill is to ensure that these youth have  
          exactly those services and supports that will help them, and their  
          child(ren), remain an intact family unit.  Additionally, this bill  








                                                                       AB 260


                                                                      Page  6





          requires foster placements for parenting youth to be supportive of  
          family maintenance for those youth and their child(ren).




          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
                          Daphne Hunt / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089  FN:  
          0000591