BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 532| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 532 Author: McCarty (D), et al. Amended: 9/3/15 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE: 10-2, 6/29/15 AYES: Hall, Block, Gaines, Glazer, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Lara, McGuire, Vidak NOES: Berryhill, Runner NO VOTE RECORDED: Galgiani SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 6-1, 8/27/15 AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen NOES: Bates ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 5/26/15 (Consent) - See last page for vote SUBJECT: State agencies: collection of data: race or ethnic origin SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill requires any state agency, board, or commission that collects demographic data to provide forms that offer respondents the option of selecting one or more ethnic or racial designations. Senate Floor Amendments of 9/3/15 add a provision clarifying that any state entity that collects ethnic or racial data solely to comply with federal requirements may continue to collect and report that data to any other state entity in the form required by the federal government. AB 532 Page 2 ANALYSIS: Existing law requires a state agency, board, or commission that directly, or by contract, collects demographic data as to the ancestry or ethnic origin of Californians, to use separate collection categories and tabulations for each major Asian group and each major Pacific Islander group. This data is required to be made available to the public in accordance with state and federal law, except for personal identifying information, which shall be deemed confidential. This bill: 1)Requires state agencies, boards, or commissions that directly or by contract collect demographic data on ethnic origin, ethnicity, or race of Californians to provide forms that offer respondents the option of selecting one or more ethnic or racial designations. 2)Requires state agencies, boards, or commissions when reporting respondent data to any other state agency, board, or commission to tabulate and report all of the following: a) The number or percentage of respondents who identify with each ethnic or racial designation alone and not in combination with any other ethnic or racial designation. b) The number or percentage of respondents who identify with each ethnic or racial designation, whether alone or in combination with other ethnic or racial designations. c) The number or percentage of respondents who identify with multiple ethnic or racial designations. d) Federally mandated actions related to civil rights monitoring and enforcement. 3)Requires state agencies, boards, or commissions to comply as early as reasonably feasible when updating forms, software, hardware, or collection procedures, but no later than January 1, 2022. AB 532 Page 3 4)Permits any state agency, board, or commission that collects demographic data from a local entity to continue to collect and report that data in the form the local entity submits. 5)Clarifies that any state agency, board, or commission that collects ethnic or racial data solely to comply with federal requirements may continue to collect and report that data to any other state agency, board, or commission in the form required by the federal government. 6)Contains legislative findings and declarations relative to the fact that California has the largest population of people in the United States who identify with more than one ethnicity race and that many state forms require respondents to choose only a single ethnicity or race which forces multiracial Californians to deny a significant portion of their heritage which in turn deprives the state of accurate data with which to meet the needs of its diverse communities. Background Purpose of AB 532. Existing law sets minimum requirements but does not limit the amount of demographic data state entities may collect. Current collection forms seek to provide multiple racial designations from which an individual may select more than one designation to express their racial identity. Difficulty arises, however, when an individual finds that their racial identity cannot be accurately expressed through the limited number of racial designations listed on the forms. The author's office points out that, "in 1997 the federal government revised its Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity - since then, federal agencies have been required to ensure that multiracial individuals have the option of selecting one or more ethnic or racial designations on federal government forms requesting such data." The author's office also reports that "over the past ten years, considerable research has been conducted on the population segment reporting multiple races, and the fact that people may identify themselves as being more than one race has become a common part of discussions and understanding of race and ethnicity. Results from the 2010 Census provided new AB 532 Page 4 information on the two or more races population in the United States and, for the first time, enabled comparisons of this population from two major data points." According to the author's office, "current data collection practices can be unfair and offensive to the rapidly increasing population of Californians who identify with more than one ethnicity or race. Roughly one in six births overall in the state and one in four births to native-born mothers is multiracial/ethnic. While many state agencies have taken the initiative to put in place measures to recognize this reality, many multiracial Californians are still forced to deny significant parts of their racial and ethnic identity on state forms when they are required to select only one ethnic or racial designation." The author's office emphasizes that "by allowing multiracial Californians the choice of selecting one or more ethnic/racial designations, AB 532 will give policymakers, service providers, health practitioners and others a truer picture of the state's diversity." Prior/Related Legislation AB 1088 (Eng, Chapter 689, Statutes of 2011) required certain state agencies to collect and tabulate data for additional major Asian groups, as listed, in order to better reflect the diversity of Asian American, Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities in California. AB 1281 (Portantino, 2009) would have enacted the California School Racial Equality Designation Act and required any state agency, board, or commission that directly, or by contract, collects demographic data on the race or ethnicity of pupils in any elementary or secondary school to provide written instructions for reporting racial information that specify that multiracial pupils may select 2 or more racial categories. (Vetoed - Governor's message stated the California Department of Education has already put into place processes to update forms and instructions to accommodate the inclusion of multiracial students. Therefore, this bill is unnecessary.) AB 532 Page 5 SB 26 (Simitian, 2007) would have enacted the "Ethnic Heritage Respect and Recognition Act of 2007" requiring any state entity that collects demographic data on the ancestry, ethnic origin, ethnicity, or race of Californians to provide forms that offer respondents the option of selecting one or more ethnic or racial designations. (Died in Assembly Appropriations) SB 1615 (Simitian, 2006) would have enacted the Ethnic Heritage Respect and Recognition Act to require any state agency, board, or commission that directly or by contract collects demographic data, as soon as reasonably feasible and in no event later than January 1, 2014, to provide forms that offer respondents the option of selecting one more ethnic or racial designation according to specified federal standards. (Died in Senate Appropriations) AB 2324 (Chan, 2004), among other things, would have required each state program directly involved in furnishing information to, or rendering services to, the public to collect data regarding the race, ethnicity, and primary language of all participants, on a voluntary basis. (Died in Assembly Appropriations) FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, unknown, but significant overall costs to comply with the bill's mandates. Many state entities report minor and absorbable costs to comply by 2022, and many others are unaffected by the bill because they don't collect demographic data. The following entities that provided information would have significant costs: The Department of Human Resources and the State Personnel Board (CalHR) estimates costs in the range of $250,000 (General Fund), primarily associated with programming duties to update systems. The Administrative Office of the Courts (Judicial Council) indicates that several of the mandated duties of the courts require the collection of demographic data. AB 532 Page 6 Some of these procedures either currently allow for multiple racial or ethnic designations, or could be updated in the normal course of business by 2022. Courts also collect race data on criminal defendants through case management systems, most of which offer the option to identify as "multiracial" or "other," but not to select more than one designation. Costs to update 58 separate case management systems are unknown, but likely significant. (Trial Court Trust Fund) Unknown costs to the Employment Development Department (EDD), potentially in the range of $1 million (General Fund). EDD indicated costs related to the May 20 version of the bill would be approximately $6.5 million, largely attributable to costs to add a new "multiractial" designation to multiple IT systems and programs. The author's amendments adopted by this committee would remove the option for respondents to identify as multiracial, so staff assumes the initial identified costs will be substantially decreased. Updated fiscal estimates from EDD are currently unavailable. SUPPORT: (Verified 9/4/15) California Immigrant Policy Center Project RACE OPPOSITION: (Verified 9/4/15) None received ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Writing in support, the California Immigrant Policy Center states that "Current data collection practices not only create a false picture of the state's diversity but also set up a situation where accurate, reliable information is not available to doctors, teachers, service providers, and policymakers. For example, there is an increasing awareness in the healthcare community that intake forms requiring people to mark 'only one race' can prevent doctors from providing culturally appropriate and medically relevant information to their multiracial patients." AB 532 Page 7 Also writing in support, Project RACE states, "We support legislation that includes self-identification and a multiracial identifier or check box on forms that require racial and ethnic information. We support AB 532 as written." ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 5/26/15 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins NO VOTE RECORDED: Bloom, Chávez, Harper, Mathis Prepared by:Arthur Terzakis / G.O. / (916) 651-1530 9/4/15 10:48:02 **** END ****