Amended in Assembly March 5, 2015

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly Bill No. 300

Introduced by Assembly Member Alejo

(Coauthor: Assembly Member Mark Stone)

(Coauthor: Senator Monning)

February 12, 2015

An act to add Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 31420) to Division 21 of the Public Resources Code, relating to coastal wildlife protection.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 300, as amended, Alejo. Safe Water and Wildlife Protection Act of 2015.

Existing law establishes the State Coastal Conservancy begin delete , end delete and prescribes the membership begin delete , end delete and functions and duties of the conservancy with respect to preservation of coastal resources in the state.

This bill would enact the Safe Water and Wildlife Protection Act of 2015, which would require the conservancy to establish and coordinate the Algal Bloom Task Force, in consultation with the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency, and would prescribe the composition and functions and duties of the task force. The bill would require the task force to review the risks and negative impacts of toxic begin insert algal end insert blooms and microcystin pollution and to submit a summary of its findings and recommendations to the secretary by January 1, 2017. The act would authorize the conservancy, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Wildlife Conservation Board, and the State Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts and provide grants from specified bond funds available under the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014 for applied research, projects, and programs, recommended by the task force, aimed at preventing or sustainably mitigating toxic blooms of cyanotoxins and microcystin pollution in the waters of the state.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
following:

(a) Toxic blooms of cyanobacteria in the waters of the state,
including, but not limited to, coastal lakes, estuaries, rivers and
streams, wetlands, and inland lakes and reservoirs, represent a
threat to begin insert water supplies, end insert human health, endangered wildlife, and
recreational activities.

(b) Cyanobacteria are widespread bacteria that are capable of
forming toxic blooms and super-blooms in the waters of the state.

(c) Degradation of watersheds, nutrient loading, increased water
diversions, and climate change have been linked to the global
expansion of cyanobacterial blooms, with high toxin production
noted regularly in lakes, rivers, and other waters of the state.

(d) The state’s waters are especially prone to toxic
cyanobacterial blooms due to our warm climate, numerous water
diversions, and stressed waterways.

(e) Cyanobacteria produce begin delete toxic microcystins and other toxins.
Due to their high toxicity, microcystins are a regulated
pollutantunder federal law. Other cyanobacterial toxins, such as
antitoxin-a, end delete begin insert potent hepatoxins and neurotoxins, collectively referred
to as cyanotoxins. Microcystins are the most commonly found
cyanotoxin in the state’s impacted waters. Other cyanotoxins, such
as the neurotoxins anatoxin-a and saxitoxin, end insert are also present in
California’s waters, but, at present, little is known about begin delete these
toxins. end delete begin insert them end insert begin insert . end insert

(f)  begin delete Microcystin and other cyanotoxins end delete begin insert Cyanotoxins end insert are
poisonous to humans, pets, livestock, birds, and other wildlife via
ingestion, inhalation, or skin exposure. A single dose of microcystin
can cause prolonged toxicity by cycling repeatedly between the
liver and intestines.

(g) Blooms of microcystins and other toxic cyanobacteria are
occurring in waters throughout California, and are threatening our
water supply and health. Areas with recurrent and worsening
begin delete microcystin end delete begin insert cyanotoxin end insert pollution include the Klamath and
Sacramento Rivers, the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (from
the Sacramento Delta to San Francisco Bay), and Clear Lake. Pinto
Lake, Copco Lake, Iron Gate Reservoir, and three segments of the
Klamath River have been listed as impaired due to cyanobacteria.
Bird deaths attributed to microcystins have also been reported from
the Salton Sea.

(h) The Pinto Lake watershed is being evaluated for total
maximum daily load (TMDL) regulation for microcystin, begin delete and is
recognized as a state and national cyanobacteria “hotspot,” end delete and
was considered for remediation as an Environmental Protection
Agency “superfund” site.

(i) California’s southern sea otters, a state and federally listed
threatened species, have died from microcystin poisoning. The
source of sea otter exposure appears to be
microcystin-contaminated freshwater runoff begin delete or mussels, or both,
or clams or crabs that concentrate microcystin after being exposedto
contaminated freshwater runoff end delete begin insert and possibly contaminated prey
species end insert .

(j) Sea otters and humans eat some of the same marine foods
that can concentrate microcystin in body tissues; hence, food safety
is a begin delete concern for public health end delete begin insert public health concern end insert . Freshwater
and marine fish and shellfish have not been routinely tested for
cyanotoxins in California and limited diagnostic testing is available.

(k) A begin delete “One Health” approach, that considers human, animal,
and environmental health, is appropriate to assess impacts and
develop comprehensive strategies to prevent microcystin pollution
in the waters of the state. This represents a multidisciplinary
approach that considers linkages between human, animal, and
environmental health. end delete begin insert multidisciplinary “one-health” approach,
that considers human, animal, and environmental health
components, is appropriate to evaluate impacts and develop
comprehensive strategies to prevent cyanotoxin pollution in the
waters of the state. end insert

(l) The state needs a coordinated multiagency effort to develop
actions and projects that will prevent or mitigate toxic blooms and
associated begin delete toxin end delete begin insert cyanotoxin end insert pollution.

SEC. 2.  

Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 31420) is added
to Division 21 of the Public Resources Code, to read:

 

Chapter  10. Safe Water and Wildlife Protection Act
of 2015

 

31420.  

This chapter shall be known, and may be cited, as the
Safe Water and Wildlife Protection Act of 2015.

31421.  

For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have
the following meanings:

(a) “One-health approach” means a method of assessment that
considers the linked impacts of toxic algal blooms on humans,
animals, the ecosystem, and water quality.

(b) “Task Force” means the Algal Bloom Task Force created
pursuant to Section 31422.

(c) “Waters of the state” means any surface begin delete water end delete begin insert waters end insert in the
state including, but not limited to, coastal lakes, lagoons and
estuaries, rivers, streams, inland lakes and reservoirs, and wetlands.

31422.  

The conservancy shall establish and coordinate the
Algal Bloom Task Force, comprised of a representative of each
of the State Department of Public Health, the Department of Fish
and Wildlife, the State Water Resources Control Board, and other
relevant agency representatives, to be determined by the executive
officer of the conservancy in consultation with the Secretary of
the Natural Resources Agency.

31423.  

The functions and duties of the task force include all
of the following:

(a) Assess and prioritize the actions and research necessary to
develop measures that prevent or sustainably mitigate toxic algal
blooms in the waters of the state. The assessment shall apply a
one-health approach that considers the linked impacts of toxic
algal blooms and cyanotoxins on human and animal health, as well
as in the context of ecosystem health and water quality.

(b) Solicit and review proposals from universities, local
governments, begin insert California Native American tribes, end insert and nonprofit
organizations for applied research, projects, and programs that
begin delete contribute end delete begin insert accomplish both of the following: end insert

begin insert (1) end insert begin insert   end insert begin insert Contribute end insert to development of strategies or implementation
of activities that prevent or sustainably mitigate toxic blooms of
cyanotoxins and microcystin pollution in the waters of the state.

begin insert

(2) Establish cyanotoxin monitoring programs or develop
laboratory capacity for analyzing water samples for cyanotoxin
pollution.

end insert

(c) Provide funding recommendations to the executive officer
of the conservancy and to the Department of Fish and Wildlife,
the Wildlife Conservation Board, and the State Water Resources
Control Board for those proposals for applied research, projects,
and programs, described in subdivision (b), that the task force
determines will contribute to the development of prevention
strategies and sustainable mitigation actions to address toxic
blooms of cyanotoxins and microcystin pollution in waters of the
state.

(d) Review the risks and negative impacts of toxic begin delete algae end delete begin insert algal end insert
blooms and microcystin pollution on humans, wildlife, fisheries,
begin insert livestock, pets, end insert and aquatic ecosystems, and develop
recommendations for prevention and long-term mitigation. The
task force shall submit a summary of its findings based on the
review, including its recommendations to the Secretary of the
Natural Resources Agency on or before January 1, 2017. The
recommendations shall provide guidance on what type of programs
or state resources will be required to prevent damaging toxic algal
blooms and microcystin pollution in the waters of the state over
time.

(e) Organize meetings and workshops of experts and
stakeholders as needed to implement this section.

31424.  

The conservancy, the Department of Fish and Wildlife,
the Wildlife Conservation Board, and the State Water Resources
Control Board, or any of them, may enter into contracts and provide
grants from funds available pursuant to Section 79730 of the Water
Code for applied research, projects, and programs recommended
by the task force pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 31423.