BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 400


                                                                    Page  1


          Date of Hearing:  March 23, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION


                                   Frazier, Chair


          AB  
                     400 (Alejo) - As Introduced  February 19, 2015


          SUBJECT:  Department of Transportation:  changeable message  
          signs


          SUMMARY:  Requires, prior to June 30, 2016, the California  
          Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to update its policies  
          regarding changeable message signs, as prescribed.   
          Specifically, this bill:  


          1)Requires Caltrans to update its internal policies to allow the  
            following specific types of changeable message signs displays:  
             

             a)   Safety messages;  

             b)   Transportation-related messages;  

             c)   Reminders to register to vote; and,

             d)   Reminders to vote as elections approach.  

          1)Defines "changeable message sign."  

          2)Provides that this bill's provisions are not intended to alter  
            the requirements of the Emergency Alert System or the Amber  
            Plan, as specifically referenced.  

          EXISTING  








                                                                     AB 400


                                                                    Page  2


            LAW:1)  



          1)Directs Caltrans, based on consultation with local agencies  
            and after holding public hearings, to adopt and publish rules  
            and regulations prescribing uniform traffic control standards.  
             Caltrans publishes these rules, regulations, and standards in  
            the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices  
            (California MUTCD).  

          2)Provides that only those official traffic control devices that  
            conform to the California MUTCD may be placed on a street or  
            highway.  

          3)Establishes the Emergency Alert System, nicknamed "Amber  
            Alert," which may be activated if a law enforcement agency  
            receives a report of a child abduction and the victim is in  
            imminent danger of serious bodily injury or death, and there  
            is information available that, if disseminated to the general  
            public, could assist in the safe recovery of the victim.



          4)Establishes the "Blue Alert" notification system, designed to  
            issue and coordinate alerts if a law enforcement officer has  
            been killed or is seriously injured by a suspect who has fled  
            the scene and poses an imminent threat to public safety.



          5)Establishes a "Silver Alert" notification system, designed to  
            issue and coordinate alerts if a person age 65 or older is  
            missing; includes developmentally disabled or cognitively  
            impaired persons on the list of persons who qualify under the  
            "Silver Alert" notification system.

          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown


          COMMENTS:  Existing federal law requires all states to follow  
          the federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD),  








                                                                     AB 400


                                                                    Page  3


          or to at least substantially comply with it.  The federal MUTCD  
          prescribes standards for signs, signals, and pavement markings  
          throughout the nation.  California has adopted its own MUTCD,  
          which has been approved by federal officials as being  
          "substantially in compliance" with the federal MUTCD.  


          In California, development of the California MUTCD is the  
          responsibility of the California Traffic Control Devices  
          Committee (CTCDC).  The CTCDC is convened and chaired by  
          Caltrans and the committee's membership includes eight voting  
          members representing the California Highway Patrol, the League  
          of California Cities, the California State Association of  
          Counties, and auto clubs.  Meetings of the CTCDC serve as  
          requisite public hearings prior to promulgating rules related to  
          traffic signs, signals, and pavement markings.  

          Both the federal and California MUTCDs include provisions  
          governing changeable message signs.  These provisions stipulate  
          that changeable message signs have a large number of  
          applications, including but not limited to:  

          1)Incident management and route diversion;

          2)Warning of adverse weather conditions;

          3)Special event applications associated with traffic control or  
 
            conditions;

          4)Control at crossing situations;

          5)Lane, ramp, and roadway control;

          6)Priced or other types of management lanes;

          7)Travel times;

          8)Warning situations;

          9)Traffic regulations;









                                                                     AB 400


                                                                    Page  4


          10)Speed control; and,

          11)Destination guidance.  

          Both the federal and the California MUTCD also limit the use of  
          changeable message signs to traffic operations, regulatory,  
          warning and guidance information.  The use of changeable message  
          signs for advertising is prohibited; however, safety- and  
          transportation-related messages such as, "DON'T DRINK AND  
          DRIVE," "SEAT BELT BUCKLED?," and "OZONE ALERT CODE RED - USE  
          TRANSIT" are authorized.   

          According to the author, the record low voter turnout in the  
          2014 statewide primary election is evidence that California is  
          facing a "democracy crisis when it comes to the civic  
          participation of its voters."  The author further asserts that  
          the means by which the state can outreach to voters has become  
          increasingly constrained because of the current fiscal climate.   
          The author has introduced this bill to increase civic engagement  
          by displaying election-related reminders on changeable message  
          signs for motorists to read.  

          Generally, Caltrans' policy relative to signs is to minimize the  
          number of signs whenever possible in part, to avoid "sign  
          information overload" which can interfere with motorist ability  
          to assimilate information and respond properly and safely to  
          roadway situations.  In fact, both the federal and California  
          MUTCD provide that, "Traffic control devices or their supports  
          shall not bear any advertising message or any other message that  
          is not related to traffic control."  According to the Federal  
          Highway Administration, "This position is founded on safety and  
          operational concerns, particularly as related to driver  
          distraction.  Highway signs and other traffic control devices  
          convey crucial information.  In order for road users to perceive  
          and respond appropriately to critical information, we must make  
          sure that its conspicuity is preserved so that the safe and  
          orderly movement of traffic is not compromised."  

          Application of these standards has not always been consistent,  
          however.  Changeable message signs are regularly used to notify  
          motorists of abducted persons via "Amber Alerts" or missing  
          persons via "Silver Alerts," which are not technically  








                                                                     AB 400


                                                                    Page  5


          transportation or safety related.  Last summer, Caltrans used  
          the signs to caution against wasting water because of  
          California's severe drought conditions.  Moreover, Caltrans  
          applied to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in 2008 for  
          a waiver to allow California to sell advertising on its  
          changeable message signs as a way to raise revenue, despite the  
          policy concerns regarding driver distractions.  (FHWA never  
          approved the waiver request.)  And along those same lines, the  
          Legislature passed (and the Governor signed) SB 853 (Committee  
          on Budget and Fiscal Review), Chapter 27, Statutes of 2014,  
          requiring Caltrans to report to the Legislature by January 10,  
          2015, on the subject of advertising on electronic changeable  
          message signs on the state highway system, and on the  
          feasibility of a pilot project in that regard, including  
          estimates of revenue.  Caltrans has not yet submitted this  
          report.  
           
           Committee concerns:  The committee is concerned that displaying  
          non transportation- or safety-related messages will lessen the  
          effectiveness of the changeable message signs and reduce the  
          safety benefits the signs otherwise provide.  

          Furthermore, this bill follows in the precedent set by last  
          year's use of changeable message signs for non-transportation or  
          emergency messages.  Caltrans justified the use of the signs for  
          drought-related messages because they were related to a state of  
          emergency declared by the Governor.  However, that precedent  
          (and this bill if it is successful) could lead to the use of the  
          signs for other, equally admirable efforts, for example,  
          encouraging motorists to donate blood, read books to children,  
          or develop healthy lifestyles.  A proliferation of these other  
          types of messages would further reduce the effectiveness of the  
          changeable message signs on motorist safety.  

          Technical amendment:  The bill specifically provides that  
          nothing in its requirements to use changeable message signs for  
          voter-related messages should be construed to alter the  
          requirements of the Emergency Alert system, commonly referred to  
          as the Amber Alert system.  The bill should be amended to  
          specify that voter-related messages should also not interfere  
          with the Blue Alert system.  









                                                                     AB 400


                                                                    Page  6


          Previous legislation:  The author introduced an identical bill  
          in 2012, AB 1722.  AB 1722 failed to secure sufficient votes for  
          passage in this Committee.

          SB 853 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), Chapter 27,  
          Statutes of 2014, required Caltrans to report to the Legislature  
          by January 10, 2015, on the subject of advertising on electronic  
          changeable message signs on the state highway system, and on the  
          feasibility of a pilot project in that regard, including  
          estimates of revenue.  Caltrans has not yet delivered the  
          report.


          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:


          Support




          Honorable Alex Padilla, California Secretary of State


          Opposition


          None on file


          Analysis Prepared  
          by:              Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093


















                                                                     AB 400


                                                                    Page  7