BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 404 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 404 (Chiu) As Amended April 13, 2015 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes |Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+------+-----------------------+-------------------| |Higher |12-0 |Medina, Baker, Bloom, | | |Education | |Harper, Irwin, | | | | |Jones-Sawyer, Levine, | | | | |Linder, Low, Santiago, | | | | |Weber, Williams | | | | | | | |----------------+------+-----------------------+-------------------| |Appropriations |17-0 |Gomez, Bigelow, Bloom, | | | | |Bonta, Calderon, | | | | |Chang, Daly, Eggman, | | | | |Gallagher, Eduardo | | | | |Garcia, Holden, Jones, | | | | |Quirk, Rendon, Wagner, | | | | |Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Requires the regional accrediting agency for the California Community Colleges (CCC) to report to the CCC Board of AB 404 Page 2 Governors (BOG) as soon as practicable after the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NICIQI) has notified the agency of the date by which their application for continued recognition is due; and, requires the CCC BOG to conduct a survey of the CCC, including faculty and classified personnel, to develop a report to be transmitted to the United States Department of Education (USDE) and NICIQI that reflects a systemwide evaluation of the agency based on criteria used to determine an accreditor's status. EXISTING LAW: 1)Establishes the BOG to provide general supervision over the CCC and requires the BOG to prescribe minimum standards for CCC formation and operation (Education Code (EDC) Section 66700); 2)Requires the BOG to develop minimum standards governing academic standards, employment policies and shared governance; evaluate CCC fiscal and educational effectiveness and provide assistance when districts encounter management difficulties; administer state funding and establish minimum conditions entitling CCC districts to receive state funds; requires the CCC BOG, in determining if a CCC district satisfies the minimum conditions for receipt of apportionment funding, to review the accreditation status of the CCCs within that district review and approve educational programs (EDC Section 70901); 3)Requires the accrediting agency for CCCs to report to the appropriate policy and budget subcommittees of the Legislature upon the issuance of a decision that affects the accreditation status of a community college and, on a biannual basis, any accreditation policy changes that affect the accreditation process or status for a CCC; and, requires the CCC Chancellor's Office to ensure that the appropriate policy and budget subcommittees are provided the aforementioned required information (EDC Section 72208); AB 404 Page 3 4)BOG regulations (5 California Code of Regulations Section 51016) require CCCs to be accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC). However, BOG recently approved regulatory changes that would continue the requirement for accrediting, but remove the explicit requirement of accreditation by the ACCJC. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, minor one-time General Fund cost (around $50,000) for the Chancellor's Office of the CCC to develop and conduct the survey, summarize the survey data, and prepare the required report. COMMENTS: Background. Accreditation is a voluntary, non-governmental peer review process used to determine academic quality. Accrediting agencies are private organizations that establish operating standards for educational or professional institutions and programs, determine the extent to which the standards are met, and publicly announce their findings. Under federal law, the USDE establishes the general standards for accreditation agencies and is required to publish a list of recognized accrediting agencies that are deemed reliable authorities on the quality of education provided by their accredited institutions. Institutional accreditation is a requirement for participation in federal financial aid programs. Under federal regulations, accrediting agencies are required to meet general outlined standards, but specific processes and quality standards are left to each accrediting agency to determine. USDE relies on NACIQI, an 18-member committee appointed equally by the United States Secretary of Education, United States House of Representatives, and the United States Senate, to review accrediting agencies and advise the Secretary on whether an accrediting agency is a reliable authority regarding the quality AB 404 Page 4 of the education provided by the institutions it accredits. NACIQI is charged with determining whether an accrediting agency complies with various criteria for recognition, which include, among other requirements: appropriate accreditation standards; fair and consistent application of accreditation standards; proper monitoring and reevaluation of accredited institutions; and, immediate enforcement to ensure compliance with standards. During the initial application or continued recognition review process, USDE staff publishes a notice in the Federal Register, inviting the public to comment on the agency's compliance with the criteria for recognition and establishing a deadline for receipt of public comment. Public comments are reviewed by NICIQI and USDE staff prior to the USDE decision regarding initial or continued recognition of the accrediting agency. USDE determines the recognition period, up to five years. Purpose of this bill. According to the author, "there has been a historical lack of accountability for an accrediting agency overseeing the CCCs. This deficiency is due to fear of retribution, scarce local resources, and the absence of a pathway for CCC and other local stakeholders to provide meaningful feedback during an accrediting agency's performance review process for continued accreditation recognition." The author notes that in past NACIQI reviews of ACCJC, there has not been a strong voice for the CCC system as a whole; further, the CCC system does not currently have a method for soliciting feedback from colleges, faculty, and other stakeholders. The author believes that increasing participation in the review process will increase accrediting agency accountability. Analysis Prepared by: Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960 FN: 0000320 AB 404 Page 5