BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 494| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 494 Author: Maienschein (R), et al. Amended: 5/18/15 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 7-0, 6/09/15 AYES: Jackson, Moorlach, Anderson, Hertzberg, Leno, Monning, Wieckowski ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 4/16/15 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Restraining orders: protection of animals SOURCE: Executive Committee of the Family Law Section of the State Bar DIGEST: This bill authorizes the court, on a showing of good cause, to include in a civil protective or restraining order, as specified, an order 1) granting the petitioner exclusive care, possession, or control of an animal that is held by a person protected by a restraining order, or that resides in the same residence as a person protected by a restraining order; and 2) instructing the respondent or restrained person to stay away from the animal, and refrain from taking or harming the animal, as specified. ANALYSIS: Existing law: AB 494 Page 2 1)Establishes the Domestic Violence Prevention Act, and authorizes a court to issue an ex parte domestic violence protective order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, harassing, telephoning, destroying personal property, and other specified behaviors. (Fam. Code Sec. 6200 et seq.) 2)Provides that a domestic violence protective order may include, among other things, orders excluding a party from a residence, enjoining a party from specific behavior, determining temporary custody and visitation rights, determining the temporary use of property, and restraining a party from specific acts to the parties' community, separate and quasi-community property. (Fam. Code Secs. 6321-25.) 3)Authorizes a court to issue protective orders ex parte and/or after a noticed motion and a hearing. (Fam. Code Secs. 6320, 6340.) 4)Authorizes a court, upon a showing of good cause, to include in a domestic violence prevention order, a grant to the petitioner of the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner, respondent, household, or minor child in the residence. Existing law further allows the court to order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal. (Fam. Code Sec. 6320(b).) 5)Permits a person who has suffered civil harassment to seek a temporary restraining order or an injunction prohibiting the civil harassment. (Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 527.6 (a).) 6)Defines "harassment" as unlawful violence, a credible threat of violence, or a knowing and willful course of conduct AB 494 Page 3 directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, or harasses the person and serves no legitimate purpose. (Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 527.6 (b)(3).) 7)Defines "temporary restraining order" and "injunction" to mean orders that include any restraining order enjoining a party from harassing, intimidating, molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, abusing, telephoning, including but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls, destroying personal property, contacting either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, or coming within a specified distance of, or disturbing the peace of, the petitioner, or any order enjoining a party from specified behavior that is necessary to effectuate such restraint. (Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 527.6 (b)(6).) 8)Allows a juvenile court to issue a protective order on behalf of a dependent child or a ward of the state for a duration of up to three years. (Welf. & Inst. Code Sec. 213.5.) 9)Allows a court to issue a protective order on behalf of an elder or dependent adult for a duration of up to three years. (Welf. & Inst. Code Sec. 15657.03.) This bill allows a court, on a showing of good cause, to include in a protective order on behalf of a dependent adult, elder, juvenile dependent or ward, or a protective order prohibiting harassment, the following: 1)an order for exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by the petitioner, or residing in the residence or household of the person protected by the restraining order; and/or 2)an order to the respondent or person being restrained to stay AB 494 Page 4 away from the animal and refrain from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, molesting, attacking, striking, threatening, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal. Background In response to news articles describing the use of pets by abusers to control their victims, such as threatening to hurt an animal if a victim were to leave an abusive situation, the Legislature enacted AB 353 (Kuehl, Chapter 205, Statutes of 2007) which authorized courts to include protections for animals in domestic violence restraining orders. Domestic violence refers to abuse perpetrated against a spouse, former spouse, cohabitant or former cohabitant, or a person with whom the alleged abuser is having or has had a dating relationship, or a child of the alleged abuser. (Fam. Code Sec. 6211.) However, there are many relationships outside a "domestic" situation where individuals may seek a protective order from the court. Stalking, for example, is a crime of power and control. Stalking is defined as "a course of conduct directed at a specific person that involves repeated visual or physical proximity, nonconsensual communication, or verbal, written, or implied threats, or a combination thereof, that would cause a reasonable person fear." (Tjaden, Patricia and Nancy Thoennes. Stalking in America: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1998, NCJ 169592.U.S.) Stalking may also include leaving or sending the victim unwanted items or presents, following or lying in wait for the victim, damaging or threatening to damage the victim's property, or otherwise harassing the victim. Elders and dependent adults are also vulnerable to abuse, both physical and financial, from caretakers, family, and others who wish to abuse and/or extort a vulnerable adult. Finally, juvenile dependents and wards, many who have been removed from their homes because of abuse or neglect, often require protection from the court. AB 494 Page 5 This bill, seeking to protect individuals outside of domestic violence situations who may seek protective orders, expressly authorizes the court to include animals in those restraining orders. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:NoLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified6/11/15) Executive Committee of the Family Law Section of the State Bar (source) American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals California Animal Control Directors Association California District Attorneys Association California Partnership to End Domestic Violence City and County of San Francisco Humane Society of the United States State Humane Association of California One individual OPPOSITION: (Verified6/11/15) None received ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the author: In 2007, the Domestic Violence Prevention Act was amended to enable courts to add protection for companion animals in domestic violence restraining orders. However, the companion animal section of the Act does not apply to all forms of restraining orders. AB 494 will extend protections to companion animals of protected parties in restraining orders issued in juvenile dependency cases, civil harassment cases, and Elder Abuse cases. Civil harassment orders are often utilized by persons who are being stalked or were sexually AB 494 Page 6 assaulted by a non-intimate partner, or by persons who are being harassed by a neighbor. These individuals may have pets that also need protection from the person to be restrained. ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 4/16/15 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins NO VOTE RECORDED: Quirk Prepared by:Nichole Rapier / JUD. / (916) 651-4113 6/22/15 10:55:50 **** END ****