BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 503


                                                                    Page  1


          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS


          AB  
          503 (Rodriguez)


          As Amended  July 7, 2015


          Majority vote


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  | 78-0 | (April 23,    |SENATE: |36-0  | (August 27,     |
          |           |      |2015)          |        |      |2015)            |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Original Committee Reference:  HEALTH


          SUMMARY:  Allows a health facility to release  
          patient-identifiable medical information to an emergency medical  
          services (EMS) provider and to a local emergency medical  
          services agency (LEMSA) when specific data elements are  
          requested for the purpose of quality assessment and improvement.  
           Authorizes the Emergency Medical Services Authority (EMSA) to  
          develop minimum standards for the implementation of this data  
          collection system.


          The Senate amendments:


          1)Add registered nurse and physician to the definition of EMS  
            provider for the purposes of this bill.


          2)Authorize instead of require EMSA to develop minimum standards  








                                                                     AB 503


                                                                    Page  2


            for the implementation of this data collection system.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.


          COMMENTS:  According to the author, prehospital providers of  
          emergency medical care or transport, such as ambulance  
          companies, need patient-identifiable outcomes in order to  
          evaluate the effectiveness of their clinical and operational  
          procedures to improve patient care and outcomes.  The author  
          further states that public policy should permit and encourage  
          quality improvement and systems effectiveness between hospitals  
          and prehospital emergency service providers.  The author argues  
          that while federal law allows this to occur, state law does not  
          and this bill would allow such disclosures to occur under state  
          law.


          In 2012, EMSA received a grant from the California HealthCare  
          Foundation (CHCF) to increase the accessibility and accuracy of  
          prehospital data for public, policy, academic and research  
          purposes to facilitate system evaluation and improvement.  The  
          grant included a review of EMSA's existing system, the  
          development of a core measures program, and engagement with  
          LEMSAs to facilitate uniform reporting.  As part of the project,  
          EMSA has begun implementation of the new national data standards  
          and integrating electronic health information systems.


          The CHCF-funded projected revealed:  1) that the existing system  
          had a number of weaknesses that made it difficult for EMSA to  
          validate EMS information for reporting, impacting its  
          suitability for statewide sustainability and transition to the  
          new national data standards; 2) that variability in data  
          collection methodology (in some cases related to the use of  
          paper vs. electronic patient records) limited the usefulness of  
          data submitted; and, 3) the lack of hospital outcome data,  
          particularly for cardiac arrest cases limited the ability of  
          LEMSAs to obtain universal outcome data.  The capacity of the  
          current system was also assessed by the Health Services Advisory  








                                                                     AB 503


                                                                    Page  3


          Group, an External Quality Review Organization network  
          contractor, which found similar weaknesses to those identified  
          in the CHCF core measures project.  The recommendations for EMSA  
          included better standardization of data collection from LEMSAs.


          The sponsor of this bill, the California Hospital Association  
          (CHA), writes in support that prehospital EMS providers, such as  
          ambulance companies, need patient-identifiable outcome  
          information to evaluate the effectiveness of their clinical and  
          operational procedures to improve their patent safety and  
          quality outcomes, particularly for emergency services programs  
          such as trauma, stroke, and STEMI (ST segment elevation  
          myocardial infarction - a type of heart attack).  CHA maintains  
          that public policy should permit and encourage quality  
          improvement activities between providers and hospitals to  
          improve quality and patient safety and ultimately improve  
          emergency patient survival rates.


          This bill has no opposition.


          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Patty Rodgers / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097  FN:  
          0001354