BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 577 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 577 (Bonilla) As Amended May 28, 2015 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes |Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------| |Natural |9-0 |Williams, Dahle, | | |Resources | | | | | | | | | | | |Cristina Garcia, | | | | |Hadley, Harper, | | | | |McCarty, Rendon, | | | | |Mark Stone, Wood | | | | | | | |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------| |Appropriations |17-0 |Gomez, Bigelow, | | | | |Bonta, Calderon, | | | | |Chang, Daly, Eggman, | | | | |Gallagher, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Eduardo Garcia, | | | | |Gordon, Holden, | | | | |Jones, Quirk, | | | | |Rendon, Wagner, | | | | |Weber, Wood | | | | | | | AB 577 Page 2 | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Establishes the Biomethane Collection and Purification Grant Program (Program). Specifically, this bill: 1)Establishes the Program and requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to develop and implement grants for projects that build or develop collection and purification technology, infrastructure, and projects that upgrade existing biomethane facilities to meet the state's biomethane standards. 2)When awarding grants, requires CEC to consider: a) Opportunities to collocate biomethane producers with vehicle fleets to generate biomethane and convert it to transportation fuel at the same location; and, b) Location of biomethane sources and their proximity to natural gas pipeline injection sites. 3)Requires CEC to prioritize projects that provide the maximum greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions for each dollar awarded. 4)Specifies that grants may be funded from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) upon appropriation by the Legislature. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, this bill has AB 577 Page 3 1)Unknown cost pressures to the GGRF to fund the Program. 2)Unknown increased administrative costs for CEC to develop and implement the Program. COMMENTS: The anaerobic digestion of biodegradable organic matter produces biogas, which consists of methane, carbon dioxide, and other trace amounts of gases. Depending on where it is produced, biogas can be categorized as landfill gas or digester gas. Landfill gas is produced by decomposition of organic waste in a municipal solid waste landfill. Digester gas is typically produced from livestock manure, sewage treatment or food waste. According to a CEC estimate, 358 megawatts (MW) is potentially available from new landfill gas development. Of these landfills, some are small and are therefore unlikely to be developed for gas by 2020. Biogas can also be used in place of gasoline or diesel for transportation. According to a November 2014 report by the Bioenergy Association of California, California could generate as much as 10% of its total gas consumption (2,415 gasoline gallon equivalents) from organic waste, or the equivalent of 7,000 MW of renewable power. Biogas has significant GHG emissions reduction potential; a recent report by the International Panel on Climate Change states that methane has 34 times the heat-trapping effects of carbon dioxide over a 100-year period. Biogas produced from the anaerobic digestion of organic waste (i.e., food and green waste) has a negative carbon intensity (-15), wastewater treatment biogas has a carbon intensity of 7.89, dairy digester biogas has a carbon intensity of 13.45, and landfill biogas has a carbon intensity between 11.26 and 15.56. For comparison, the carbon intensity of gasoline is 99.18, and diesel is 98.3. Other environmental benefits of biogas include locally sourced renewable energy, improved air and water quality and other ecosystem benefits, waste reduction, as well as reducing California's dependence on fossil fuels and vulnerability to wildfire (for forestry biomass). AB 577 Page 4 Current bioenergy production in California includes 33 biomass plants that generate a combined 600 MW of electricity (nearly 2% of California's total electricity supply); 11 dairy digesters that produce electricity, combined heat and power, and biogas; 500 MW of electricity is generated at biogas facilities at wastewater treatment plants and landfills; and, 50 million to 100 million gasoline gallon equivalent produced at in-state ethanol and biodiesel facilities. The CEC's Bioenergy Action Plan states: Despite its many benefits, bioenergy production uses only 15% of California's available biomass waste, and production is decreasing. Regulatory and financial incentives for renewable power do not adequately monetize the many benefits of bioenergy, and regulatory barriers compound these challenges. Some incentives for bioenergy have been inconsistent or discontinued while others have failed to account for the additional costs and benefits of biomass. Environmental, waste disposal, public health, and pipeline safety regulations often complicate bioenergy permitting and development and sometimes contradict each other. Access to transmission lines, pipelines and other distribution networks also pose significant challenges to bioenergy development. Some of these challenges require additional research and demonstration to ensure that bioenergy production is environmentally and economically sustainable. Other barriers require regulatory changes, including permit streamlining and consolidation, utility procurement requirements, financial incentives that reflect the many benefits of bioenergy, and other changes. The Plan identifies several recommended actions, including AB 577 Page 5 "facilitate access to transmission, pipelines, and other distribution networks." This bill would provide funding that could be used to achieve this recommended action. Analysis Prepared by: Elizabeth MacMillan / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092 FN: 0000824