BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 508


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:   January 21, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          508 (Cristina Garcia) - As Amended January 13, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       | Health                        |Vote:| 19-0        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill requires the California Department of Public Health  
          (CDPH) to annually publish a report on maternal mortality and  
          morbidity, and specifies factors the department must analyze.  


          It also requires the department to support efforts of  
          private-public collaboration to collect and analyze data and  
          complete the report.  








                                                                     AB 508


                                                                    Page  2







          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)In absence of another fund source, there would be significant  
            GF costs to the Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health  
            division of CDPH to complete this annual study, likely in the  
            range of several hundred thousand dollars to the low millions  
            annually.  The low end of the range would assume use of  
            publicly available data and a lower level of analytical depth,  
            while the high end would assume significant costs for novel  
            data collection and higher analytical complexity.  The bill is  
            fairly broad in its requirements, so the robustness and cost  
            of implementation would depend on administrative and  
            legislative decisions about resource availability for this  
            purpose.


          2)CDPH would also likely incur, on a one-time basis, some level  
            of infrastructure capacity enhancement in order to process and  
            store data.  For example, new databases, automated processes  
            or new computer hardware may be required.  The level of  
            one-time costs would increase commensurate with the complexity  
            of the effort as described above.  Higher one-time costs- for  
            example, to automate certain processes- could also potentially  
            reduce ongoing personnel costs, depending on the approach  
            chosen.


          3)Depending on the availability and approval of federal Title V  
            funds for this purpose, federal funds could potentially be  
            used instead of GF.  Approximately $39 million in federal  
            Title V funds are available to California annually. Funding  
            decisions are based partially on a federally required needs  
            assessment, and these monies currently fund other maternal,  
            child, and adolescent health priorities, including $8 million  
            for state operations and $31 million for local assistance  
            annually. 








                                                                     AB 508


                                                                    Page  3







          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. According to the author, although California's trends  
            are among the best in the country, maternal mortality and  
            morbidity remain unacceptably high.  The author points to past  
            successes in reducing maternal mortality by CDPH's attention  
            to the issue, analysis of data, and collaborative  
            problem-solving with the health care delivery system.  The  
            author believes the annual report required by this bill will  
            assist the state to further reduce dangerous complications  
            from pregnancy and childbirth.


          2)Background.  The CDPH administers the California  
            Pregnancy-Associated Mortality Review (CA-PAMR) in  
            collaboration with private sector efforts. CA-PAMR reviews  
            information related to maternal deaths and translates findings  
            into quality improvement projects.  


            The department regularly reports trends in maternal mortality,  
            but no longer conducts case review of each maternal death.   
            The most recent report notes a sustained decline in maternal  
            mortality from 2008 until 2013, while national rates rose.   
            The national rate is nearly three times California's rate,  
            although health disparities persist in the state. Notably,  
            African-American women in California are three to four times  
            more likely to die from maternal causes than whites.  


            CDPH efforts appear to focus on mortality, not morbidity.   
            According to the World Health Organization (WHO), maternal  
            death (mortality) is defined as "the death of a woman while  
            pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy,  
            irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, from  
            any cause related to or aggravated by pregnancy or its  








                                                                     AB 508


                                                                    Page  4





            management but not from accidental or incidental causes.   
            "Pregnancy-related death" is also used in this field to  
            indicate the same, but it refers to death while pregnant or  
            within one year of the termination of pregnancy.  


            In addition to maternal mortality, this bill requires study of  
            morbidity, including study of all instances of complications  
            from pregnancy.  Pregnancy-related complications and maternal  
            morbidity are fairly broad terms.  The WHO Maternal Morbidity  
            Working Group defines maternal morbidity as "any health  
            condition attributed to, and/or aggravated by, pregnancy and  
            childbirth that has a negative impact on the woman's  
            wellbeing."  The Center for Disease Control and Prevention  
            (CDC) idenifies "severe maternal morbidity" through delivery  
            hospitalization data and medical codes that indicate a  
            potentially life-threatening maternal condition or  
            complication. Severe postpartum hemorrhage is an example of  
            severe maternal morbidity. The CDC lists the following as  
            potential pregnancy complications: obesity and weight gain,  
            high blood pressure, gestational diabetes, mental health  
            conditions, anemia, and urinary tract infections.    


          3)Staff Comment. There is surely merit in analyzing various  
            pregnancy complications and all types of maternal morbidity  
            for their potential effects on women's health, but if the  
            intent is to concentrate resources on the conditions with the  
            greatest potential for harm or loss of life, the author may  
            wish to consider narrowing the bill somewhat.  For example,  
            the bill could be narrowed to require study of severe maternal  
            morbidity instead of maternal morbidity and pregnancy  
            complications generally.  Another alternative is to require  
            study of factors contributing to pregnancy-related deaths as  
            defined above, instead of all complications.  Yet another  
            option would be to require a baseline study that includes  
            review of all complications, but require an annual or biennial  
            study to focus on those complications with the greatest  
            potential for severe health outcomes.  Narrowing the bill  








                                                                     AB 508


                                                                    Page  5





            could provide more direction to the department about what is  
            most important to study, as well as reduce costs.  


          Analysis Prepared by:Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081