BILL ANALYSIS Ó
AB 514
Page 1
GOVERNOR'S VETO
AB
514 (Williams)
As Enrolled September 4, 2015
2/3 vote
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: | |(May 22, 2015) |SENATE: | |(August 31, |
| |47-27 | | |25-15 |2015) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: | |(September 2, | | | |
| |52-28 |2015) | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Committee Reference: L. GOV.
AB 514
Page 2
SUMMARY: Allows counties to assess larger administrative fines
for specified violations of county ordinances that govern
building and safety, brush removal, grading, film permitting,
and zoning.
FISCAL EFFECT: None
COMMENTS:
1)Bill Summary. This bill allows counties to assess larger
administrative fines for violations of a number of specified
county ordinances, if the violation is determined to be an
infraction and is a one-time violation. The specified
ordinances include those that govern building and safety,
brush removal, grading, film permitting, and zoning.
The fine must be based on the severity of the threat to public
health and safety, and shall not exceed the following:
-------------------------------------------------------------
|Number of |Amount of fine if a |Amount of fine in |
|violations within |permit fee exists |the absence of a |
|specified time | |permit fee |
|periods | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|------------------+---------------------+--------------------|
|First violation |Fine does not exceed |Fine does not |
| |$5,000 or the amount |exceed $1,000 |
| |of the permit fee | |
| |required by the | |
| |ordinance multiplied | |
| |by three, whichever | |
| |is less | |
| | | |
AB 514
Page 3
| | | |
|------------------+---------------------+--------------------|
|Second violation |Fine does not exceed |Fine does not |
|within five years |$10,000 or the |exceed $2,500 |
|of first |amount of the permit | |
|violation |fee required by the | |
| |ordinance multiplied | |
| |by five, whichever | |
| |is less | |
| | | |
| | | |
|------------------+---------------------+--------------------|
|Third violation |Fine is greater than |Fine does not |
|and subsequent |$10,000 but does not |exceed $5,000 |
|violations within |exceed $15,000 | |
|five years of | | |
|first violation | | |
| | | |
| | | |
-------------------------------------------------------------
A county shall not assess an administrative fine of more than
$500 unless both of the following findings are made in the
administrative record prior to the assessment of the fine:
a) The person who violated the ordinance did so willingly
or the violation resulted in an unusual and significant
threat to the public health and safety; and,
b) The payment of the administrative fine would not impose
an undue financial hardship on the person responsible for
the payment.
This bill defines a one-time violation to mean a violation
that is not a continuing violation and cannot be corrected or
AB 514
Page 4
cured, including, but not limited to, a violation of permit
conditions or a use violation. This bill is sponsored by the
Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors.
2)Author's Statement. According to the author, "AB 514 will
provide counties with more local control to impose fines for
specific violations of the County's Land Use and Development
codes, specifically where permits are available.
"The Land Use and Development codes focus on events that have
over 300 people attending, if there is potential public
disturbance, and/or a structure is built that would alter the
local landscape. The current small fines for violations of
forgoing permits do not provide disincentives for violations
of the Land Use and Development codes for special events
(parties, weddings, and film shoots) and conditions for
construction hours and days.
"AB 514 creates a reasonable deterrence mechanism and provides
counties with more control to enforce local health and safety
ordinances."
3)Background. Local governments have the authority to enact
local planning and land use regulations to protect the public
health, safety, and welfare of their residents through their
police power. The "police power" provides the right to adopt
and enforce zoning regulations, as long as they do not
conflict with state laws.
Current law allows cities and counties to establish ordinances
and makes violations of ordinances misdemeanors, unless they
are made infractions via ordinance adopted by the city or
county. Existing law outlines the following fine structure
for ordinance violations and building and safety code
violations that are determined to be infractions:
-------------------------------------------------------------
AB 514
Page 5
|Number of |Amount of fine for |Amount of fine for |
|violations within |ordinance violations |building and safety |
|specified time | |code violations |
|periods | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|------------------+---------------------+--------------------|
|First violation |Fine does not exceed |Fine does not |
| |$100 |exceed $100 |
| | | |
| | | |
|------------------+---------------------+--------------------|
|Second violation |Fine does not exceed |Fine does not |
|within one year |$200 |exceed $500 |
|of first | | |
|violation | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|------------------+---------------------+--------------------|
|Third violation |Fine does not exceed |Fine does not |
|within one year |$500 |exceed $1,000 |
|of first | | |
|violation | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
-------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors,
the sponsor of this bill, these fines are too low to provide
incentives for individuals to obtain proper permits. The
sponsor notes that this code section was updated in 2003 to
account for inflation, but has not been updated since. The
sponsor contends that the fines are so low that many property
owners find it easier to violate the county's land use and
development codes and pay the low fine than to obtain a
permit.
AB 514
Page 6
4)Arguments in Support. The Santa Barbara County Board of
Supervisors, sponsor of this bill, states, "AB 514 gives local
governments the authority to raise local fines for violators
of land use codes who did not obtain a permit where one is
available? The current maximum allowable fine amount is
insufficient to deter violators of the Land Use Enforcement
Codes, and allows entities to visit a County without being
appropriately accountable to land use codes."
5)Arguments in Opposition. None on file.
GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE:
This bill increases the maximum amount of administrative fines
and penalties that counties can impose for violations of certain
local ordinances.
The public's health and safety is compromised when people
willfully violate county ordinances. Deterring such behavior is
a worthwhile goal. This bill, however, lacks the balance needed
to prevent unintended consequences, especially on those with
modest means and those who are unfamiliar with their local
ordinances.
Analysis Prepared by:
Angela Mapp / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958 FN:
0002471
AB 514
Page 7