BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH Senator Ed Hernandez, O.D., Chair BILL NO: AB 503 --------------------------------------------------------------- |AUTHOR: |Rodriguez | |---------------+-----------------------------------------------| |VERSION: |March 23, 2015 | --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- |HEARING DATE: |July 1, 2015 | | | --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- |CONSULTANT: |Vince Marchand | --------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT : Emergency medical services. SUMMARY : Permits a hospital to release patient-identifiable medical information to an emergency medical services provider, to the local emergency medical services agency, or to the Emergency Medical Services Authority, for quality assessment and improvement purposes. Existing law: 1)Establishes the Emergency Medical Services Authority (EMSA), which is responsible for the coordination and integration of all state activities concerning emergency medical services (EMS), including the establishment of minimum standards, policies, and procedures. 2)Requires EMSA to develop planning and implementation guidelines for EMS systems which address specified components, including communications, system organization and management, and data collection and evaluation. 3)Authorizes counties to develop an EMS program and designate a local emergency medical services agency (LEMSA) responsible for planning and implementing an EMS system, which includes day-to-day EMS system operations. 4)Establishes an 18-member Commission on EMS, within the California Health and Human Services Agency. Defines the duties of the Commission to include reviewing regulations, standards, and guidelines developed by EMSA; advising EMSA on a data collection system; advise on emergency facilities and services, emergency communications, medical equipment, personnel training, and various aspects of the EMS system; and, to make recommendations for further development of the AB 503 (Rodriguez) Page 2 of ? EMS system. 5)Requires the Commission on EMS to review and approve regulations, standards and guidelines to be developed by EMSA for implementation of the EMS System and the Prehospital Emergency Medical Care Personnel Act. 6)Defines "Emergency Medical Technician-I" or "EMT-I" as an individual trained in all facets of basic life support, as specified. Defines an "Emergency Medical Technician-II," "EMT-II," "Advanced Emergency Medical Technician," or "Advanced EMT" as an EMT-I with additional training in limited advanced life support according to specified standards. Both EMT-Is and EMT-IIs are certified by local EMS agencies. 7)Defines "Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic," "EMT-P," "paramedic" or "mobile intensive care paramedic" means an individual whose scope of practice includes the ability to provide advanced life support, as specified, including administering specified medications. EMT-Ps are licensed and regulated at the state level through EMSA. This bill: 1)Permits a general acute care or psychiatric hospital to release patient-identifiable medical information under the following circumstances: a) To an EMS provider, information regarding a patient who was treated, or transported to the hospital by, that EMS provider, to the extent that specific data elements are requested for quality assessment and improvement purposes; and, b) To EMSA or to the LEMSA, to the extent that specific data elements are requested for quality assessment and improvement purposes. 2)Defines an "EMS provider," for purposes of this bill, as an organization employing an Emergency Medical Technician-I, Advanced Emergency Medical Technician, or Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic for the delivery of emergency medical care to the sick and injured at the scene of an emergency, during transport, or during an interfacility transfer. AB 503 (Rodriguez) Page 3 of ? 3)Limits an EMS provider, LEMSA, or EMSA to requesting only those data elements that are minimally necessary, in compliance with specified provisions of federal regulations governing the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule. 4)Requires EMSA to develop minimum standards for the implementation of data collection for system operation, patient outcome, and performance quality improvement. 5)States the intent of the Legislature to encourage data sharing between EMS providers and hospitals in order to improve system effectiveness, quality of care, and the impact of EMS on death and disability. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, this bill will result in minor staff costs to EMSA to revise existing regulations, estimated at around $20,000 (existing federal grant funds). PRIOR VOTES : ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Assembly Floor: |78 - 0 | |------------------------------------+----------------------------| |Assembly Appropriations Committee: |16 - 0 | |------------------------------------+----------------------------| |Assembly Health Committee: |17 - 0 | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENTS : 1)Author's statement. According to the author, pre-hospital EMS providers, such as ambulance companies, need patient-identifiable outcome information to evaluate the effectiveness of their clinical and operational procedures in order to improve patient care outcomes. Hospitals also rely on such information to improve their patient safety and quality outcomes, particularly for emergency service programs such as trauma, stroke, and heart attacks. HIPAA regulations permit hospitals to release patient-identifiable medical information to pre-hospital emergency medical services providers for quality assessment and improvement purposes AB 503 (Rodriguez) Page 4 of ? about a patient that the hospital and the pre-hospital provider have in common. HIPAA regulations also permit hospitals to release patient-identifiable medical information to government health care oversight agencies. However, state law does not explicitly permit such disclosures to EMS providers. This bill seeks to explicitly permit these EMS disclosures in state law. 2)HIPAA Privacy Rule. HIPAA was enacted in 1996 in order to improve portability and continuity of health insurance coverage, to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in health insurance and health care delivery, and to simplify the administration of health insurance, among other purposes. Title II of HIPAA, and its ensuing implementing regulations, focused on combatting waste fraud and abuse, as well as administrative simplification. One of the major set of provisions of Title II is known as the "Privacy Rule," which regulates the use and disclosure of "protected health information" (PHI, which is basically any information concerning health or health care that can be linked to an individual) that is held by "covered entities" (which include health insurers and medical service providers, among others). The Privacy Rule governs when covered entities are permitted to use or disclose PHI, and specifies that a covered entity is permitted to use or disclose PHI for treatment, payment, or "health care operations." In the case of disclosure for health care operations, the entity that receives the information must be another covered entity that has had a relationship with the individual who is the subject of the PHI. Health care operations are defined as, among other activities, "conducting quality assessment and improvement activities, including outcomes evaluation and development of clinical guidelines." 3)Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA). The California Civil Code contains an extensive body of law on medical privacy, known as the CMIA. While the HIPAA Privacy Rule preempts state law where state law is contrary to federal regulations, the HIPAA Privacy Rule does provide for an exception to this preemption where state law is more protective of privacy rights. Under the CMIA, a health care provider, health plan, or contractor is prohibited from disclosing medical information regarding a patient without first obtaining an authorization from the patient, with specified exceptions. Among the various exceptions in the CMIA that permit the disclosure of medical information, are the AB 503 (Rodriguez) Page 5 of ? following: a) Information may be disclosed to providers of health care, health plans, contractors, or other health care professionals or facilities for the purposes of diagnosis or treatment, and this specifically includes, in an emergency situation, the communication of patient information between emergency medical personnel at the scene of an emergency, and emergency medical personnel at a health facility; b) Information may be disclosed to organized committees and agents of professional societies or of medical staffs of licensed hospitals, licensed health care service plans, professional standards review organizations, independent medical review organizations, utilization and quality control peer review organizations, if these entities are engaged in reviewing the competence or qualifications of health care professionals or in reviewing health care services with respect to medical necessity, level of care, or justification of charges; and, c) Information may be disclosed to public agencies, clinical investigators, health care research organizations, and accredited public or private educational or health care institutions for bona fide research purposes. d) Information in the possession of a provider of health care or health plan may be reviewed by a private or public body responsible for licensing or accrediting the provider of health care or health plan, however, no patient-identifying medical information can be removed from the premises. 4)NEMSIS and CEMSIS. NEMSIS was formed in 2001 by the National Association of State EMS Directors, in conjunction with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Trauma/EMS Systems program of the Health Resources and Services Administration's Maternal Child Health Bureau, in order to develop a national EMS database. NEMSIS is the national repository that will be used to potentially store EMS data from every state in the nation, and was developed to help states collect more standardized elements to allow submission to the national database. According to EMSA, CEMSIS is a demonstration project for AB 503 (Rodriguez) Page 6 of ? improving EMS data analysis across California. CEMSIS offers a secure, centralized data system for collecting data about individual EMS requests, patients treated at hospitals, and EMS provider organizations. EMSA states that at least 14 of California's 33 LEMSAs currently send a variety of local data collections to CEMSIS on a voluntary basis, and in return, these local agencies gain access to digital tools for running comprehensive reports on their own data at no cost. EMSA states when fully operational with 100 percent local participation, it is estimated that CEMSIS will catalogue more than three million EMS events per year. According to EMSA, it will use the data to develop and coordinate high quality emergency medical care in California through activities such as healthcare quality programs that monitor patient care outcomes, agency collaboration across jurisdictional boundaries, and public health surveillance. In order to improve local data quality and prepare California EMS for health information exchange, EMSA is planning to adopt new data standards known as NEMSIS Version 3, which will provide a set of tools that EMS professionals can use to integrate EMS patient care data with electronic medical records at hospitals, leading to better patient outcomes and a smarter system of care. On October 1, 2014, the NEMSIS Technical Advisory Committee announced that California was the first state to successfully transmit NEMSIS Version 3 EMS data to the national repository using field and state level software "certified compliant" with the NEMSIS V3 standard. According to EMSA, through its partnership with the Inland Counties Emergency Medical Agency, test data from three different software vendors was sent to NEMSIS. 5)Related legislation. AB 1129 (Burke), requires an emergency medical care provider, when submitting data to a LEMSA, to use an electronic health record system that is compatible with specified standards, and that includes those data elements that are required by the LEMSA. Prohibits a LEMSA from mandating that a provider use a specific electronic health record system. This bill is scheduled to be heard in this committee on July 1, 2015. 6)Prior legislation. AB 1621 (Lowenthal, 2014), would have required the EMSA to adopt a single statewide standard for the collection of information regarding pre-hospital care for CEMSIS, required EMSA to develop standards for electronic AB 503 (Rodriguez) Page 7 of ? patient care records systems used by LEMSAs and local pre-hospital EMS providers to ensure compatibility with CEMSIS, and required LEMSAs to submit patient information to EMSA utilizing the single statewide standard in a timely manner. AB 1621 was held on the Senate Appropriations Committee suspense file. AB 1975 (R. Hernández, 2014) would have required LEMSAs to contract with the American College of Surgeons every five years to conduct a comprehensive assessment of their regional trauma system. AB 1975 was held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee suspense file. SB 535 (Nielsen, 2013) would have increased the membership of the EMS Commission from 18 to 20 members, and required the additional members to be an air ambulance representative appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules, and representative appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly from a public agency that provides air rescue and transport. SB 535 was vetoed by the Governor. 7)Double referral. This bill is double referred. Should it pass out of this committee, it will be referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. 8)Support. This bill is sponsored by the California Hospital Association (CHA), which states that public policy should permit and encourage quality improvement activities between providers and hospitals to improve quality and patient safety and ultimately improve emergency patient survival rates. CHA states that this bill would permit hospitals to release patient-identifiable medical information to pre-hospital EMS providers, such as ambulance companies, and the LEMSA, for quality assessment and patient care improvement purposes. CHA states that improved pre-hospital care from continuous quality improvement initiatives will result in patients needing less expensive emergency and inpatient care, leading to potential cost savings. The California Ambulance Association states in support that obtaining this data would help the patient by improving the quality of care provided, and that state law does not explicitly permit these disclosures. 9)Opposition. The Emergency Medical Services Administrators Association of California (EMSAAC) states in opposition that it is concerned that this bill will actually limit a LEMSA's AB 503 (Rodriguez) Page 8 of ? access to hospital data. EMSAAC states that LEMSAs rely extensively on dispatch, prehospital care records, hospital records, and trauma registries to fulfil their statutory mandate to evaluate the local EMS system and improve the speed and effectiveness of prehospital, receiving hospital, and specialty care center services. According to EMSAAC, if this bill becomes law, hospitals may choose not to provide LEMSAs with the hospital patient treatment data needed to effectively evaluate the EMS system, including critical trauma registry data. 10)Author's amendments. The author intends to offer the following two amendments to address issues that have been brought to their attention: a) Air ambulances have pointed out that because they employ registered nurses and physicians instead of EMTs, they are not covered under the definition of "EMS provider." The author intends to offer the following amendment on page 2, line 29: (d) For purposes of this section, "EMS provider" means an organization employing an Emergency Medical Technician-I, Advanced Emergency Medical Technician, registered nurse, physician, or Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic for the delivery of emergency medical care to the sick and injured at the scene of an emergency, during transport, or during an interfacility transfer. b) A concern has been raised that by requiring EMSA to develop minimum standards for the implementation of data collection, this could be interpreted to mean that hospital would not be able to share information until these standards have been adopted as regulations. The author intends to address this issue by offering the following amendment on page 2, line 26: (c) The authorityshallmay develop minimum standards for the line 27 implementation of data collection for system operation, patient line 28 outcome, and performance quality improvement. 11)Policy discussion. Both CHA (the sponsor) and EMSAAC (which opposes this bill) agree that many hospitals are currently providing this information to LEMSAs, though it varies by AB 503 (Rodriguez) Page 9 of ? county and by hospital. CHA has expressed some concern that while providing this information is permitted under federal HIPAA regulations, HIPAA also permits states to have more restrictive privacy protections, and since this disclosure is not specifically authorized, the legality of these disclosure are in doubt. As discussed above, the CMIA permits the disclosure of medical information for the purposes of diagnosis or treatment, including in an emergency situation between EMS providers and the hospital. Additionally, the CMIA permits medical information to be disclosed to public agencies for bona fide research purposes. Finally, medical information that is in the possession of a provider of health care "may be reviewed by a private or public body responsible for licensing or accrediting the provider of health care?however, no patient-identifying medical information may be removed from the premises?nor shall that information be further disclosed by the recipient?" In sum, the proponents assert that while the disclosures proposed by this bill are expressly permitted by HIPAA, California law is not as clear. While one could point to the various provisions in the CMIA that permit disclosure, and argue that one or more of those provisions cover the disclosure of this information from the hospital to the LEMSA, and perhaps in some instances to the EMS providers as well, the purpose of this bill is to remove any doubt. EMSAAC, on the other hand, representing LEMSAs, assert that they are already allowed to obtain this information from hospitals, and do so routinely. EMSAAC's concern is that this bill is expressly making this disclosure permissive, rather than a requirement, which might result in some hospitals refusing to continue disclosing information because of the cost. EMSAAC says this might be even more likely, because by expressly authorizing ambulance companies and other EMS providers to request this information, hospitals may become inundated with disclosure requests, and decide to just stop providing this information. SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION : Support: California Hospital Association (sponsor) Association of California Healthcare Districts California Ambulance Association Dignity Health Paramedics Plus AB 503 (Rodriguez) Page 10 of ? Oppose: Emergency Medical Services Administrators Association of California -- END --