BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 631


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 8, 2015


                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION


                              Patrick O'Donnell, Chair


          AB 631  
          (Bonilla) - As Introduced February 24, 2015


          SUBJECT:  School finance:  Common Core and Next Generation  
          Science Standards Implementation Fund Act


          SUMMARY:  Establishes the Common Core and Next Generation  
          Science Standards Implementation Fund, to provide $1 billion in  
          funding for the implementation of those standards and the  
          English Language Development standards, upon appropriation by  
          the Legislature.   Specifically, this bill:  


          1)Establishes the Common Core and Next Generation Science  
            Standards Implementation Fund for the purpose of implementing  
            the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), the Next Generation  
            Science Standards (NGSS), and the English Language Development  
            (ELD) standards.


          2)Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) to  
            allocate funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) - defined  
            as school districts, county offices of education, charter  
            schools, and state special schools - on the basis of an equal  
            amount per student based on prior year enrollment.  


          3)Allows the funding to be available for encumbrance through the  








                                                                     AB 631


                                                                    Page  2





            2016-17 fiscal year.


          4)Requires that LEAs spend this funding for any of these  
            purposes:


             a)   Professional development for teachers, administrators,  
               and paraprofessionals


             b)   Integration of the CCSS, NGSS, and ELD standards through  
               technology-based instruction


             c)   Instructional materials aligned to the above standards


          1)Requires that, as a condition of receiving funding, the  
            governing body of the LEA:


             a)   Develop a spending plan, adopted by the governing board


             b)   Report expenditure information to the California  
               Department of Education (CDE), including purchases made and  
               the number of personnel trained


          1)Requires that the CDE report this information to the  
            appropriate fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature.


          2)Provides that the article will not be implemented unless  
            funding is provided for that purpose in the annual budget act  
            or other statute.










                                                                     AB 631


                                                                    Page  3





          3)Requires that $1 billion be allocated to LEAs for the purpose  
            of the Implementation Fund.


          


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Through 2013-14 budget related legislation (AB 86, Chapter 48,  
            Statutes of 2013), establishes a Common Core Implementation  
            Block Grant to support the implementation of CCSS, NGSS, and  
            the ELD standards, and appropriates $1.25 billion in one-time  
            funding for that purpose.


          2)Requires the State Board of Education (SBE) to adopt or reject  
            content standards in English language arts and mathematics and  
            requires that at least 85% of those standards to be those  
            developed by the Common Core State Standards Initiative  
            consortium.


          3)Requires the SPI to convene a group of science experts to  
            recommend science content standards for adoption to the SBE,  
            utilizing the Next Generation Science Standards as the basis  
            for their deliberations and recommendations.  Requires the SBE  
            to adopt, reject, or modify the standards.  This section is  
            now repealed.


          4)Requires the SPI, in consultation with the SBE, to update,  
            revise, and align the English language development standards  
            to the Common Core State Standards, and requires the SBE to  
            adopt or reject those revised standards.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown








                                                                     AB 631


                                                                    Page  4







          COMMENTS:  


          Need for the bill.  The author's office states:  "California is  
          in the process of overhauling its curriculum standards for  
          English language Arts, Mathematics, and Science. Shifts to the  
          Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Science Standards,  
          and English Language Development Standards will equip students  
          with the skills and knowledge needed for college and career  
          success. The new content standards and their accompanying  
          computer-based assessments require districts to properly train  
          teachers, update instructional materials, and increase the  
          integration of technology. 





          Based on the cost of implementing previous content standards,  
          the Department of Education estimated that Common Core would  
          cost $3 billion to successfully implement. However, since the  
          standards were adopted, only $1.25 billion has been dedicated to  
          the implementation of Common Core. The Common Core  
          Implementation Block Grant of 2013-14 was a critical first  
          investment but districts continue to have great need as they  
          shift to the new content standards."





          Prior Common Core Implementation Block Grant and mandates  
          backlog funding.  The 2013-14 budget appropriated $1.25 billion  
          for a Common Core Implementation Block Grant to support the  
          implementation of the CCSS, the NGSS, and the ELD standards. 










                                                                     AB 631


                                                                    Page  5





          The 2014-15 budget appropriated $400 million in partial payment  
          of the backlog of K-12 education mandate claims, and expressed  
          Legislative intent that the funding be used for the  
          implementation of the above standards.


          Governor's Budget proposal for 2015-16.  The 2015-16 Governor's  
          Budget proposes a one-time payment of $1.1 billion toward the  
          mandates backlog and suggests that LEAs use the funds for the  
          implementation of the above standards. According to the  
          Legislative Analyst's Office, as of October, 2014, there was an  
          estimated backlog of $4.8 billion in unpaid mandate claims.  





          This bill proposes that the issues of standards implementation  
          and the mandate backlog be addressed through separate  
          appropriations. The author's office indicates that the funding  
          source for this bill is anticipated one-time Proposition 98  
          revenues in excess of those budgeted in the Governor's Budget.   
          The Legislative Analyst's Office has projected that a higher  
          level of one-time revenue will be available for appropriation in  
          this year's budget process. 





          NGSS-aligned Science Framework delayed.  The CDE reports that  
          the revision of the science framework (which reflects the NGSS)  
          has encountered delays and will not be completed by the planned  
          date of January 31, 2016.  They report a revised completion date  
          of January 31, 2017.  This in turn will delay the adoption of  
          instructional materials aligned to the new standards. 


          How did districts spend the 2013 Common Core Implementation  








                                                                     AB 631


                                                                    Page  6





          Block Grant funds?  The Association of California School  
          Administrators recently conducted a survey on the expenditure of  
          the 2013 Common Core Implementation Block Grant funds by school  
          districts.  The survey found a fairly even distribution of  
          expenditures in the three allowable categories (professional  
          development, instructional materials, and technology), with  
          slightly more interest in professional development activities.   
          When asked about how any new funding would be spent, district  
          priorities were again fairly evenly distributed among the three  
          categories.  When asked how new money devoted to technology in  
          support of new assessments would be spent, the four priorities  
          of hardware, connectivity, professional development, and  
          classroom space/facilities were also equally prioritized, with  
          the exception of classroom space, in which was rated a lower  
          priority.  


          Related legislation.  AB 2319 (Bonilla) of the 2013-14 Session  
          would have established the Innovation, Training, and Common Core  
          Implementation Fund to provide funding for professional  
          development aligned to new academic content standards, education  
          technology, and instructional materials aligned to new content  
          standards. The bill was held in the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee.


          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:




          Support


          Association of California School Administrators (sponsor)


          Antioch Unified School District









                                                                     AB 631


                                                                    Page  7






          Association of American Publishers, Inc.


          Brentwood Union School District


          California Federation of Teachers


          California Science Teachers Association


          California STEM Learning Network


          Children Now


          Coalition for Adequate School Housing


          Contra Costa County Office of Education


          Corona-Norco Unified School District


          Education Trust-West


          Mt. Diablo Unified School District


          Pleasanton Unified School District


          Riverside County Superintendent of Schools









                                                                     AB 631


                                                                    Page  8






          TechAmerica


          TechNet




          Opposition


          None on file




          Analysis Prepared by:Tanya Lieberman / ED. / (916) 319-2087