BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                             Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
                            2015 - 2016  Regular  Session

          AB 413 (Chávez) - California Disabled Veteran Business  
          Enterprise Program.
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Version: June 30, 2015          |Policy Vote: V.A. 5 - 0         |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Urgency: No                     |Mandate: No                     |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Hearing Date: July 13, 2015     |Consultant: Robert Ingenito     |
          |                                |                                |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          This bill may meet the criteria for referral to the Suspense  
          File.




          


          Bill  
          Summary: AB 413, upon the death or permanent disability of an  
          owner of a certified disabled veteran-owned business enterprise  
          (DVBE), would authorize a spouse or child to enter into  
          additional state contracts during the three years currently  
          permitted for the continued operation of a DVBE.


          Fiscal  
          Impact:
                 The aggregate impact of this bill on state contracts is  
               unknown, and would reflect various factors. Some of these  
               factors would potentially increase state costs, while  







          AB 413 (Chávez)                                        Page 1 of  
          ?
          
          
               others would likely lead to a reduction in state costs.  
               (See Staff Comments).

                 The Department of General Services (DGS) would incur  
               minor and absorbable costs related to rulemaking.


          Background:  Established in 1989, the DVBE program sets a goal  
          for most awarding state departments to expend a minimum of three  
          percent of their overall contract dollars on DVBEs certified by  
          DGS. Departments that award contracts may meet this goal by  
          either (1) contracting directly with certified DVBE firms, or  
          (2) requiring winning bidders to use them as subcontractors. To  
          be eligible to become a certified DVBE, a business must be at  
          least 51 percent owned by a disabled veteran, have its daily  
          operations managed and controlled by a disabled veteran, and be  
          located in the United States.
          Current law provides that, if the disabled veteran majority  
          owner dies or incurs a permanent medical disability, an  
          inheriting spouse and/or child may retain the firm's  
          certification and continue to operate as a DVBE for three years,  
          for the sole purpose of fulfilling the terms of any contract  
          entered into prior to the disabled veteran's death or permanent  
          disability. However, the inheriting spouse/child may not enter  
          into any new contracts during the three-year period.


          State agencies frequently offer a DVBE incentive (in the form of  
          a bid preference), to bidders that include specified levels of  
          DVBE participation in their bids. The incentive can be up to  
          five percent of the bid amount. Generally, the bid preference is  
          offered on a sliding scale reflecting the level of DVBE  
          participation in the bid.  


          For most agencies, offering the DVBE incentive is optional; it  
          is one of several tools they can use to achieve their annual  
          goal of three percent DVBE participation in their contracts.  
          However, in instances where the agency has failed to achieve the  
          goal in two of the last three fiscal years, DGS regulations  
          require the agency to offer the DVBE incentive.











          AB 413 (Chávez)                                        Page 2 of  
          ?
          
          

          Proposed Law:  
          This bill would authorize, following the death or permanent  
          disability of the disabled veteran majority owner of a certified  
          DVBE, a surviving spouse or child to enter into additional state  
          contracts during the three-year period following the death or  
          disability, provided that the contracts can be completed within  
          the three-year period.


          Related  
          Legislation: AB 409 (Dickerson, Chapter 767, Statutes of 1999)  
          requires (1) that certification of a DVBE be continued for up to  
          three years after the death or certification of permanent  
          medical disability of the disabled veteran owning the  
          enterprise; and (2) that the Department of Veterans Affairs  
          appoint an advocate, who would be responsible for overseeing  
          implementation of this bill and general DVBE participation goals  
          in state contracting.


          Staff  
          Comments: The fiscal impact of this bill would be determined by  
          several factors, including (1) the number of deaths of  
          qualifying disabled veterans, and (2) the extent to which  
          affected DVBEs under ownership control of a spouse or child  
          elect to bid on new contracts during the three-year period. DGS  
          assumes that the bill would likely result in an unknown, but  
          larger number of firms capable of claiming DVBE status for the  
          purpose of bidding for new contracts.
          To the extent that there are more DVBEs available for purposes  
          of contract awards, this may result in more bidders qualifying  
          for the DVBE incentive and/or some bidders qualifying for  
          greater DVBE incentives than would otherwise be the case.  
          Consequently, the DVBE incentive could result in a higher bid  
          displacing a lower bid, the result of which would be increased  
          contract costs beyond what would have happened on the natural. 


          Conversely, non-DVBE bidders on competitively bid contracts are  
          generally required to subcontract three percent of the contract  
          dollar value to DVBEs, unless this requirement is waived in  
          advance by the awarding state department.  A non-DVBE bidder  
          must indicate, in its bid, which DVBE(s) it will use, which  








          AB 413 (Chávez)                                        Page 3 of  
          ?
          
          
          element(s) of the work the DVBE(s) will perform, and what  
          percentage of the contracted dollar value is being subcontracted  
          to each one.  Otherwise, the bid is found nonresponsive and is  
          rejected. To the extent that there are more DVBEs available for  
          purposes of serving as subcontractors, this may make it easier  
          for non-DVBE bidders to find a DVBE capable of participating as  
          a subcontractor, and thus may result in reduced costs due to  
          greater competition for state contracts.


          The extent to which one of these effects overwhelms the other  
          would determine the bill's impact on contract costs relative to  
          current law.


          DGS data indicate that in 2013-14, state departments spent over  
          $8 billion dollars in contracts, $299 million of which went to  
          DVBEs. DVBEs participated in 14,305 contracts. 




                                      -- END --