AB 300, as amended, Alejo. Safe Water and Wildlife Protection Act of 2016.
Existing law establishes the State Coastal Conservancy and prescribes the membership and functions and duties of the conservancy with respect to preservation of coastal resources in the state.
This bill would enact the Safe Water and Wildlife Protection Act of 2016, which would require the State Water Resources Control Board to establish and coordinate the Algal Bloom Task Force, comprised of specified representatives of state agencies, including the conservancy, in consultation with the Secretary for Environmental Protection, and would prescribe the functions and duties of the task force. The bill would require the task force to review the risks and negative impacts of toxic algal blooms and microcystin pollution and to submit a summary of its findings and recommendations to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature, the
Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency, and the secretary on or before January 1,
begin delete 2017.end delete The act would require the task force, before providing funding recommendations or submitting a summary of findings, to notify the public about ongoing activities and provide opportunities for public review and comment on applied research, projects, and programs. The act would authorize the conservancy, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Wildlife Conservation Board, and the State Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts and provide grants, upon appropriation, from specified bond funds available under the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014 or from other appropriate funds for applied research, projects, and programs, recommended by the task force, aimed at preventing or
sustainably mitigating toxic blooms of cyanotoxins and microcystin pollution in the waters of the state.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
3(a) Toxic blooms of cyanobacteria in the waters of the state,
4including, but not limited to, coastal lakes, estuaries, rivers and
5streams, wetlands, and inland lakes and reservoirs, represent a
6threat to water supplies, human health, endangered wildlife, and
8(b) Cyanobacteria are widespread bacteria that are capable of
9 forming toxic blooms and super-blooms in the waters of the state.
10(c) Degradation of watersheds, nutrient loading, increased water
11diversions, and climate change have been linked to the global
12expansion of cyanobacterial blooms, with high toxin production
13noted regularly in lakes, rivers, and other waters of the state.
14(d) The state’s waters are especially prone to toxic
15cyanobacterial blooms due to our warm climate, numerous water
16diversions, and stressed waterways.
P3 1(e) Cyanobacteria produce potent hepatotoxins and neurotoxins,
2collectively referred to as cyanotoxins. Microcystins are the most
3commonly found cyanotoxin in the state’s impacted waters. Other
4cyanotoxins, such as the neurotoxins anatoxin-a and saxitoxin, are
5also present in California’s waters, but, at present, little is known
7(f) Cyanotoxins are poisonous to humans, pets, livestock,
8and other wildlife via ingestion, inhalation, or skin exposure. A
9single dose of microcystin can cause prolonged toxicity by cycling
10repeatedly between the liver and intestines.
11(g) Blooms of microcystins and other toxic cyanobacteria are
12occurring in waters throughout California, and are threatening our
13water supply and health. Areas with recurrent and worsening
14cyanotoxin pollution include the Klamath and Sacramento Rivers,
15the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (from the Sacramento
16Delta to San Francisco Bay), and Clear Lake. Pinto Lake, Copco
17Lake, Iron Gate Reservoir, and three segments of the Klamath
18River have been listed as impaired due to cyanobacteria. Bird
19deaths attributed to microcystins have also been reported from the
21(h) The Pinto Lake
watershed is being evaluated for total
22maximum daily load (TMDL) regulation for microcystin, and was
23considered for remediation as an Environmental Protection Agency
25(i) California’s southern sea otters, a state and federally listed
26threatened species, have died from microcystin poisoning. The
27source of sea otter exposure appears to be
28microcystin-contaminated freshwater runoff and possibly
29contaminated prey species.
30(j) Sea otters and humans eat some of the same marine foods
31that can concentrate microcystin in body tissues; hence, food safety
32is a public health concern. Freshwater and marine fish and shellfish
33have not been routinely tested for cyanotoxins in California and
34limited diagnostic testing is available.
35(k) The state needs a coordinated multiagency effort to develop
36actions and projects that will prevent or mitigate toxic blooms and
37associated cyanotoxin pollution.
Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 31420) is added
39to Division 21 of the Public Resources Code, to read:
This chapter shall be known, and may be cited, as the
5Safe Water and Wildlife Protection Act of 2016.
For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have
7the following meanings:
8(a) “Board” means the State Water Resources Control Board.
9 (b) “Task force” means the Algal Bloom Task Force created
10pursuant to Section 31422.
11(c) “Waters of the state” means any surface waters in the state,
12 including, but not limited to, coastal lakes, lagoons and estuaries,
13rivers, streams, inland lakes and reservoirs, wetlands, and marine
(a) The board shall establish and coordinate the Algal
16Bloom Task Force, comprised of a representative of each of the
17State Department of Public Health, the Department of Fish and
18Wildlife, the Department of Food and Agriculture, the conservancy,
19and other relevant agency representatives, to be determined by the
20chairperson of the board, in consultation with the Secretary for
21Environmental Protection. The board may augment an existing
22 task force or network to accomplish the requirements of this
24(b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2019,
25and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
26is enacted before January 1, 2019, deletes or extends that date.
The functions and duties of the task force include all
28of the following:
29(a) Assess and prioritize the actions and research necessary to
30develop measures that prevent or sustainably mitigate toxic algal
31blooms in the waters of the state. The assessment shall consider
32the linked impacts of toxic algal blooms and cyanotoxins on human
33and animal health, as well as in the context of ecosystem health
34and water quality.
35(b) Solicit and review proposals from universities, local
36governments, California Native American tribes, and nonprofit
37organizations for applied research, projects, and programs that
38accomplish both of the following:
P5 1(1) Contribute to development of strategies or implementation
2of activities that prevent or sustainably mitigate toxic blooms of
3cyanotoxins and microcystin pollution in the waters of the state.
4(2) Establish cyanotoxin monitoring programs or develop
5laboratory capacity for analyzing water samples for cyanotoxin
7(c) Provide funding recommendations to the chairperson of the
8board and to the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Wildlife
9Conservation Board, the conservancy, other members of the task
10force, and other relevant agency representatives for those proposals
11for applied research, projects, and programs, described in
12subdivision (b), that the task force determines will contribute to
13the development of prevention strategies and sustainable mitigation
14actions to address toxic blooms of cyanotoxins and microcystin
15pollution in waters of the state.
16(d) Review the risks and negative impacts of toxic algal blooms
17and microcystin pollution on humans, wildlife, fisheries, livestock,
18pets, and aquatic ecosystems, and develop recommendations for
19prevention and long-term mitigation. The task force shall submit
20a summary of its findings based on the review, including its
21recommendations to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees
22of the Legislature, the Secretary for Environmental Protection, and
23the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency on or before January
begin delete 2017.end delete
The recommendations shall provide guidance on
25what type of programs or state resources will be required to prevent
26damaging toxic algal blooms and microcystin pollution in the
27waters of the state over time.
28(e) Organize meetings and workshops of experts and
29stakeholders as needed to implement this section.
30(f) Before providing funding recommendations pursuant to
31subdivision (c), or submitting a summary of findings pursuant to
32subdivision (d), the task force shall establish a notification
33procedure and publish notices to inform the public about ongoing
34activities, and provide opportunities for public review and comment
35on applied research, projects, and programs solicited pursuant to
37(g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2019,
38and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
39is enacted before January 1, 2019, deletes or extends that date.
The conservancy, the Department of Fish and Wildlife,
2the Wildlife Conservation Board, and the board, or any of them,
3may enter into contracts and provide grants, upon appropriation,
4from funds available pursuant to Section 79730 of the Water Code
5or from other appropriate funds accessible by any of these
6departments and agencies for applied research, projects, and
7programs recommended by the task force pursuant to subdivision
8(c) of Section 31423.