BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 399 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 22, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON INSURANCE Tom Daly, Chair AB 399 Ridley-Thomas - As Amended April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Unemployment insurance: classified school employees SUMMARY: Allows classified school employees to collect unemployment insurance (UI) benefits between school years. Specifically, this bill: 1)Exempts classified public school employees from the prohibition on educational employees collecting UI benefits. 2)Increases the maximum duration of UI benefits for classified public school employees as follows: a. 2 weeks effective July 1, 2016 b. 4 weeks effective July 1, 2017 c. 6 weeks effective July 1, 2018 d. 8 weeks effective July 1, 2019 AB 399 Page 2 EXISTING LAW: 1)Provides UI benefits to employees who lose their job through no fault of their own. 2)Requires employers to pay state and federal taxes to pay the costs of administering and providing UI benefits. 3)Permits public employers to provide UI benefits to their employees on a reimbursement basis in lieu of paying payroll taxes. 4)Prohibits employees of public and private non-profit educational institutions from collecting UI benefits between academic years if they have reasonable assurance of being employed in the next academic term. 5)Permits non-professional employees of public and non-profit educational institutions to collect UI benefits retroactively should they not be employed in the next academic term after receiving reasonable assurance of future employment. 6)Requires employers to provide documentation of the reasonable assurance when that notice is given. 7)Prohibits, as a matter of federal law, providing UI benefits to professional employees between academic years. FISCAL EFFECT: Undetermined AB 399 Page 3 COMMENTS: 1)Purpose . According to the author, classified school employees do the essential work that keeps our public schools up and running. These extraordinary workers keep our campuses safe, clean, and efficient. Most importantly, they strive to improve the daily lives of our students. Despite the important and hard work of classified school employees, many struggle to support their families with incomes that are often inadequate to pay for food, housing, and health care. And while certified school employees, such as administrators, teachers, librarians, and nurses, earn middle class incomes and benefits that can last through the summer breaks, classified school employees do not. Unlike other employees who receive UI benefits during their regular seasonal breaks, classified school employees are ineligible to receive those same benefits. The only option for classified school employees to support their families during the summer is to find another job. Yet classified school employees are often unable to find work during the summer because employers are reluctant to hire and invest in a short-term employee. Thus, a classified school employee's only real option for summer employment is a job with a summer school program, but those jobs are scarce. Being excluded from UI benefits creates a serious financial hardship for a classified school employee that does not exist for their fellow education workers. 2)Federal Law . Federal law generally requires equal treatment for the payment of UI benefits on the basis of service to certain nonprofit organizations, Indian tribes, and state and local government workers in the same amount, on the same terms, and subject to the same conditions, as other service subject to state law. An exception to the equal treatment requirement pertains to the denial of UI for "professional" and "nonprofessional" employees of educational institutions during a period between or within academic years or terms when AB 399 Page 4 there is a contract or reasonable assurance that the employee will go back to work in the same or similar capacity in the ensuing academic year/term. State law must deny UI benefits to professional school employees between and within the academic years or terms when a contract or reasonable assurance exists. State law may deny UI benefits to nonprofessional school employees between and within the academic years or terms when a contract or reasonable assurance exists. 3)Public Agency Costs . This bill would likely have relatively minor impact to the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund (trust fund) that pays for most UIC benefits because public K-12 school districts and community colleges commonly elect to participate in the School Employees Fund (SEF) in lieu of paying payroll taxes. The SEF is a special reimbursable financing method administered by the Employment Development Department which collects contributions based upon a percentage of total wages paid by public schools and community college districts. Money deposited in the SEF is used to reimburse the trust fund for the cost of benefits paid to former employees. All 72 community college districts and 1,298 county offices of education, public school districts, and charter schools participate in the SEF. The SEF has a projected fund balance of over $485 million at the end of the 2014-15 fiscal year. The costs of paying for these additional benefits from this bill will be borne by the SEF, and the SEF costs will have to be reimbursed by the participating schools. Opponents note that the bill would result in significant cost increases for K-12 school districts and other local educational agencies that have experienced dramatic budget cuts in recent years and continue to operate within very tight budgets. Last year the Assembly Appropriations Committee provided the following estimate for AB 1638 (Bocanegra) which is consistent with the final costs of this bill: "There are approximately 250,000 non-certificated, AB 399 Page 5 classified employees throughout the state. If 60% of those employees received 8 weeks of UI during summer vacation each year, it would cost approximately $360 million (School Employees Fund)." 4)Retroactive Benefits . School employees expect to not work at school (and generally not be paid) during the break between academic years. In recognition of this reality, current law provides a mechanism for classified employees to receive unemployment benefits retroactively should they not be employed at the next school year. This ensures that a classified employee who expected to be employed in the next school year, but was not, can collect UIC benefits from the end of the prior school year. 5)Previous Legislation . In 2014, this committee passed AB 1638 (Bocanegra) which proposed to extend UI benefits to classified school employees. The bill was held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee Suspense File. In 2013, this committee passed AB 615 (Bocanegra) which is nearly identical to AB 1638. The bill was held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee Suspense File. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support Service Employees International Union, California (sponsor) California Federation of Teachers (co-sponsor) California Teachers Association AB 399 Page 6 California Labor Federation California School Employees Association Opposition California Association of School Business Officials Orange County Department of Education Riverside County Superintendent of Schools Analysis Prepared by:Paul Riches / INS. / (916) 319-2086