BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 645 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 27, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES Das Williams, Chair AB 645 (Williams) - As Introduced February 24, 2015 SUBJECT: Electricity: California Renewables Portfolio Standard SUMMARY: Establishes a Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) target of 50% by 2030, including interim targets of 38% by 2023 and 44% by 2026. EXISTING LAW: 1)The RPS requires "retail sellers" of electricity [i.e., investor-owned utilities (IOUs), energy service providers (ESPs) and community choice aggregators (CCAs)], as well as publicly owned utilities (POUs), to procure eligible renewable energy resources to meet the following portfolio targets: a) 20 percent on average from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013. b) 25 percent by December 31, 2016. c) 33 percent by December 31, 2020 and each year thereafter. 2)Authorizes the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) require AB 645 Page 2 retail sellers to procure eligible renewable energy resources in excess of these targets. 3)Provides that eligible renewable generation facilities must use biomass, solar thermal, photovoltaic, wind, geothermal, renewable fuel cells, small hydroelectric, digester gas, limited non-combustion municipal solid waste conversion, landfill gas, ocean wave, ocean thermal or tidal current. THIS BILL establishes a RPS target of 50% by December 31, 2030 for retail sellers and POUs, including interim targets of 38% by the end of the 2021-2023 compliance period, 44% by the end of the 2024-2026 compliance period, and 50% by the end of the 2027-2030 compliance period. FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown COMMENTS: 1)Background. The RPS is the centerpiece of California's effort to develop a clean energy system and reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions associated with electricity consumption. The original RPS bill, SB 1078 (Sher), Chapter 516, Statutes of 2002, set a goal of 20 percent by 2017. SB 107 (Simitian), Chapter 464, Statutes of 2006, accelerated the deadline for 20 percent to 2010. SBX1 2 (Simitian), Chapter 1, Statutes of 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session, codified the current 33 percent by 2020 RPS target and also established product content categories (or "buckets"), which place the highest value (Bucket 1) on renewable energy that is directly delivered into California because it has the greatest economic, environmental and reliability benefits. Since the RPS was enacted, IOUs have advanced beyond their 2002 average starting point of 12% renewables. According to the PUC's RPS reports, IOUs' actual RPS procurement in 2013 AB 645 Page 3 was 23.8% for Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), 21.6% for Southern California Edison (SCE), and 23.6% for San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E). The PUC reports also show that the IOUs are on track to meet the RPS requirement of 25% renewables by 2016 and are well-positioned to meet the 33% requirement by 2020. RPS procurement currently under contract for 2020 is 31.3% for PG&E, 23.5% for SCE, and 38.8% for SDG&E. 2)Governor's goals. In his January 5, 2015 Inaugural Address, Governor Brown announced the following "objectives for 2030 and beyond": Toward that end, I propose three ambitious goals to be accomplished within the next 15 years: Increase from one-third to 50 percent our electricity derived from renewable sources; Reduce today's petroleum use in cars and trucks by up to 50 percent; Double the efficiency of existing buildings and make heating fuels cleaner. We must also reduce the relentless release of methane, black carbon and other potent pollutants across industries. And we must manage farm and rangelands, forests and wetlands so they can store carbon. All of this is a very tall order. It means that we continue to transform our electrical grid, our transportation system and even our communities. AB 645 Page 4 I envision a wide range of initiatives: more distributed power, expanded rooftop solar, micro-grids, an energy imbalance market, battery storage, the full integration of information technology and electrical distribution and millions of electric and low-carbon vehicles. How we achieve these goals and at what pace will take great thought and imagination mixed with pragmatic caution. It will require enormous innovation, research and investment. And we will need active collaboration at every stage with our scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, businesses and officials at all levels. Taking significant amounts of carbon out of our economy without harming its vibrancy is exactly the sort of challenge at which California excels. This is exciting, it is bold and it is absolutely necessary if we are to have any chance of stopping potentially catastrophic changes to our climate system. 1)Author's statement: California is well on its way to meeting its near term climate change goals as the state currently uses renewable resources for about 25% of its electricity use and is on a trajectory to use 33% by 2020. However, in order to meet long term climate change goals, we must derive 50% of the state's electricity from renewable resources by 2030. Currently, most energy utilities have bought or built enough energy resources to meet the 33% RPS before the target year and without revising the state's existing RPS requirement, there isn't a driving force for utilities to procure beyond 33%. AB 645 Page 5 2)Issues to consider. Moving to 50% renewable energy presents a number of implementation issues which may need to be addressed by the Legislature to assure the policy is successful and not only meets its own objectives, but is consistent with other climate and energy policies. These include: a) Enabling the procurement and integration of the broad range of renewable resources necessary to assure balanced, reliable portfolios and maximize environmental benefits. b) Determining the manner in which electricity from small-scale and distributed renewable energy resources is counted toward the RPS to assure these resources are properly valued, but not double-counted. c) Reconciling the RPS with other programs that are part of the state's overall climate and energy goals, such as energy efficiency and electrification of the transportation sector. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support Advanced Energy Economy American Lung Association in California AB 645 Page 6 California Biomass Energy Alliance California Hydropower Reform Coalition California League of Conservation Voters California Wind Energy Association Energy Source Environment California Environmental Action Committee West Marin Environmental Defense Fund Independent Energy Producers Association Large-Scale Solar Association Natural Resources Defense Council Nextgen Climate Office of Ratepayer Advocates AB 645 Page 7 Sierra Club California Solar Energy Industries Association State Building and Construction Trades Council The Utility Reform Network Union of Concerned Scientists Vote Solar Opposition California Chamber of Commerce California Manufacturers & Technology Association Analysis Prepared by:Lawrence Lingbloom / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092 AB 645 Page 8