BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                       AB 349


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          349 (Gonzalez)


          As Amended  May 5, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                |Noes                  |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------|
          |Housing         |7-0   |Chau, Steinorth,    |                      |
          |                |      |Burke, Chiu, Beth   |                      |
          |                |      |Gaines, Lopez,      |                      |
          |                |      |Mullin              |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Makes the governing documents, architectural or  
          landscaping guidelines, or policies of a common interest  
          development (CID) void and unenforceable if they prohibit the use  
          of artificial turf or any other synthetic surface that resembles  
          grass.    


          FISCAL EFFECT:  None 


          COMMENTS:  There are over 50,220 CIDs in the state that comprise  
          over 4.8 million housing units, or approximately one quarter of  








                                                                       AB 349


                                                                      Page  2





          the state's housing stock.  CIDs include condominiums, community  
          apartment projects, housing cooperatives, and planned unit  
          developments.  They are characterized by a separate ownership of  
          dwelling space coupled with an undivided interest in a common  
          property, restricted by covenants and conditions that limit the  
          use of common area and the separate ownership interests, and the  
          management of common property and enforcement of restrictions by a  
          homeowners association (HOA).  CIDs are governed by the  
          Davis-Stirling Act as well as the governing documents of the  
          association, including bylaws, declaration, and operating rules.   
          CIDs are run by volunteer boards of directors (boards) the members  
          of which may have little or no experience managing real property  
          or governing a nonprofit association and who must interpret the  
          complex laws regulating CIDs.  Boards must not only interpret the  
          law, but enforce the restrictions and rules imposed by the  
          governing documents and state law. 


          Under existing law the governing documents of a CID cannot  
          prohibit a homeowner from installing low water-using plants as a  
          group.  In addition, CIDs cannot prevent a homeowner from  
          installing landscaping that complies with a city's or county's  
          water-efficient landscape ordinance or from complying with any  
          restrictions on watering that a city or county adopts in response  
          to severe water shortages. 


          This bill would prohibit an HOA from preventing a homeowner from  
          installing artificial turf or synthetic grass.  Existing law  
          allows an HOA to apply landscaping rules that are included in the  
          governing documents, as long as those rules do not have the effect  
          of prohibiting the of use of low-water using plants or prevent a  
          homeowner from complying with a local water-efficient landscaping  
          ordinance.  Under this bill, this provision would also apply to  
          artificial turf or synthetic grass.  As a result, an HOA could  
          establish reasonable design and quality restrictions about the  
          type of artificial turf a homeowner can use, including for  
          example, the color and replacement requirements, as long as those  
          restrictions did not effectively make it impossible for a  








                                                                       AB 349


                                                                      Page  3





          homeowner to install artificial turf.     


          Purpose of this bill:  According to the author, "this year was the  
          lowest snowpack ever recorded, and California is in the fourth  
          year of a historic, prolonged and potentially devastating drought.  
           Governor Brown issued an Executive Order on April 1, 2015, which,  
          for the first time ever in California history, directs the State  
          Water Resources Control Board to implement mandatory water  
          reductions across the state to reduce water usage by 25%.  One  
          component of the Governor's Executive Order compels the  
          replacement of 50 million square feet of lawns throughout the  
          state with drought-tolerant landscaping.  


          "Given the extent and breadth of this drought situation, all  
          reasonable opportunities to improve water savings and efficiency  
          should be available to all communities.  Among a wide variety of  
          drought-tolerant landscaping are a variety of native plants and  
          landscaping alternatives, including the installation of synthetic  
          grass or artificial turf.  According to the Department of Water  
          Resources, landscape irrigation represents 43% of urban water use,  
          and the installation of artificial turf or synthetic grass, in  
          lieu of conventional lawns and landscapes, can directly reduce  
          outdoor water use to help meet the Governor's mandated 25%  
          statewide water use reduction.  


          "Today, the vast majority of Californians may elect to install  
          artificial turf or synthetic grass in their single-family  
          residential landscapes, and homeowners within common interest  
          developments should also be afforded a similar opportunity within  
          appropriate design, aesthetic, and drainage standards defined by  
          the homeowners' association."


          Related legislation:  SB 759 (Lieu) of 2011, would have made the  
          governing documents of a CID void if they prohibited or included  
          provisions that effectively prohibited the installation of  








                                                                       AB 349


                                                                      Page  4





          artificial turf or any synthetic surface that resembles grass.  SB  
          759 was vetoed by the Governor.  The veto message stated:   


               Under this bill, homeowners associations that govern  
               Common Interest Developments would be forced to approve  
               the installation of Astro Turf. The decision about  
               choosing synthetic turf instead of natural vegetation  
               should be left to individual homeowners associations,  
               not mandated by state law. For this reason, I am  
               returning this bill.


          AB 1793 (Saldana) of 2010, would have made the governing documents  
          of a CID void if they prohibited or included provisions that  
          effectively prohibited the installation of artificial turf or any  
          synthetic surface that resembles grass.  AB 1793 was vetoed by the  
          Governor.  The veto message stated:   


               This bill would void a provision in the governing  
               documents of a common interest development (CID) if it  
               prohibits the use of artificial turf or any other  
               synthetic surface that resembles grass in its  
               landscaping rules and regulations. 


               CIDs provide a system of self-governance through a  
               community association, responsible for managing,  
               maintaining, and repairing the common areas, and have  
               the authority to enforce special rules.  Decisions such  
               as these regarding the use of artificial turf can be  
               made by the homeowners and amended into their governing  
               documents. 


               For this reason I cannot sign this bill.










                                                                       AB 349


                                                                      Page  5







          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
                          Lisa Engel / H. & C.D. / (916) 319-2085  FN:  
          0000435