BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 557


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:   May 6, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          557 (Irwin) - As Introduced February 23, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Banking and Finance            |Vote:|11 - 0       |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |Revenue and Taxation           |Vote:|9 - 0        |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  YesReimbursable:   
          No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill establishes an administrative dissolution process and  
          an administrative surrender process for nonprofit corporations.   
          In summary, this bill:











                                                                     AB 557


                                                                    Page  2







          1)Creates a mechanism for dissolving or surrendering nonprofit  
            corporations that have had their corporate powers suspended or  
            forfeited by the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) or have failed to  
            file a statement of information (SOI) with the Secretary of  
            State (SOS), in each case for a period of not less than 48  
            continuous months.





          2)Establishes procedures for notice of pending dissolution or  
            surrender to nonprofit corporations and allows those nonprofit  
            corporations an opportunity to provide written objections to  
            dissolution or surrender.





          3)Allows a nonprofit corporation that has objected to  
            dissolution or surrender a period of 90 days to satisfy any  
            and all outstanding debts and file a current SOI with the SOS,  
            before FTB or SOS may proceed with the dissolution or  
            surrender of the entity.  The FTB and SOS are given  
            flexibility to extend this 90 day period for an additional 90  
            days.





          4)Creates a mechanism for voluntary dissolution of a nonprofit  
            corporation upon certification of certain matters by the  
            entity.










                                                                     AB 557


                                                                    Page  3








          5)Specifies that any liability to creditors of the nonprofit  
            corporation is not discharged as a result of dissolution or  
            surrender, and clarifies that dissolution or surrender does  
            not diminish or adversely affect the ability of the Attorney  
            General to enforce liabilities.





          6)Requires the FTB to abate, upon written request by nonprofit  
            corporations that had their tax-exempt status revoked or never  
            conducted business in California at any time following its  
            incorporation, unpaid California taxes, interest, and  
            penalties for the taxable years the nonprofit corporation  
            certifies under penalty of perjury that it was not doing  
            business, provided the nonprofit corporation must dissolve  
            within 12 months of requesting abatement.





          7)Allows the FTB to disclose contact information for nonprofit  
            corporations to the SOS for purposes of providing notice to  
            the corporations.





          8)Allows the FTB to prescribe rules and regulations as  
          necessary.


          








                                                                     AB 557


                                                                    Page  4







          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)One-time GF costs of approximately $600,000 to SOS to update  
            systems and implement new processes; minor and absorbable  
            costs to FTB; potential long-term savings from no longer  
            having to track and issue notices to defunct nonprofit  
            businesses.





          2)No impact to state income tax revenues.


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose.  The goal of AB 557 is to streamline the dissolution  
            process for nonprofit corporations.  According to the author,  
            the new process allows FTB and SOS to dissolve nonprofits that  
            have been inactive for quite some time.  Many of these  
            nonprofit corporations have been disbanded years earlier by  
            their boards of directors but never took the proper steps to  
            dissolve, thus causing years of fees and fines to build up and  
            unnecessary time spent by FTB and SOS staff to proceed through  
            the dissolutions process.  AB 557 will help FTB and SOS  
            administratively clear the backlog of inactive nonprofit  
            corporations.





            According to the findings and declarations in the bill, every  
            year, hundreds of nonprofit corporations seek administrative  








                                                                     AB 557


                                                                    Page  5





            changes to expand their mission or alter their tax status,  
            and, in some cases, to even go out of existence.  The current  
            dissolution process, which involves the winding down of the  
            nonprofit corporation's affairs, is very cumbersome and  
            protracted.





            Not only is it in the public's interest to establish a  
            streamlined process to efficiently dissolve a nonprofit  
            corporation, but doing so will relieve the citizens of  
            California from unknowingly donating to a nonprofit  
            corporation that is not complying with the laws of the state.





          2)Background.  According to the findings and declarations in the  
            bill, there are more than 150,000 nonprofit corporations in  
            California that provide a variety of programs and services in  
            areas as diverse as education, recreation, health care, legal,  
            job training, and housing to millions of Californians.  These  
            organizations, depending on their formation status, are  
            required to register with the office of the SOS, the FTB, and  
            the office of the Attorney General.





          3)Prior Legislation.  This bill is substantially similar to AB  
            1529 (J. Perez) of 2014, which was vetoed by the Governor.  In  
            his veto message, the Governor stressed implementing the bill  
            would require "expensive reprogramming of an obsolescent  
            computer system that will soon be replaced," and that it was  
            preferable to wait for that system replacement before  








                                                                     AB 557


                                                                    Page  6





            proceeding with the bill.





            While the policy aims of this bill are laudable, and would  
            eventually improve the efficiency of state government, there  
            is currently no indication that the Governor's concerns have  
            been addressed or that he will support AB 557.








          Analysis Prepared by:Joel Tashjian / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081