BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 552| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 552 Author: O'Donnell (D) Amended: 7/16/15 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE: 13-0, 6/9/15 AYES: Hall, Berryhill, Block, Gaines, Galgiani, Glazer, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Lara, McGuire, Runner, Vidak SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 7-0, 7/14/15 AYES: Jackson, Moorlach, Anderson, Hertzberg, Leno, Monning, Wieckowski SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8 ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 5/11/15 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Public works contracts: damages SOURCE: Construction Employers Association DIGEST: This bill provides that any state or local public works contract, entered into on or after January 1, 2016, that contains a clause that expressly requires a contractor to be responsible for delay damages is not enforceable unless the delay damages have been liquidated to a set amount and identified in the public works contract. ANALYSIS: Existing law: AB 552 Page 2 1)Provides that for a breach of contract the proper measure of damages, except where otherwise provided by statute, is the amount which will compensate the party aggrieved for all the detriment proximately caused by the breach, or which in the ordinary course of things, would be likely to result from the breach. (Civil Code Section 3300.) 2)Provides that a provision in a contract liquidating the damages for the breach of the contract is valid unless the party seeking to invalidate the provision establishes that the provision was unreasonable under circumstances existing at the time the contract was made. (Civil Code Section 1671 (b).) 3)Requires every state contract to contain a provision in regard to the time when the whole or any specified portion of the work contemplated shall be completed, and shall provide that for each day completion is delayed beyond the specified time, the contractor shall forfeit and pay to the state a specified sum of money, to be deducted from any payments due or to become due to the contractor. The sum so specified is valid as liquidated damages unless manifestly unreasonable under the circumstances existing at the time the contract was made. (Public Contract Code Section 10226.) This bill: 1)Provides that a public works contract entered into on or after January 1, 2016, that contains a clause expressly requiring a contractor to be responsible for delay damages is not enforceable unless the delay damages have been liquidated to a set amount and identified in the public works contract. 2)Defines "public agency" for purposes of this bill to include the state, the Regents of the University of California, a city, charter city, county, charter county, district, public authority, municipal utility, and any other political subdivision or public corporation of the state. 3)Defines "delay damages" to mean damages incurred by the public agency for each day after the date on which the work was to be completed by the contractor pursuant to the public works AB 552 Page 3 contract. Delay damages shall not include damages incurred by a public agency after the filing of a notice of completion or, in the absence of a notice of completion, the acceptance by the public agency of the public work as complete. 4)Stipulates that the provisions of this bill shall not be construed to limit a right or remedy that the public agency has to enforce the express terms of the public works contract, except for delay damages. 5)Makes findings and declarations relative to the need for clear and uniform guidelines for imposing delay damages in a public works contracts. Background Purpose of AB 552. When a public agency enters into a contract for a public works project with a contractor, the agency generally includes provisions for charging the contractor for damages due to delays or nonperformance of the contract. These liquidated damages are specified within the contract and agreed to upon signing of the contract. According to the author's office, this bill is intended to address a troubling trend concerning public works construction contracts. Specifically, the author's office points out that a number of public agencies have begun utilizing contract provisions that call for both liquidated damages and unlimited consequential damages as penalties for project delays in their public works contracts. Liquidated damages are specific sums of money stipulated by the parties and written into the contract as the amount of damages to be recovered by a party in the event of a breach by the other party. Consequential damages, which may or may not be referenced in the contract, allow the non-breaching party to recover damages not only for the value of the non-performed part of the contract, but for any losses that flow from the consequences of breach, so long as such consequences were reasonably foreseeable at the time the contract was made. According to the author's office, unlike liquidated damages, AB 552 Page 4 which are insurable, defined in contract and are intended to cover actual projected damages, consequential damages are uninsurable, open-ended and speculative. The author's office contends that inclusion of consequential damages provisions raises construction costs, chills participation by mid and small-sized contractors and subcontractors, and increases litigation costs. Additionally, the author's office states that having a measurable penalty rather than an open-ended penalty is an important condition for insurers providing surety bonds for projects. The author's office notes that no business can reasonably assume open-ended, undefined and uninsurable risk and that this recent trend by public agencies to try and do this creates an untenable and unjustifiable burden on contractors. AB 552 seeks to remedy this issue. The author's office states that to address concerns about the potential invalidation of clauses that, though not directly involving consequential damages, may nonetheless be interpreted as falling within this bill's liquidation requirements, this bill limits the scope of consequential damages covered to only "delay damages," as defined. Additionally, this bill's scope is limited to cover only those public works contracts that contain a clause expressly requiring a contractor to be responsible for delay damages. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No SUPPORT: (Verified 8/18/15) Construction Employers' Association (source) Air Conditioning Sheet Metal Association Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration Contractors Association Associated Builders and Contractors of California Associated General Contractors California Association of Sheet Metal & Air Conditioning Contractors' National Association California Chapters of the National Electrical Contractors Association California Concrete Contractors Association California Legislative Conference of the Plumbing, Heating and AB 552 Page 5 Piping Industry California Surety Federation Finishing Contractors Association of Southern California United Contractors Wall and Ceiling Alliance OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/18/15) California Special Districts Association City of La Quinta City of Sacramento ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Proponents reference the fact that some public agencies have adopted policies requiring both liquidated damages and unlimited consequential damages as penalties for project delays in their public works contracts. Specifically, the City and County of San Francisco, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, the San Francisco Metropolitan Transportation Agency, and the Los Angeles World Airports, among others, have attempted to create contracts that include undefined consequential damages for project delay as a term contractors must accept. While some of these entities have reversed their decision on pursuing these provisions due to difficulty finding contractors willing to agree, others have not. The Construction Employers' Association states that, "Consequential damages are not a standard form of damages for construction contracts because they are difficult to define, quantify or ascertain. They are also uninsurable, and as a matter of practice, they are only recoverable in tort actions. Instead, contacts have historically addressed consequential damages for delay using a stipulated liquidated damages amount. In fact, the American Institute of Architects has utilized this approach in their standard contract forms for approximately 25 years. Liquidated damages are intended to be a reasonable advance approximation of an owner's projected damages for delay such as indirect fees and costs, rental charges, and utility costs. Liquidated damages therefore give all parties notice and opportunity to evaluate the risk of delay, whereas one cannot evaluate or price risk under an open-ended consequential damages clause." ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: The Cities of La Quinta and AB 552 Page 6 Sacramento, writing in opposition, state, "By requiring that all consequential damages be liquidated, AB 552 limits the ability of public agencies to ensure that the costs associated with a contractor's non-performance or under-performance could be collected. The priority for cities is to have a project completed on time, not to collect damages. However, when a contractor does not perform as required under their contract, damages provide restitution for the taxpayers and agency." The California Special Districts Association, also in opposition, states, "This bill threatens to void many commonly used contract terms which state specific recoverable damages that could be classified as consequential damages. Public works contracts contain many items which pertain to damages for breach. Because it can be difficult to determine whether a particular breach has caused consequential damages, AB 552 could lead to uncertainty as to which contract items should include a liquidated damages amount in order to prevent the provisions being voided." ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 5/11/15 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood NO VOTE RECORDED: Atkins Prepared by:Arthur Terzakis / G.O. / (916) 651-1530 8/20/15 16:31:15 **** END **** AB 552 Page 7