BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        AB 266|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  AB 266
          Author:   Bonta (D), Cooley (D), Jones-Sawyer (D), and Lackey  
                    (R), et al.
          Amended:  9/4/15 in Senate
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE:  8-1, 7/15/15
           AYES:  Hernandez, Hall, Mitchell, Monning, Nielsen, Pan, Roth,  
            Wolk
           NOES:  Nguyen

           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE:  4-0, 7/15/15
           AYES:  Hertzberg, Beall, Hernandez, Moorlach
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Nguyen, Lara, Pavley

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  5-0, 8/27/15
           AYES:  Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bates, Nielsen

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  62-8, 6/4/15 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Medical cannabis


          SOURCE:    Author


          DIGEST:  This bill states the Legislature's intent to enact  
          legislation that would enact a comprehensive regulatory  
          framework for medical marijuana in the state, makes the  
          enactment of the bill contingent on the enactment of SB 643  
          (McGuire) and adds repeated acts of excessive recommending of  
          cannabis to patients to the list of types of cases the Medical  
          Board of California (MBC) shall prioritize its investigative and  
          prosecutorial resources for.








                                                                     AB 266  
                                                                    Page  2







          Senate Floor Amendments of 9/4/15 add repeated acts of clearly  
          excessive recommending of cannabis to patients for medical  
          purposes, or repeated acts of recommending cannabis to patients  
          for medical purposes without a good faith prior examination of  
          the patient and a medical reason for the recommendation, to the  
          list of types of cases the MBC shall prioritize its  
          investigative and prosecutorial resources for in order to ensure  
          that physicians and surgeons representing the greatest threat of  
          harm are identified and disciplined expeditiously.


          ANALYSIS: 

          Existing law:

           1) Licenses and regulates physicians and surgeons under the  
             Medical Practice Act (Act) by the MBC within the DCA.  (BPC §  
             2000 et seq.)

           2) Provides that the MBC shall take action against a physician  
             who is charged with unprofessional conduct, as specified.   
             (BPC § 2234)

           3) Requires the MBC to prioritize its investigative and  
             prosecutorial resources to ensure that physicians  
             representing the greatest threat of harm are identified and  
             disciplined expeditiously and includes in that prioritization  
             list:  "Repeated acts of clearly excessive prescribing,  
             furnishing, or administering of controlled substances, or  
             repeated acts of prescribing, dispensing, or furnishing of  
             controlled substances without a good faith prior examination  
             of the patient and medical reason therefor."  (BPC § 2220.05)

           4) Provides that, notwithstanding any other provision of law,  
             no physician in California shall be punished, or denied any  
             right or privilege, for having recommended marijuana to a  
             patient for medical purposes.  (HSC § 11362.5 (c))









                                                                     AB 266  
                                                                    Page  3



           5) Prohibits, under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (CUA), an  
             initiative measure, prosecution for the possession or  
             cultivation of marijuana of a patient or a patient's primary  
             caregiver who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the  
             personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or  
             oral recommendation or approval of a physician.  (Health and  
             Safety Code (HSC) § 11362.5)

           6) Declares that the purposes of the CUA are:

              a)    To ensure that seriously ill Californians have the  
                right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes  
                where that medical use is deemed appropriate and has been  
                recommended by a physician who has determined that the  
                person's health would benefit from the use of marijuana in  
                the treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain,  
                spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any other  
                illness for which marijuana provides relief.

              b)    To ensure that patients and their primary caregivers  
                who obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes upon the  
                recommendation of a physician, are not subject to criminal  
                prosecution or sanction. 

              c)    To encourage the Federal and State governments to  
                implement a plan to provide for the safe and affordable  
                distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need  
                of marijuana.  (HSC § 11362.5 (b)(1)(A) to (C))

           1) Establishes the Medical Marijuana Program Act, which exempts  
             qualified patients who hold an identification card issued  
             pursuant to the Medical Marijuana Program and the caregivers  
             of those persons, from certain state criminal sanctions  
             related to the possession, cultivation, transportation,  
             processing, or use of limited amounts of marijuana, as  
             specified.  (HSC § 11362.7 et seq.)

           2) Requires the California Department of Public Health to  
             establish and maintain a voluntary program for qualified  
             patients to apply for identification cards, and county health  
             departments to issue identification cards to qualified  
             patients and their caregivers.  Provides that persons with  








                                                                     AB 266  
                                                                    Page  4



             valid identification cards shall not be subject to arrest for  
             possession, transportation, delivery, or cultivation of  
             marijuana, absent evidence of fraud.  (HSC §§11362.71 (a),  
             (b) and (e))

           3) Makes it a misdemeanor offense to, among other things,   
             fraudulently represent a medical condition or provide any  
             material misinformation to a physician, health department  
             designee, or to law enforcement, for the purpose or falsely  
             obtaining an identification card; fraudulently use any  
             person's identification card in order to acquire, possess,  
             cultivate, transport, use, produce, or distribute marijuana;  
             counterfeit, tamper with, or fraudulently produce an  
             identification card; breach any confidentiality requirements  
             pertaining to an identification card program.  
           (HSC § 11362.81) 

           4) Lists marijuana as a hallucinogenic substance in Schedule I  
             of the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act.  (HSC §  
             11054 (d))

          This bill:

           1) States the Legislature's intent to enact legislation that  
             would enact a comprehensive regulatory framework for medical  
             marijuana in the state.

           2) Makes the enactment of the bill contingent on the enactment  
             of SB 643 (McGuire).

           3) Adds repeated acts of clearly excessive recommending of  
             cannabis to patients for medical purposes, or repeated acts  
             of recommending cannabis to patients for medical purposes  
             without a good faith prior examination of the patient and a  
             medical reason for the recommendation, to the list of types  
             of cases the MBC shall prioritize its investigative and  
             prosecutorial resources for in order to ensure that  
             physicians and surgeons representing the greatest threat of  
             harm are identified and disciplined expeditiously.

          Background









                                                                     AB 266  
                                                                    Page  5




          The Compassionate Use Act and SB 420.  In 1996, voters approved  
          Proposition 215, known as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996.   
          The CUA allowed patients and primary caregivers to obtain and  
          use medical marijuana, as recommended by a physician and  
          prohibited physicians from being punished or denied any right or  
          privilege for making a medical marijuana recommendation to a  
          patient.  In 2003, SB 420 (Vasconcellos, Chapter 875) allowed  
          patients and primary caregivers to collectively and  
          cooperatively cultivate medical marijuana and established a  
          medical marijuana card program for patients to use on a  
          voluntary basis.  However, since the passage of Proposition 215  
          and SB 420, the state has not adopted a framework to provide for  
          appropriate licensure and regulation of medical marijuana.  In  
          addition, despite the CUA and SB 420, marijuana is still illegal  
          under state and federal law.  

          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No


          SUPPORT:   (Verified9/4/15)


          None received


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified9/4/15)


          None received

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  62-8, 6/4/15
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Baker, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown,  
            Burke, Chang, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Dababneh, Daly, Dodd,  
            Eggman, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gomez,  
            Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Roger Hernández,  
            Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low,  
            Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin,  
            Nazarian, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon,  
            Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond,  
            Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins








                                                                     AB 266  
                                                                    Page  6



          NOES:  Travis Allen, Bigelow, Brough, Chávez, Cooper, Gallagher,  
            Gatto, Irwin
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Calderon, Campos, Dahle, Frazier, Beth  
            Gaines, Harper, Jones, Kim, Obernolte, Ridley-Thomas

          Prepared by:Sarah Mason / B., P. & E.D. / (916) 651-4104
          9/11/15 13:42:22


                                   ****  END  ****