BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING Senator Jim Beall, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: AB 643 Hearing Date: 6/23/2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Nazarian | |----------+------------------------------------------------------| |Version: |4/8/2015 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Eric Thronson | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Emergency services: Silver Alerts DIGEST: This bill allows the California Highway Patrol (CHP), upon activation of a Silver Alert, to communicate the Alert on highway changeable message signs under certain conditions. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Authorizes use of the Emergency Alert System (EAS), a national public warning system that requires broadcasters, cable television systems, wireless cable systems, satellite digital audio radio service providers, and direct broadcast satellite providers, for "AMBER Alerts," a program designed to aid in the recovery of an abducted child or an individual with a proven mental or physical disability when all of the following conditions have been met: a) A law enforcement agency determines that the victim is in imminent danger of serious bodily injury or death; and b) There is information available that, if disseminated to the general public, could assist in the safe recovery of the victim. AB 643 (Nazarian) Page 2 of ? 1)Requires the CHP, in consultation with others, to develop policies and procedures to instruct agencies how to carry out an AMBER Alert. 2)Authorizes use of the EAS for "Blue Alerts," a quick-response system designed to issue and coordinate alerts when a law enforcement officer has been killed or is seriously injured and when all the following conditions have been met: a) The suspect has fled the scene and poses an imminent threat to public safety; b) A detailed description of the suspect's vehicle or license plate is available for broadcasting; and c) There is information available that, if disseminated to the general public, could help avert further harm or accelerate apprehension of the suspect. 1)Establishes a "Silver Alert" notification system, designed to issue and coordinate alerts if a person that is age 65 years or older, developmentally disabled, or cognitively impaired is missing and if the following conditions have been met: a) A law enforcement agency has used all available local resources to locate the missing person; b) The missing person is believed to be in danger because AB 643 (Nazarian) Page 3 of ? of, for example, health or weather conditions; and c) It has been determined that the public dissemination of information may lead to a safe recovery of the missing person. 1)Directs CHP, upon activation of a Silver Alert, to issue a be-on-the-lookout alert, an Emergency Digital Information Service message, or an electronic flyer. As opposed to AMBER and Blue alerts, existing law does not authorize use of the EAS or changeable message signs for Silver Alerts. This bill: 1)Allows CHP, upon activation of a Silver Alert, to communicate the Alert on highway changeable message signs if the following conditions are met: a) A law enforcement agency determines that a vehicle may be involved in the missing person incident; and b) Specific vehicle identification is available for public dissemination. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. The author has introduced this measure to improve the effectiveness of the Silver Alert program. He notes that Californians drive over 300 billion miles annually and, consequently, have frequent exposure to changeable message signs, primarily along the state's freeway corridors. In authorizing the use of these changeable message signs to disseminate information regarding Silver Alerts, the author hopes this exposure will lead to the safe return of missing persons. 2)Emergency alert system background. The nation's first AMBER Alert was established in 1996, and named after 9-year-old Amber Hagerman, who was kidnapped while riding her bicycle and brutally murdered in Arlington, Texas. The alert system was AB 643 (Nazarian) Page 4 of ? intended to help inform local residents to search for a child who was abducted nearby. AMBER is an acronym for America's Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response. The alerts were initially issued over broadcasting channels designed to alert residents of dangerous weather events, but since then they have grown to include highway billboard signs, text messages, and other notification methods. Although the federal government does not have direct control over the system, several federal agencies have urged states to implement it. The U.S. Department of Justice created an AMBER Alert page, and issued guidance to states to establish criteria before issuing an alert, including that the victim be at risk of serious bodily injury or death, a sufficient description to be informative is included, and that law enforcement must confirm there was an abduction, among others. California began the AMBER Alert as a regional program in 1999 and in 2002 the Legislature passed AB 415 (Runner, Chapter 517), establishing it statewide. As of February 2014, there have been 219 activations in California, 255 recovered victims and 131 suspects arrested. The CHP is responsible for statewide coordination of the AMBER Alert system. In 2010, SB 839 (Runner, Chapter 311) expanded the alert system to include "Blue Alerts" which allow the CHP to initiate a quick response to coordinate alerts following an attack on a law enforcement officer if the officer was killed, suffered serious bodily injury, or was assaulted with a deadly weapon, and the suspect remains at large. Finally, in 2012 the Legislature established the Silver Alert program through SB 1047 (Alquist, Chapter 651) to coordinate communication after the unexplained or suspicious disappearance of an elderly person. The system is intended to provide immediate attention to the public about the missing person, including photographs, descriptions and information about the last time and location they were seen. The Legislature has since expanded the program to include any developmentally disabled or cognitively impaired individual that otherwise meets the requirements, regardless of the person's age. 3)Distracted driving concerns. A variety of constituencies have conducted distracted driving studies focused on a number of AB 643 (Nazarian) Page 5 of ? potential distractions. There are studies that use data to prove illuminated billboards do not lead to negative outcomes, and other studies that refute these conclusions. Nearly all studies admit that, in most instances, it is very difficult to identify one single factor that led to an adverse incident such as an automobile accident. Research tends to show that accidents arise from an accumulation of factors, including distractions in the vehicle and outside, weather conditions, and even distracting thoughts within the driver's mind. It is clear, however, that billboards by their very nature capture a driver's attention. Advertising is intended to communicate a message to the recipient, which requires some attention. One recent study of driver behavior conducted by the Accident Research Center at Monash University concluded that, "the presence of billboards changed drivers' pattern of visual attention, increased the amount of time needed for drivers to respond to road signs, and increased the number of errors in the driving task." Other studies using naturalistic driving data have found that, of all the various distractions contributing to poor driving outcomes, visual distraction is the primary concern in driver distraction. This bill proposes that the state use its digital billboards to advertise to the public an alert. While illuminated billboards may not by themselves lead to adverse safety impacts, it is clear that they contribute to the multiple distractions drivers navigate each day. Adding distractions, especially ones that are particularly effective at drawing one's attention, can only increase the risk of negative outcomes. The question is not whether these alerts on the state's changeable message signs cause accidents and other negative consequences, but how many distractions are enough to create an environment potentially too risky and dangerous for people traveling from one place to another. 4)Diluting the message? In 2014 the Legislature passed AB 47 (Gatto), which proposed to create a "Yellow Alert" system for hit-and-run accidents. Though AB 47 passed with bipartisan support, it was vetoed by the Governor. In his veto message, Governor Brown noted that since the Legislature had just added a new class of individuals to the existing alert system with SB 1127 (Torres, Chapter 440, Statutes of 2014), adding yet another category (hit-and-run suspects) could overload the alert system, thereby diluting its effectiveness. Further, in AB 643 (Nazarian) Page 6 of ? a letter opposing AB 8 (Gatto), a bill identical to AB 47 of 2014, CHP raises this concern again this year. The committee should consider carefully the warning CHP is giving about desensitizing the public to the important alerts on the state's changeable message signs by overloading the alert system. As the CHP points out, the success of AMBER Alerts is partially a result of their scarcity. By adding another type of alert to the changeable message signs, is the Legislature reducing the effectiveness of existing alerts? Related Legislation: AB 8 (Gatto) - authorizes CHP to assist other law enforcement agencies in investigating certain hit-and-run incidents by issuing a "Yellow Alert" via a local digital sign. This bill is also being heard in this committee today. AB 400 (Alejo) - authorizes the use of changeable message signs for voter registration and Election Day reminders. This bill is also being heard in this committee today. AB 47 (Gatto, Statutes of 2014) - was identical to this session's AB 8, and was vetoed by Governor Brown. The Governor pointed out in his veto message that expansion of the system should be tested before other categories of individuals are added. SB 1127 (Torres, Chapter 440, Statutes of 2014) - included a missing person who is developmentally disabled or cognitively impaired among persons who may be the subject of a Silver Alert. SB 1047 (Alquist, Chapter 651, Statutes of 2012) - established California's Silver Alert System. SB 839 (Runner, Chapter 311, Statutes of 2010) - established California's Blue Alert System. Assembly Votes: Floor: 76-0 Appr: 17-0 Aging<C: 7-0 Trans: 15-0 AB 643 (Nazarian) Page 7 of ? FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday, June 17, 2015.) SUPPORT: Alzheimer's Association American Silver Alert Coalition Association of Regional Center Agencies California Assisted Living Association California College and University Police Chiefs Association California Police Chiefs Association California Senior Legislature Center for Autism and Related Disorders Congress of California Seniors County of Marin County of San Diego North Los Angeles County Regional Center State Council on Developmental Disabilities The Arc and United Cerebral Palsy California Collaboration The Help Group OPPOSITION: None received -- END --