AB 641,
as amended, begin deleteDahleend delete begin insertMayesend insert. Environmental quality:begin delete environmental impact reports. end deletebegin insert housing developments.end insert
The California Environmental Quality Act requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. The act also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. The act establishes a procedure by which a person may seek judicial review of the decision of the lead agency made pursuant to the act.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before July 1, 2016, to adopt a rule of court to establish procedures applicable to actions or proceedings seeking judicial review of a public agency’s action in certifying the environmental impact report and in granting approval for housing developments, as defined. The procedures would require the actions or proceedings, including any appeals therefrom, to be resolved, to the extent feasible, within 270 days of the certification of the record of proceedings. The bill would prohibit a court from staying or enjoining those housing developments unless it makes specified findings.
end insertThe California Environmental Quality Act requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. The act also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. The act requires the lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment based on substantial evidence in light of the whole record.
end deleteThis bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision.
end deleteVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 21172 is added to the end insertbegin insertPublic Resources
2Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
(a) For the purposes of this section “housing
4development” means any activity related to the new construction
5of houses or dwelling units for the primary purpose of providing
6decent, safe, and sanitary housing for persons and families of all
7income levels. A housing development includes, but is not limited
8to, any building, land, equipment, facilities, or other real or
9personal property that a local agency determines to be necessary
10or convenient in connection with the provision of housing,
11including, but not limited to, streets, sewers, utilities, parks, site
12preparation, landscaping, and other nonhousing facilities, such
13as administrative, community, health, recreational, educational,
P3 1commercial facilities, and that the local agency determines are an
2integral part of a housing development.
3(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the procedures established
4pursuant to subdivision (c) shall apply to an action or proceeding
5brought to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the certification
6of the environmental impact report for a housing development or
7the granting of any approvals for a housing development.
8(c) On or before July 1, 2016, the Judicial Council shall adopt
9a rule of court to establish procedures applicable to actions or
10proceedings brought to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul
11the certification of the environmental impact report for a housing
12development or the granting of any project approvals. These
13procedures shall require the actions or proceedings, including
14any potential appeals therefrom, to be resolved, to the extent
15feasible, within 270 days of certification of the record of
16
proceedings.
17(d) (1) In granting relief in an action or proceeding brought
18pursuant to this division, the court shall not stay or enjoin the
19construction or operation of a housing development unless the
20court finds either of the following:
21(A) The continued construction or operation of the housing
22development presents an imminent threat to the public health and
23safety.
24(B) The site of the housing development contains unforeseen
25important Native American artifacts or unforeseen important
26historical, archaeological, or ecological values that would be
27materially, permanently, and adversely affected by
the continued
28construction or operation of the housing development unless the
29court stays or enjoins the construction or operation of the housing
30development.
31(2) If the court finds that subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph
32(1) is satisfied, the court shall only enjoin those specific activities
33associated with the housing development that present an imminent
34threat to public health and safety or that materially, permanently,
35and adversely affect unforeseen important Native American
36artifacts or unforeseen important historical, archaeological, or
37ecological values.
Section 21082.2 of the Public Resources Code
39 is amended to read:
(a) The lead agency shall determine whether a project
2may have a significant effect on the environment based on
3substantial evidence in light of the whole record.
4(b) The existence of public controversy over the environmental
5effects of a project shall not require preparation of an
6environmental impact report if there is no substantial evidence in
7light of the whole record before the lead agency that the project
8may have a significant effect on the environment.
9(c) Argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative,
10evidence
that is clearly inaccurate or erroneous, or evidence of
11social or economic impacts that do not contribute to, or are not
12caused by, physical impacts on the environment, is not substantial
13evidence. Substantial evidence shall include facts, reasonable
14assumptions predicated upon facts, and expert opinion supported
15by facts.
16(d) If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record
17before the lead agency, that a project may have a significant effect
18on the environment, an environmental impact report shall be
19prepared.
20(e) Statements in an environmental impact report and comments
21with respect to an environmental impact report shall not be
deemed
22determinative of whether the project may have a significant effect
23on the environment.
O
98