BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        AB 276|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  AB 276
          Author:   Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials 
          AmendedAmended:8/31/15 in Senate
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE:  7-0, 6/17/15
           AYES:  Wieckowski, Gaines, Bates, Hill, Jackson, Leno, Pavley

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  5-0, 8/27/15
           AYES:  Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bates, Nielsen

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  78-0, 6/3/15 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Department of Toxic Substances Control: response  
                     actions: cleanup ability information


          SOURCE:    Author

          DIGEST:   This bill allows the Department of Toxic Substances  
          Control (DTSC), or an authorized agency, to require a person to  
          furnish information regarding a person's ability to pay for, or  
          to perform, a response action.

          ANALYSIS:  Existing federal law, under the Comprehensive  
          Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA),  
          establishes prohibitions and requirements concerning closed and  
          abandoned hazardous waste sites; provides for liability of  
          persons responsible for releases of hazardous waste at these  
          sites; and authorizes the United States Environmental Protection  
          Agency (US EPA) to request information relating to the ability  
          to pay for or to perform a cleanup.  

          Existing state law:  








                                                                     AB 276  
                                                                     Page 2



               
          1)Establishes the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)  
            to protect California against threats to public health and  
            degradation to the environment and to restore properties  
            degraded by past environmental contamination, and requires the  
            DTSC to regulate management of hazardous wastes, clean up  
            existing contamination, and prevent pollution by working with  
            businesses to reduce their hazardous waste and use of toxic  
            materials.  

          2)Authorizes the DTSC to incur direct cleanup costs and  
            oversight costs (response costs) in remediating contaminated  
            properties.  

          3)Authorizes the DTSC to recover those costs from responsible  
            parties.  

          4)Permits the DTSC or any local officer or agency authorized to  
            enforce the Hazardous Waste Control Law to require specified  
            parties to furnish and transmit certain information relating  
            to hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, and hazardous  
            materials.  

          5)Pursuant to the Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance  
            Account Act, authorizes the DTSC to require any potentially  
            responsible party, or any person who has, or may have acquired  
            certain information relating to hazardous substances and  
            hazardous substance release sites in the course of a  
            commercial, ownership, or contractual relationship with a  
            potentially responsible party to furnish that information.  

          6)Authorizes the US EPA to request information relating to the  
            ability to pay for or to perform a cleanup.  

          This bill:  

          1) Requires any person that is managing or has managed hazardous  
             waste, including those that have applied for a permit, to  
             provide information to the DTSC regarding the ability of  
             those persons to pay for or perform a cleanup;










                                                                     AB 276  
                                                                     Page 3



          2) Authorizes the DTSC to issue an order directing compliance  
             with a request for information if a person intentionally or  
             negligently fails to provide requested information;


          3) Authorizes the DTSC to disclose the information under certain  
             circumstances to authorized representatives, contractors, or  
             government agencies, including the United States  
             Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA);


          4) Requires any person providing the specified information to  
             the DTSC to identify all of the information that is  
             considered a trade secret and imposes penalties for failure  
             to comply with the measures protecting information;


          5) Authorizes the DTSC to require a person who has or may have  
             information relevant to the ability of a person to pay for or  
             perform a cleanup to furnish and transmit that information to  
             the DTSC;


          6) Authorizes the DTSC to impose penalties if a person  
             intentionally or negligently fails to furnish the required  
             information or makes false statements or representations; and  



          7) Provides that there will be no reimbursement by the state for  
             any costs incurred by a local agency.



          Background
          
          1) State Audit Report:  On August 7, 2014, the Bureau of State  
             Audits (BSA) released a report on the DTSC's cost recovery.   
             The BSA found that long-standing shortcomings with the DTSC's  
             recovery of costs have resulted in millions of dollars in  
             unbilled and billed but uncollected cleanup costs dating back  
             to 1987. 








                                                                     AB 276  
                                                                     Page 4




             The BSA found that as of March 2014, the DTSC's spreadsheet  
             for tracking projects with outstanding costs shows that it  
             has 1,661 projects totaling almost $194 million in  
             outstanding costs, of which nearly $142 million was unbilled  
             and almost $52 million was billed but uncollected.  These  
             outstanding costs were incurred between July 1987 and  
             December 2013.

             According to the State Auditor,  "[DTSC] is also limited in  
             its ability to recover costs effectively because it lacks the  
             authority to require a potentially responsible party to  
             provide information related to the financial ability to pay  
             cleanup costs.  Unlike the U.S. Environmental Protection  
             Agency, [DTSC] does not have the authority to require that  
             potentially responsible parties provide financial information  
             when searching for responsible parties.  Instead, [DTSC] can  
             only request potentially responsible parties to provide  
             financial information voluntarily.  Having the authority to  
             compel parties to submit pertinent financial information  
             would allow [DTSC] to identify those potentially responsible  
             parties who genuinely lack the ability to pay for cleanup and  
             no longer require [DTSC] to first sue these parties to obtain  
             financial information...  The ability to require this type of  
             information could better inform the [DTSC's] decision making  
             about whether to file cost recovery actions because it could  
             better differentiate between parties capable of paying for  
             cleanup costs, thus increasing the department's ability to  
             recover costs effectively." 

          2) What information does the US EPA request?  Under CERCLA, the  
             US EPA has the authority to request financial information  
             from potentially responsible parties.  The US EPA typically  
             uses a tiered approach to invoking this authority; first, the  
             US EPA will ask a party if it has the ability to pay or  
             perform a cleanup.  If the party does have that ability, then  
             the US EPA typically does not ask for further information.   
             If the party indicates it cannot pay or perform a cleanup,  
             then the US EPA will request information supporting that  
             claim, including, but not limited to, bank statements,  
             financial statements, proposed budgets, market appraisals,  
             etc. 








                                                                     AB 276  
                                                                     Page 5




             As this bill proposes to model this authority for the DTSC  
             verbatim after the US EPA's existing authority under CERCLA,  
             any party affected by this legislation is already or can be  
             covered under existing federal law. 

          FISCAL EFFECT:           Appropriation:      No   Fiscal  
          Com.:Yes    Local:       Yes




          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this bill will  
          have unknown costs, potentially in the range of $200,000  
          annually, to the Toxic Substances Control Account (General  
          Fund), for workload to request, collect, and process financial  
          information from responsible parties.




          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/27/15)


          California League of Conservation Voters
          Environment California
          Environmental Working Group
          Natural Resources Defense Council


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/27/15)


          None received

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  78-0, 6/3/15
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau,  
            Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly,  
            Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina  
            Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez,  
            Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden,  








                                                                     AB 276  
                                                                     Page 6



            Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder,  
            Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, McCarty, Medina, Melendez,  
            Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson,  
            Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas,  
            Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner,  
            Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Brough, Mayes

          Prepared by:Rachel Machi Wagoner / E.Q. / (916) 651-4108
          8/30/15 19:11:27


                                   ****  END  ****