BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 271


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 15, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          271 (Obernolte) - As Amended April 7, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Human Services                 |Vote:|7 - 0        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY: This bill allows alternative payment programs and child  
          care providers to maintain records electronically.   
          Specifically, this bill:


          1)Allows alternative payment programs and child care providers  
            to: 








                                                                     AB 271


                                                                    Page  2








             a)   Maintain records electronically regardless of whether  
               the original documents were created electronically. 



             b)   Use electronic signatures that may be a marking that is  
               computer generated, produced by electronic means, or an  
               email signature that is intended by the signatory to have  
               the same effect as a handwritten signature.



          1)Allows contractors operating and providing services under this  
            section to maintain records electronically regardless of  
            whether the original documents were created electronically.



          2)Requires all of the above provisions to be done in compliance  
            with state and federal standards as determined by the State  
            Department of Education.
          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)The California Department of Education (CDE) is required to  
            audit child care contractors per federal law in order to  
            receive federal funds to support child care programs. While  
            CDE supports efforts to transition to the collection and use  
            of electronic records, it lacks the capacity and resources to  
            adequately receive and verify electronically generated and  
            maintained records. This bill will create significant General  
            Fund cost pressure to the CDE to develop audit procedures and  
            reporting systems to accommodate electronic record formats and  
            a process to verify the authenticity of those records. Likely  
            CDE costs to develop an appropriate system would be as  
            follows:








                                                                     AB 271


                                                                    Page  3






             a)   One-time costs in the range of $175,000 to train CDE  
               audit staff.

             b)   Unknown on-going costs likely in the low millions of  
               dollars due to increased audit costs for all 76 alternative  
               payment programs and potentially all 800 child care  
               providers.

          1)Potential loss of federal child care funds of approximately  
            $700 million. If CDE does not have a system in place to accept  
            the required documentation necessary for auditors to verify  
            the accuracy of reported information, federal funds could be  
            at risk.

          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. The author states, "California leads the nation when  
            it comes to innovation and technology.  However, many of our  
            state government operations have been left in the past.  As a  
            result, a number of state agencies are forced to operate in a  
            manner that is both outdated and inefficient. [This bill]  
            would update an outmoded procedure by giving child care  
            agencies the option of saving and storing their paperwork  
            electronically.  Providing child care programs with this  
            option would both modernize agency operations and maximize the  
            use of public dollars."

          2)Alternative Payment Programs. There are currently 76 APPs  
            contracted with the California Department of Education (CDE),  
            funded through state and federal funds, to provide an array of  
            support and payment services that enable low-income and  
            eligible families to access subsidized child care. APPs do not  
            provide direct child services or programs, but rather provide  
            families who are participating in welfare-to-work activities  
            under the CalWORKs program, or who are low-income but do not  
            qualify for CalWORKs, with subsidized child care vouchers. 









                                                                     AB 271


                                                                    Page  4





          3)Electronic records. In 2009, the state adopted the Uniform  
            Electronic Transactions Act (UETA). The UETA is the first  
            comprehensive effort to prepare state law for the electronic  
            commerce era. The state adopted rules and regulations that  
            generally apply to all records or signatures generated or  
            transmitted electronically, the formation of contracts using  
            electronic records, the making and retention of electronic  
            records and signatures, and the procedures governing changes  
            and errors in electronically transmitted records. However,  
            UETA does not require records or signatures to be recorded or  
            maintained electronically, but rather it provides a process by  
            which transactions can occur electronically. 

            In 2013, AB 274 (Bonilla) was enacted which allowed APPs to  
            maintain records, including child attendance records,  
            electronically in accordance with state and federal auditing  
            standards. However, it limited the electronic maintenance of  
            records to only those that were generated electronically in  
            response to CDEs concerns about their ability to adequately  
            audit such providers. In December 2013, the CDE issued  
            management bulletin 13-10 implementing the requirements of AB  
            274, which included additional guidance which states that  
            "documents or records created in paper form cannot be scanned  
            and stored electronically. These records must be stored in  
            their original paper format." 

            This bill seeks to further the AB 274 effort by permitting all  
            records to be maintained electronically. However, it is  
            unclear whether this bill will achieve the desired outcome  
            while also ensuring that the electronic records meet state  
            auditing requirements.  In order for an electronic record to  
            be used and accepted, CDE, which is the contracting agency,  
            must agree to the use of electronic documents and have the  
            technology available to accept such documents.  Although the  
            bill allows for APPs and child care providers to use  
            electronic records, it does not mandate the CDE to accept or  
            use them for purposes of programmatic or fiscal compliance.  
            Without the proper systems in place, it is unlikely CDE would  
            do so.








                                                                     AB 271


                                                                    Page  5











          4)Prior Legislation.   AB 2101 (Levine), 2014, was substantially  
            similar to this bill.  It was held on this Committee's  
            Suspense File.




          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081