AB 650,
as amended, Low. begin deletePublic Utilities Commission: regulation of taxicabs. end deletebegin insertTaxicab transportation services.end insert
Existing law requires every city or county to adopt an ordinance or resolution in regard to taxicab transportation service and requires each city or county to provide for a policy for entry into the business of providing taxicab transportation service, establishment or registration of rates for the provision of taxicab transportation service, and a mandatory controlled substance and alcohol testing certification program for drivers, as specified.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would make those provisions inapplicable to a city or county, other than the City and County of San Francisco, on the date upon which the Director of Finance notifies the Speaker of the Assembly and the President pro Tempore of the Senate of the completion of a state reorganization of transportation duties from the Public Utilities Commission to other agencies, if taxicab transportation services are included in the reorganization. The bill would require taxicab transportation services and taxicab drivers to be subject to rules or regulations adopted by cities and counties as they existed on July 1, 2016, except for requirements specified in the bill that would apply to cities and counties, including charter cities and counties, other than the City and County of San Francisco. By imposing new duties on local governments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would declare that its provisions are a matter of statewide concern and not a municipal affair. The bill would declare the intent of the Legislature that, among other things, regulation of taxicab transportation services shall be modernized and moved to one state agency.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco.
end insertbegin insertThe California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
end insertExisting law provides for regulation of various types of passenger carriers by the Public Utilities Commission, including passenger stage corporations and charter-party carriers of passengers. Existing law, among other transportation services, provides for regulation of limousines and transportation network companies by the commission as charter-party carriers of passengers. Existing law requires every city and county to adopt an ordinance to regulate taxicab service within its jurisdiction, and exempts taxicab service from commission regulation.
end deleteThis bill would enact the Taxicab Transportation Services Act and provide, effective January 1, 2018, for the statewide regulation of taxicab transportation services by the commission, except taxicab transportation services originating in the City and County of San Francisco, which would continue to be locally regulated but would be subject to a requirement for taxicab carriers to monitor the driving records of taxicab drivers. The bill would provide for issuance of permits by the commission elsewhere in the state to taxicab carriers authorizing carriers to operate. The bill would specify the requirements that taxicab drivers in commission jurisdiction must meet. The bill would enact various provisions relating to insurance, vehicle inspections, monitoring of taxicab drivers, and other matters relating to taxicab carriers in commission jurisdiction. The bill would require the commission to require the disclosure of fares, fees and rates, as specified. The bill would prohibit entities from providing taxicab transportation services in commission jurisdiction without the required permit, and would provide for the commission to investigate and take action against unlicensed activity. The bill would require the commission to adopt a general order pertaining to taxicab carriers, and would authorize peace officers to enforce the provisions of the bill and the general order. The bill would specify certain fees to be imposed by the commission on taxicab carriers.
end deleteThe bill would repeal provisions providing for city and county regulation of taxicab services on January 1, 2018, but would authorize cities and counties, at their option, to elect to issue curbside operation permits to taxicab carriers under commission jurisdiction as of that date, granting exclusive authority to provide certain types of taxicab transportation services within their respective jurisdictions, including responding to street hails, sitting at taxi stands, and picking up at airports. The bill would authorize cities and counties issuing curbside operation permits to limit the number of taxicabs that may operate under that authority, would limit the local regulatory fees that those cities and counties may charge to $50 per taxicab, and would prohibit the imposition of taxicab carrier and taxicab driver fees, requirements, and standards beyond those required by the commission. The bill would also authorize airports to continue to regulate the provision of taxicab transportation services to and from airports. The bill would require cities and counties that license taxicab services as of December 31, 2017, excluding the City and County of San Francisco, to forward to the commission licensure information for each licensee, as specified, and would thereby impose a state-mandated local program. The bill also would make conforming changes to other related provisions.
end deleteA violation of the Taxicab Transportation Services Act would be a crime and in certain cases would also be subject to a civil penalty. The bill would also require applications for taxicab carrier permits to be verified under oath, and would require certain statements by taxicab carriers relative to workers’ compensation to be submitted to the commission under penalty of perjury. The bill would thereby impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes.
end deleteThe California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
end deleteThis bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
end deleteWith regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
end deleteVote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 53075.5 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is
2amended to read:end insert
(a) Notwithstanding Chapter 8 (commencing with
4Section 5351) of Division 2 of the Public Utilities Code, every
5city or county shall protect the public health, safety, and welfare
6by adopting an ordinance or resolution in regard to taxicab
7transportation service rendered in vehicles designed for carrying
8not more than eight persons, excluding the driver, which is operated
9within the jurisdiction of the city or county.
P5 1(b) Each city or county shall provide for, but is not limited to
2providing for, the following:
3(1) A policy for entry into the business of providing taxicab
4transportation service. The policy shall include, but need not be
5limited to, all of the
following provisions:
6(A) Employment, or an offer of employment, as a taxicab driver
7in the jurisdiction, including compliance with all of the
8requirements of the program adopted pursuant to paragraph (3),
9shall be a condition of issuance of a driver’s permit.
10(B) The driver’s permit shall become void upon termination of
11employment.
12(C) The driver’s permit shall state the name of the employer.
13(D) The employer shall notify the city or county upon
14termination of employment.
15(E) The driver shall return the permit to the city or county upon
16termination of employment.
17(2) The establishment or registration of rates for the
provision
18of taxicab transportation service.
19(3) (A) A mandatory controlled substance and alcohol testing
20certification program. The program shall include, but need not be
21limited to, all of the following requirements:
22(i) Drivers shall test negative for each of the controlled
23substances specified in Part 40 (commencing with Section 40.1)
24of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, before employment.
25Drivers shall test negative for these controlled substances and for
26alcohol as a condition of permit renewal or, if no periodic permit
27renewals are required, at such other times as the city or county
28shall designate. As used in this section, a negative test for alcohol
29means an alcohol screening test showing a breath alcohol
30concentration of less than 0.02 percent.
31(ii) Procedures shall be
substantially as in Part 40 (commencing
32with Section 40.1) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
33except that the driver shall show a valid California driver’s license
34at the time and place of testing, and except as provided otherwise
35in this section. Requirements for rehabilitation and for
36return-to-duty and followup testing and other requirements, except
37as provided otherwise in this section, shall be substantially as in
38Part 382 (commencing with Section 382.101) of Title 49 of the
39Code of Federal Regulations.
P6 1(iii) A test in one jurisdiction shall be accepted as meeting the
2same requirement in any other jurisdiction. Any negative test result
3shall be accepted for one year as meeting a requirement for periodic
4permit renewal testing or any other periodic testing in that
5jurisdiction or any other jurisdiction, if the driver has not tested
6positive subsequent to a negative result. However, an earlier
7negative result shall not be
accepted as meeting the
8pre-employment testing requirement for any subsequent
9employment, or any testing requirements under the program other
10than periodic testing.
11(iv) In the case of a self-employed independent driver, the test
12results shall be reported directly to the city or county, which shall
13notify the taxicab leasing company of record, if any, of positive
14results. In all other cases, the results shall be reported directly to
15the employing transportation operator, who may be required to
16notify the city or county of positive results.
17(v) All test results are confidential and shall not be released
18without the consent of the driver, except as authorized or required
19by law.
20(vi) Self-employed independent drivers shall be responsible for
21compliance with, and shall pay all costs of, this program with
22regard to
themselves. Employing transportation operators shall be
23responsible for compliance with, and shall pay all costs of, this
24program with respect to their employees and potential employees,
25except that an operator may require employees who test positive
26to pay the costs of rehabilitation and of return-to-duty and followup
27testing.
28(vii) Upon the request of a driver applying for a permit, the city
29or county shall give the driver a list of the consortia certified
30pursuant to Part 382 (commencing with Section 382.101) of Title
3149 of the Code of Federal Regulations that the city or county knows
32offer tests in or near the jurisdiction.
33(B) No evidence derived from a positive test result pursuant to
34the program shall be admissible in a criminal prosecution
35concerning unlawful possession, sale or distribution of controlled
36substances.
37(c) Each city or county may levy service charges, fees, or
38assessments in an amount sufficient to pay for the costs of carrying
39out an ordinance or resolution adopted in regard to taxicab
40transportation services pursuant to this section.
P7 1(d) Nothing in this section prohibits a city or county from
2adopting additional requirements for a taxicab to operate in its
3jurisdiction.
4(e) For purposes of this section, “employment” includes
5self-employment as an independent driver.
6
(f) This section shall not apply to a city or county, other than
7the City and County of San Francisco, on the date upon which the
8Director of Finance notifies the Speaker of the Assembly and the
9President pro Tempore of the Senate of the completion of the
state
10reorganization of transportation duties from the Public Utilities
11Commission to other agencies, if taxicab transportation services
12are included in the reorganization.
begin insertSection 53075.71 is added to the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert,
14to read:end insert
(a) Notwithstanding any other law, taxicab
16transportation services and taxicab drivers shall be subject to
17rules or regulations adopted by a city or a county as those rules
18or regulations existed on July 1, 2016, except as follows:
19
(1) Service charges, fees, or assessments levied on a taxicab
20company shall not exceed the amount in effect on July 1, 2016. No
21new or additional service charges, fees, or assessments shall be
22created.
23
(2) Fees for the issuance of taxi driver permits shall not exceed
24seventy-five dollars ($75) annually.
25
(3) A city or county shall not limit or prohibit prearranged trips,
26originated through
dispatch, Internet Web site, or online-enabled
27application, by a licensed taxicab.
28
(4) A city or county may limit the number of taxicab companies
29or vehicles that use taxi stand areas, pick up passengers at airports,
30or pick up street hails.
31
(5) A city or county may set a maximum fare structure for
32taxicab transportation services, subject to the following:
33
(A) The maximum fares shall not be lower than the fares that
34existed on July 1, 2016.
35
(B) A city or county shall not limit the ability of a taxicab
36transportation service to offer fares lower than the maximum fare
37structure.
38
(6) A city or county shall not regulate the type of device used
39by a taxicab company to calculate fares, including
the use of global
40positioning system metering as a form of calculating fares. Taxicab
P8 1companies shall disclose fares, fees, or rates to the customer before
2the customer accepts the ride so that the customer can make a
3knowledgeable decision. A taxicab company may disclose fares,
4fees, or rates on its Internet Web site or cellular telephone
5application.
6
(7) Local rules and regulations adopted prior to July 1, 2016,
7that ensure adequate service levels to all areas of a city’s or
8county’s jurisdiction and promote use of taxicab transportation
9services by individuals covered under the Americans with
10Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) shall remain in
11effect.
12
(b) Subdivision (a) applies to a charter city or a charter county,
13other than the City and County of San Francisco.
begin insertSection 53075.72 is added to the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert,
15to read:end insert
It is the intent of the Legislature that:
17
(a) Regulation of taxicab transportation services shall be
18modernized in order for taxicabs to better compete with all for-hire
19modes of transportation.
20
(b) Taxicab regulation shall be moved from the patchwork of
21various local requirements to one state agency to coincide with
22the Governor’s reorganization of transportation.
23
(c) Duties and responsibilities for the regulation of taxicab
24transportation services shall be established by state departments
25within the agency that handles all other modes of for-hire
26transportation.
27
(d) The
Governor shall propose the specific budget and statutory
28changes needed to establish duties and responsibilities to the
29agency that handles all other modes of for-hire transportation.
30
(e) Conforming changes shall be made to this code and other
31codes.
32
(f) A city or county shall not impose any rule or regulation
33governing taxicab transportation services that is inconsistent with
34or in addition to the requirements established by state departments
35within the agency that handles all other modes of for-hire
36transportation.
The Legislature finds and declares that taxicabs face
38a substantial competitive disadvantage due to the numerous and
39differing requirements from city to city while all other modes of
40for-hire transportation are regulated by one statewide entity, and,
P9 1therefore, the regulation of taxicab transportation services and
2taxicab drivers is an issue of statewide concern and not a municipal
3affair, as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the
4California Constitution. Therefore, this act shall apply to charter
5cities and charter counties.
The Legislature finds and declares that a special law
7is necessary and that a general law cannot be made applicable
8within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California
9Constitution because of the unique medallion system of the City
10and County of San Francisco.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
12this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
13local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
14pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
154 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
All matter omitted in this version of the bill appears in the bill as introduced|amended in the Senate, August 19, 2016. (JR11)
O
91