BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 483 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 483 (Patterson) As Amended September 2, 2015 Majority vote -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: | 78-0 | (June 2, |SENATE: |40-0 | (September 8, | | | |2015) | | |2015) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: B. & P. SUMMARY: Requires that the fees for an initial license or an original license issued by specified regulatory entities under the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) be prorated on a monthly basis. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires that the fees be prorated for the following licensees: a) Dentist; b) Dental hygienist; c) Osteopathic physician and surgeon; d) Occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant; AB 483 Page 2 e) Registered veterinary technician; f) Veterinarian; g) Acupuncturist; and, h) Architect. 2)Makes conforming changes. The Senate amendments: 1)Removed hearing aid dispensers, physical therapists, and physical therapist assistants from this bill. 2)Delayed the implementation date for the proration to July 1, 2017. 3)Added chaptering language for bills AB 179 (Bonilla) and SB 800 (Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development) of the current legislative session. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this bill will result in: 1)Minor administrative costs to revise regulations and update forms and procedures for collecting initial license fees by several boards and committees within the DCA. 2)One-time costs of about $140,000 for information technology upgrades to the computer system used to process license applications. AB 483 Page 3 3)Ongoing revenue loss of about $120,000 per year in reduced licensing fees. The following boards and committees would experience reduced license fee revenues: Architects Board ($16,000), Dental Hygiene Committee ($19,000), Osteopathic Medical Board ($10,000), Physical Therapy Board ($29,000), and Veterinary Medical Board ($76,000). COMMENTS: Purpose. This bill is author sponsored. According to the author, "[This bill] will decrease financial burdens on newly-licensed professionals in our state. Current law in California states that initial licenses for certain professions? expire on the last day of a licensee's birth month on the second year of their second term. "For example, a constituent in my district? was notified that her brand-new license expired in three weeks, due to her birth date, and that she had to pay a full $160 renewal fee. This occurred only a few months after she paid $575 for her state exam and application and $100 for her initial license. "Various licensing agencies have tried to remedy this issue, but this piecemeal approach still means that licensees in some professions pay far more than is appropriate for the duration of their initial license. [This bill] would standardize initial licensing fees across state-licensed professions that follow a birth month renewal policy. [This bill] makes a common-sense change to a policy that can adversely affect young professionals who are just starting out in their careers." Background. Many of the boards within the DCA have implemented a birth date renewal program to calculate license expiration dates. Under the program, a license expires on the licensee's birth date or on the last day of the licensee's birth month on AB 483 Page 4 the second year of a two-year renewal term. For many boards, licensees submit applications for licensure at the same time (e.g. because of the timing of exams). This causes boards to have a large number of applications for initial licenses during peak times. As a result, many boards now renew licenses based on birth date, rather than the date the license was issued, which helps prevent the boards from processing large numbers of applications or renewals at one time. Depending on the board, the initial license period can vary from a few months up to 24 months, depending on the applicant's birth month. Existing License Fee Pro Rata Formulas. Currently, there are boards that use an initial license fee pro rata formula. The Board of Psychology (BOP) and the Veterinary Medical Board (VMB) are required by statute to establish a birth date renewal program that includes a pro rata formula for the payment of fees. The Acupuncture Board (CAB) voluntarily established a pro rata formula through regulation. The CAB has used a formula for an initial license that pro rates fees on a monthly basis. According to the CAB, its pro rata formula has been in place for over a decade and continues to operate well. Analysis Prepared by: Vincent Chee / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301 FN: 0002116 AB 483 Page 5