BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                       AB 392


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          392 (Atkins)


          As Amended  May 5, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                |Noes                  |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------|
          |Natural         |9-0   |Williams, Dahle,    |                      |
          |Resources       |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |Cristina Garcia,    |                      |
          |                |      |Hadley, Harper,     |                      |
          |                |      |McCarty, Rendon,    |                      |
          |                |      |Mark Stone, Wood    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0  |Gomez, Bigelow,     |                      |
          |                |      |Bonta, Calderon,    |                      |
          |                |      |Chang, Daly,        |                      |
          |                |      |Eggman, Gallagher,  |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |Eduardo Garcia,     |                      |
          |                |      |Gordon, Holden,     |                      |
          |                |      |Jones, Quirk,       |                      |
          |                |      |Rendon, Wagner,     |                      |
          |                |      |Weber, Wood         |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |








                                                                       AB 392


                                                                      Page  2





          |                |      |                    |                      |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Eliminates the 2020 sunset date for the San Diego River  
          Conservancy (Conservancy) and requires the Conservancy to submit a  
          report to the Governor and Legislature on January 1, 2017, and  
          every two years thereafter.  The report must include:


          1)A description of every project funded or undertaken by the  
            Conservancy, as specified, during the two years prior to the  
            report.


          2)A progress report on the Conservancy's accomplishments toward  
            fulfilling its mission during the two years prior to the report.


          3)Recommended legislative action necessary to provide funding or  
            other resources to enable the Conservancy to more effectively  
            and efficiently carry out its mission, goals, and objectives.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1)Increased annual administrative state costs of between $350,000  
            per year (Environmental License Plate Fund or other special  
            fund) beginning in Fiscal Year 2020-21.


          2)Minor, likely absorbable, costs for the biennial reports.


          COMMENTS:










                                                                       AB 392


                                                                      Page  3





          1)Purpose of the bill.  The mission of the Conservancy will be  
            partly accomplished by building, with partners, a San Diego  
            River Park and hiking trail stretching from the headwaters in  
            Julian to the Pacific Ocean.  The San Diego River is an  
            important historic, archaeological and cultural area within  
            California.  Making the Conservancy permanent will assist with  
            long-term planning and development.


          2)Conservancy.  The Conservancy watershed spans 440 square miles,  
            includes 6 major reservoirs, four cities, a large area of  
            unincorporated county lands, Cleveland National Forest, and  
            Native American reservations, with 700,000 people living within  
            its area of influence and an additional 2 million people in  
            adjacent communities.  The river is 52 miles from its headwaters  
            near Julian to the Pacific Ocean at Ocean Beach.  Its rich  
            cultural and historic connections began with the Kumeyaay who  
            settled in the area more than 11,000 years ago and extends  
            through Spanish, Mexican, and early Californian settlements.  In  
            its 12-year history, the Conservancy has overseen over 100 acres  
            of restoration along the river, the construction and renovation  
            of approximately 15 miles of a public trail along the river that  
            is well used by people of all ages, and the acquisition of over  
            200 acres of land. 




          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
                          Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092  FN:  
          0000701
















                                                                       AB 392


                                                                      Page  4