BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 626 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 626 (Chiu and Low) As Amended August 19, 2016 Majority vote -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: | |(June 3, 2015) |SENATE: |39-0 |(August 23, | | | | | | |2016) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- (vote not relevant) Original Committee Reference: HIGHER ED. SUMMARY: Establishes, with specified exceptions, a claim resolution process for public works projects with local and state public entities. The Senate amendments delete the Assembly version of this bill, and instead: 1)State that it is in the interest of the state to ensure that a payment is made in a timely manner for the undisputed construction costs of a public works projects. 2)Define a claim as a demand sent by a contractor to a public AB 626 Page 2 entity that includes, among others, a payment of an amount that is disputed by the public entity. 3)Require a public entity to review and respond in writing to a claim within 45 days, and identify the portions that are disputed and undisputed. 4)Require public entities to pay undisputed amounts within 60 days of the written response. 5)Allow the contractor to demand an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of disputed issues if the contractor disputes the written response or the public entity fails to respond. 6)Require the public entity to respond within 10 business days after the meet and confer conference with a written statement specifying disputed and undisputed items. 7)Require the undisputed amounts that are agreed to after the conference to be paid within 60 days. 8)Require the remaining disputed portions of a claim to be submitted to nonbinding mediation, and the contractor and public entity to share mediation costs equally. 9)Allow other specified processes if mediation is not successful. 10)Set a 7% annual interest rate for amounts not paid in a timely manner. 11)Allow a subcontractor to use the claim resolution process by AB 626 Page 3 working through the contractor. 12)Exclude several specified state public entities from requirements of this bill. 13)Sunset requirements of this bill on January 1, 2020. EXISTING LAW specifies: 1)That state public works contract disputes are generally subject to arbitration. 2)That local entity public works contract disputes proscribe a resolution process for contracts of $375,000 or less. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: 1)State agencies: Potential costs (General Fund) to state agencies not specifically exempted from the bill's provisions, including the University of California and the California State University, that engage in public works contracts for claims review and resolution, which will result in additional administrative costs to review, evaluate, and respond to claims within 45 days, and for mandated mediation. State agencies are currently not subject to any statutory timelines for claims review and resolution, and unresolved claims are subject to arbitration. Staff notes the state agencies with numerous public works contracts and/or large-scale projects (i.e., Department of Transportation (CalTrans), Department of Water Resources (DWR), Department of General Services (DGS), High Speed Rail Authority) have been exempted from the bill's provisions. AB 626 Page 4 2)Local agencies: Potentially major state-reimbursable costs in the millions of dollars (General Fund) to local agencies engaged in public works projects to the extent this new process results in higher administrative costs, including any increase in administrative costs incurred under the existing process for resolution of claims under $375,000. 3)Interest: Additional costs to state and local agencies for additional interest costs accrued on late payments under the timelines prescribed in this bill. COMMENTS: This bill establishes a claim resolution process for public works projects for state and local public entities. It specifies that contractors can submit claims to public entities. According to the author, the intent of this bill is to ensure that undisputed portions of claims are paid in a timely manner and that there is a mechanism in place to resolve disputed items. The author explains that long-standing disputes have placed some contractors in difficult financial circumstances. This bill requires public entities to provide a written response to claims within 45 days that details disputed and undisputed amounts. Further, it requires the payment of undisputed amounts and sets a process to resolve remaining disputes. Contractors can demand a meet and confer conference with the entity for remaining disputes. Items not resolved during the conference are submitted to nonbinding mediation. The following state entities are excluded from the requirements in this bill: 1)DWR, as to any project under its jurisdiction. 2)CalTrans, as to any project under its jurisdiction. AB 626 Page 5 3)The Department of Parks and Recreation, as to any project under its jurisdiction. 4)The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, with respect to any project under its jurisdiction, as specified. 5)The Military Department, as to any project under its jurisdiction. 6)DGS, as to all other projects. 7)The High-Speed Rail Authority. The requirements of this bill sunset on January 1, 2020. This bill is substantially similar to the author's AB 1347 in 2015, which was vetoed by Governor Brown. According to the author, this bill is the result of various stakeholder meetings to resolve earlier-identified issues while AB 1347 was under consideration. Analysis Prepared by: Scott Herbstman / A. & A.R. / (916) 319-3600 FN: 0004885