BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, Chair 2015-2016 Regular Session AB 264 (Dahle) Version: June 8, 2015 Hearing Date: July 14, 2015 Fiscal: Yes Urgency: No TH SUBJECT Farm Products: Processors: Produce Dealers: Seeds DESCRIPTION This bill would expand the California Seed Law (CSL), which authorizes the Secretary of Food and Agriculture (Secretary) to develop methods and procedures for the conciliation, mediation, or arbitration of disputes concerning label statements, advertisements, or other disputes regarding the quality or performance of seed, to also make those methods and procedures applicable to financial disputes between seed dealers and growers. This bill would provide, pursuant to the CSL, that every producer of a flower, agricultural, or vegetable seed that sells seed that is grown by him or her to any seed dealer under contract, has a lien upon that product and upon all processed or manufactured forms of that product for his or her labor, care, and expense in growing and harvesting that product. This bill would exclude flower, agricultural, or vegetable seeds from the definition of farm products subject to regulation, licensing, and enforcement by the Market Enforcement Branch of the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA). BACKGROUND The California Seed Law (CSL) was enacted in 1967 to ensure that agricultural and vegetable seed is properly and accurately identified when labeled and sold in the marketplace. Under the CSL, the Secretary is empowered to make regulations concerning seed quality, including germination standards for different types of seeds. Seed quality is analyzed through the Seed AB 264 (Dahle) Page 2 of ? Services program administered by CDFA. In general, the CSL is locally enforced by county agricultural commissioners who enter into cooperative agreements with the Secretary to maintain specified statewide compliance levels on all seed sold in the county. In return, county agricultural commissioners receive annual subvention payments for expenses incurred in association with approved enforcement activities. Commissioners and CDFA are empowered to issue "stop-sale" orders to the owner or custodian of any lot of agricultural or vegetable seed that violates provisions of the CSL, as well as prevent the movement or disposal of seeds subject to a "stop-sale" order, or declare non-compliant seeds a nuisance and order them seized. (Food & Agr. Code Sec. 52251 et seq.) The CSL also empowers the Secretary to establish methods and procedures for the conciliation, mediation, or arbitration of disputes between labelers and any other person concerning conformance with label statements, advertisements, or other disputes regarding the quality or performance of seed. The CSL requires such disputes to go through these methods and procedures as a prerequisite to pursuing other dispute resolution mechanisms, such as litigation in court. The CSL also requires seed labels to provide the purchaser with notice of the requirement to follow the conciliation, mediation, or arbitration procedures, as well as of the consequences for failing to follow those procedures. Funding for carrying out programs under the CSL is supported through industry seed assessments and registration fees, which are administered by CDFA. Every labeler of agricultural or vegetable seed offered for sale in California, or any person who sells that seed in this state, must annually register as a seed labeler and pay an annual fee. In addition, those who are registered seed labelers must also pay an assessment based on their annual dollar volume in sales. This bill would expand the CSL's dispute resolution procedures to include disputes concerning financial terms of seed sales or the lack of payment by a seed dealer to a grower. This bill would recognize that growers of seeds have a lien upon that product and on processed or manufactured forms of that product for the grower's labor, care, and expense in growing and harvesting the seed. This bill would also remove flower, agricultural, or vegetable seeds from the definition of farm products subject to regulation, licensing, and enforcement under AB 264 (Dahle) Page 3 of ? the Produce Dealers and Processors Act. CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW Existing federal law , the Federal Seed Act, makes it unlawful for any person to transport or to deliver for transportation in interstate commerce agricultural seeds with untruthful labels. (7 U.S.C. Sec. 1551 et seq.) Existing law , the California Seed Law, regulates the quality, performance, and labeling of flower, agricultural, and vegetable seeds sold or offered for sale in the state. (Food & Agr. Code Sec. 52251 et seq.) Existing law requires every labeler of agricultural or vegetable seed offered for sale in this state, or any person who sells that seed in this state, to annually register with the Secretary to obtain authorization to sell agricultural or vegetable seed before engaging in this activity, except as specified. (Food & Agr. Code Sec. 52351.) Existing law requires each container of agricultural seed that is for sale or sold within this state for sowing purposes to bear upon it specified information, including the commonly accepted name of the kind, kind and variety, or kind and type of each agricultural seed component in excess of 5 percent of the whole, the lot number or other lot identification, the percentage by weight of all weed seeds, and the name and approximate number of each kind of restricted noxious weed seed per pound. (Food & Agr. Code Sec. 52352.) Existing law empowers the Secretary of Food and Agriculture to establish methods and procedures for the conciliation, mediation, or arbitration of disputes between labelers and any persons concerning conformance with label statements, advertisements, or other disputes regarding the quality or performance of seed. These methods and procedures are a mandatory prerequisite to pursuing other dispute resolution mechanisms, including, but not limited to, litigation. (Food & Agr. Code Sec. 52332.) Existing law requires all seed, except as specified, to conspicuously bear upon the label adequate notice of the requirement to follow the conciliation, mediation, or arbitration procedures governing disputes between labelers and AB 264 (Dahle) Page 4 of ? another person, as authorized by the CSL, and the consequences of failing to follow those procedures. (Food & Agr. Code Sec. 52456.) Existing law , the Produce Dealers and Processors Act, separately regulates the sale of farm products, including flower or agricultural or vegetable seed purchased from a seed producer. (Food & Agr. Code Sec. 56101 et seq.) This bill would empower the Secretary, in addition to other authorities granted in the CSL, the power to establish methods and procedures for the conciliation, mediation, or arbitration of disputes between labelers and other persons concerning financial terms or the lack of payment by a dealer to a grower. This bill would provide that if a proceeding for the conciliation, mediation, or arbitration of a dispute between a dealer and a grower is commenced for conformance with the financial terms by a dealer to a grower, and the decision in the proceeding is in favor of the grower, the decision may include a provision requiring compensation to the grower for the estimated value of the seed production services a grower provides to a dealer. This bill would provide that if a dealer fails to comply with the financial obligations of a judgment rendered in a conciliation, mediation, or arbitration proceeding between a dealer and a grower following the conclusion of all appeals in the proceeding, the Secretary may revoke the dealer's license and prevent the dealer from renewing his or her license until the time the financial obligation is fulfilled. This bill would provide that every producer of a flower, agricultural, or vegetable seed that sells seed that is grown by him or her, when the seed was purchased or supplied by the grower and not supplied by the dealer or an independent third party who paid for the seed, to any seed dealer under contract, express or implied, in addition to all other rights and remedies that are provided for by law, has a lien upon that product and upon all processed or manufactured forms of that product for his or her labor, care, and expense in growing and harvesting that product, as specified. This bill would remove flower or agricultural or vegetable seed purchased from a producer from the scope of "farm products" AB 264 (Dahle) Page 5 of ? subject to regulation under the Produce Dealers and Processors Act. COMMENT 1.Stated need for the bill The author writes: The California Seed Law was enacted in 1967 to ensure that agricultural and vegetable seed is properly and accurately identified on the product label and that it meets quality standards including germination, variety and species. [Separately,] [e]xisting law governing [the California Department of Food and Agriculture's (CDFA)] Market Enforcement Branch [MEB] provides . . . regulatory and fee authority over all "farm Products" which includes a broad definition of agricultural products [such as agricultural and vegetable seeds]. Over the past few years there has been ever increasing confusion over which seed transactions are subject to MEB oversight, requiring dealers to obtain licenses and regulated by the act and which seeds are exempt. MEB staff have been citing seed dealers and threatening them with fines unless they register as produce dealers under the MEB. AB 264 will harmonize all seed transactions and clarify they are governed solely by the [California Seed Law] and applicable federal law and not subject to the oversight and fees of the [MEB]. Funding for this program is entirely supported through industry seed assessments and registration fees and is administered by CDFA. The California Seed Association, sponsor, states: Transactions of seed in California are governed by the federal seed law and the California Seed [Law]. These are highly regulated transactions that were developed to protect farmers and retail purchasers of seed from unscrupulous seed sellers and to standardize seed labels. Since seeds and the genes they carry are difficult to discern from one another, the seed labeling law provides clear guidance on what needs to be stated on the label and how these products should be marketed . . . AB 264 (Dahle) Page 6 of ? This legislation will harmonize all seed transactions and clarify that they are governed by the state and federal seed acts and their dispute resolution process. By eliminating the confusing language in the [Produce Dealers and Processors Act] that exempts the vast majority of seed transactions from governance under that program, this bill will subject all seed transactions to one dispute resolution standard, one set of regulations and one registration program. 2.Regulation under the Produce Dealers and Processors Act In addition to the California Seed Law (CSL), seed transactions in California are also currently regulated under the Produce Dealers and Processors Act (Food & Agr. Code Sec. 56101 et seq.). That act regulates "farm products," which includes "every agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, and vegetable product of the soil, poultry and poultry products, livestock products and livestock not for immediate slaughter, bees and apiary products, hay, dried beans, honey, and cut flowers." (Food & Agr. Code Sec. 56109.) Like the CSL, the Produce Dealers and Processors Act requires "any person engaged in the business of buying, receiving on consignment, soliciting for sale on commission, or negotiating the sale of farm products from a licensee or producer for resale to be licensed." (Food & Agr. Code Sec. 56181.) Unlike the CSL, the licensure provisions of this act authorize CDFA, through its Market Enforcement Branch (MEB), to investigate a person's criminal and financial records prior to issuing a license, or to require a licensee to post a surety bond or other "irrevocable guarantee of the obligations of the licensee" under specified circumstances that raise doubts about the financial solvency of a licensee, or for those licensees who repeatedly violate the act's provisions. (Food & Agr. Code Secs. 56133.5, 56183.5, 56252.2) The act also contains dispute resolution procedures administered by CDFA that parallel those contained in the CSL, and allows CDFA to take disciplinary action against licensees who violate the act's provisions. (Food & Agr. Code Secs. 56185, 56382.5.) Together, these provisions help ensure that farm product merchants are both financially solvent and reputable, and that marketplace participants are able to seek redress when transaction agreements are not honored. This bill would remove seed merchants from the scope of the Produce Dealers and Processors Act, and would instead regulate these merchants solely under the CSL. While the CSL has AB 264 (Dahle) Page 7 of ? historically focused on product standards and labeling, not financial disputes and merchant fitness, this bill would expand the CSL to address these new topics. This bill would empower the Secretary, under the CSL, to create dispute resolution processes for disputes concerning financial terms or the lack of payment by a dealer to a grower, would authorize the Secretary to require a seed dealer to compensate a grower for the value of the seed production services a grower provides to a dealer in certain situations, and would empower the Secretary to revoke a dealer's license and prevent the dealer from renewing the license so long as certain financial obligations of the dealer remain unfulfilled. According to the author, these changes "will help streamline seed transactions, while still protecting buyers, sellers, and the public," noting that "the seed industry is a highly regulated industry with both state and federal laws, and that only a small number of transactions in California fall under MEB rules" under current practice. While this bill would not incorporate all of the Produce Dealers and Processors Act's protections into the CSL, such as the ability to investigate criminal histories and financial solvency during the licensure process, or the ability to require dealers to post surety bonds as a condition of licensure, this bill would offer a new protection for growers in the form of a "producer's lien." This bill would provide that every seed producer that sells seed grown by him or her, except that grown from seed provided by a dealer or third party, has a lien upon that product and upon all processed or manufactured forms of that product for his or her labor, care, and expense in growing and harvesting that product. This new lien authority would complement an existing lien authority producers of farm products (including seeds) have against processors under Section 55631 of the Food and Agricultural Code. Coupled with the ability for a grower to recover compensation for the estimated value of the seed production services a grower provides to a dealer under the Secretary's dispute resolution procedures, including the value of labor, care, and expense that went into growing and harvesting a product regardless of the source of its seed, these changes to the CSL help ensure that the interests of seed growers are protected in the marketplace. 3.Amendments Taken in the Senate Agriculture Committee The author accepted the following amendments when this bill was heard in the Senate Agriculture Committee on June 30, 2015, with AB 264 (Dahle) Page 8 of ? the understanding that they would be taken in this Committee. These amendments make technical corrections to the bill and enlarge the scope of relief available to growers under the Secretary's dispute resolution procedures. Author's Amendments : On page 4, line 7, replace "dealer" with "dealer, including but not limited to labor, care, and expense in growing and harvesting that product" On page 4, lines 12 and 13, replace "license" with "registration" Support : None Known Opposition : None Known HISTORY Source : California Seed Association Related Pending Legislation : None Known Prior Legislation : SB 1399 (Galgiani, Ch. 277, Stats. 2014) extended the operation and repeal dates for provisions of the California Seed Law, including an annual county subvention for enforcement activities necessary to carry out these provisions, until July 1, 2019, and January 1, 2020, respectively. This bill eliminated certain provisions establishing a method of calculating apportionments based on units of activity, and instead requires the amount of the subvention designated to each participating county to be established in a memorandum of understanding between the county agricultural commissioner and the Secretary of the Department of Food and Agriculture, in consultation with the Seed Advisory Board. AB 2240 (Ma, Ch. 382, Stats. 2010), among other things, raised certain fees and deleted an outdated fee structure and reporting provisions of the Department of Food and Agriculture's Market Enforcement Branch. Specifically, this bill increased from $60 AB 264 (Dahle) Page 9 of ? to $100, the filing fee paid by a grower or licensee, with a complaint not subject to certain federal laws, seeking resolution of the complaint, increased from $35 to $55, the license fee paid by agents of produce dealers and food processors, and increased from $100 to $136, the fee paid by produce dealers and food processors. AB 3024 (Assembly Committee on Agriculture, Ch. 459, Stats. 2004) granted the Secretary of the Department of Food and Agriculture the discretion to determine what enforcement activities are to be conducted by county agricultural commissioners and the California Department of Food and Agriculture, regarding enforcement of the California Seed Law. Prior Vote : Senate Agriculture Committee (Ayes 3, Noes 0) Assembly Floor (Ayes 80, Noes 0) Assembly Appropriations Committee (Ayes 17, Noes 0) Assembly Agriculture Committee (Ayes 10, Noes 0) **************