BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                             Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
                            2015 - 2016  Regular  Session

          AB 666 (Mark Stone) - Juveniles:  sealing of records
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Version: July 15, 2015          |Policy Vote: PUB. S. 5 - 1      |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Urgency: No                     |Mandate: Yes                    |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Hearing Date: August 17, 2015   |Consultant: Jolie Onodera       |
          |                                |                                |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. 

          

          Bill  
          Summary:  AB 666 would make numerous revisions concerning the  
          sealing of juvenile records and the dismissal of juvenile cases,  
          as specified.


          Fiscal  
          Impact:  
           Potentially significant state court costs in the range of  
            $200,000 to $400,000 (General Fund*) annually to comply with  
            the administrative and noticing requirements specified in the  
            bill. 
           Minor one-time costs of $10,000 to $20,000 (General Fund*) to  
            the Judicial Council for the creation of rules and necessary  
            forms.
           Potentially significant ongoing state-reimbursable costs in  
            the hundreds of thousands dollars (General Fund) annually to  
            local law enforcement agencies and probation departments to  
            seal and subsequently destroy all specified records in the  
            entity's custody. Costs would vary by county and be dependent  







          AB 666 (Mark Stone)                                    Page 1 of  
          ?
          
          
            on the number and volume of records to be sealed and  
            destroyed.


          *Trial Court Trust Fund



          Background:  Existing law requires the juvenile court to order the petition  
          of a minor to be dismissed if the minor satisfactorily completes  
          a term of probation or an informal program of supervision, as  
          specified, and requires the court to seal all records, without a  
          petition from the minor, in the custody of the juvenile court  
          pertaining to the dismissed petition, except as specified. Under  
          existing law, the court is prohibited from automatically  
          dismissing a petition and sealing the records of a minor who has  
          completed a term of probation for any of the serious offenses  
          listed in WIC § 707(b). (Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) §  
          786(a).)
          Additionally, existing law prohibits, notwithstanding any other  
          provision of law, the court from ordering a person's records  
          sealed in any case in which the person has been found to have  
          committed an offense listed in WIC § 707(b) [30 enumerated  
          offenses including murder, arson, robbery, and rape] when he or  
          she had attained 14 years of age or older, which are offenses  
          for which certain minors could be tried in adult court under  
          specified circumstances. (WIC § 781(a).)


          Once the court has ordered the records sealed, the arrest  
          upon which the judgment was deferred is deemed never to  
          have occurred. The relief consists of sealing the records  
          in the custody of the juvenile court, except the  
          prosecuting attorney and the probation department are  
          allowed access to these records after they are sealed for  
          the limited purpose of determining whether the minor is  
          eligible for deferred entry of judgment, and the court may  
          access the file for the limited purpose of verifying the  
          prior jurisdictional status of a ward who is petitioning  
          the court to resume its jurisdiction, as specified. 

          This bill seeks to additionally require the court to order  
          records in the custody of law enforcement agencies, the  
          probation department, and the DOJ to be sealed upon a  








          AB 666 (Mark Stone)                                    Page 2 of  
          ?
          
          
          juvenile petition being dismissed. Additionally, this bill  
          expands the population of individuals eligible to have  
          their records sealed upon having their petition dismissed  
          to minors who satisfactorily compete a term of probation  
          for offenses listed in WIC § 707(b) but were under the age  
          of 14 at the time of the offense. 


          Proposed Law:  
           This bill would revise existing provisions of law related to  
          the sealing of juvenile records and the dismissal of juvenile  
          cases, as follows: 
           Requires a court to order sealed all records pertaining to a  
            dismissed petition in the custody of the juvenile court, and  
            in the custody of law enforcement agencies, the probation  
            department, or the DOJ.


           Requires the court to send a copy of the order to each agency  
            and official named therein, directing the agency to seal its  
            records and specifying a date thereafter to destroy the sealed  
            records.  


           States that each such agency and official shall seal the  
            records in its custody as directed by the order, advise the  
            court of its compliance and thereupon seal the copy of the  
            court's order or sealing of records that was received.  


           Requires the court to provide notice to the minor and minor's  
            counsel that it has ordered the petition dismissed and the  
            record sealed in the case, including notice of the minor's  
            right to nondisclosure of the arrest and proceedings as  
            specified.


           States that upon the court's order of dismissal of the  
            petition, the arrest and other proceedings in the case shall  
            be deemed not to have occurred and the person who was the  
            subject of the petition may properly reply accordingly to any  
            inquiry by employers, educational institutions or other  
            persons or entities regarding the arrest and proceedings in  
            the case.








          AB 666 (Mark Stone)                                    Page 3 of  
          ?
          
          


           Provides that satisfactory completion of informal supervision  
            or another term of probation shall be deemed to have occurred  
            if the person has no new finding of wardship or conviction for  
            a felony offense for or a misdemeanor involving moral  
            turpitude during the period of supervision or probation and if  
            he or she has not failed substantially to comply with the  
            reasonable orders of supervision or probation that are within  
            his or her capacity to perform.  


           Specifies that a record that has been ordered sealed by the  
            court under this section may be accessed, inspected or used  
            only under the following circumstances:


               o      By the prosecuting attorney and the probation  
                 department for the limited purpose of determining whether  
                 the minor is eligible for deferred entry of judgment or  
                 for a program of supervision, as defined.


               o      By the court for the limited purpose of verifying  
                 the prior jurisdictional purpose of a ward who is  
                 petitioning the court to resume its jurisdiction.


               o      If a new petition has been filed against a minor for  
                 a felony offense, by the probation department for the  
                 limited purpose of identifying the minor's previous  
                 court-ordered programs or placements, and in that event  
                 solely to determine the individual's eligibility or  
                 suitability for remedial programs or services. The  
                 information obtained under this exception shall not be  
                 disseminated to other agencies or individuals, except as  
                 necessary to implement referral to a remedial program or  
                 service, and shall not be used to support the imposition  
                 of penalties or detention or other sanctions upon the  
                 minor.


               o      By the person whose record has been sealed, upon his  
                 or her request and petition to the court to permit  








          AB 666 (Mark Stone)                                    Page 4 of  
          ?
          
          
                 inspection of the records.


                 States that access to or inspection of a sealed record  
               authorized by these provisions shall not be deemed an  
               opening of the record and shall not require notice to any  
               other agency.


                 Requires the Judicial Council to adopt rules of court,  
               and shall make available appropriate forms, providing for  
               the standardized implementation of this section by the  
               juvenile courts.


                 Revises the exclusion of WIC § 707(b) offenses from  
               sealing under this section to specify that the offense must  
               have been committed when the minor was 14 years of age or  
               older unless the finding on that offense was dismissed or  
               was reduced to a lesser offense that is not listed in WIC §  
               707(b).


                 States the finding of the Legislature that in order to  
               protect the privacy of children who have had their juvenile  
               delinquency court records sealed, it is necessary that  
               related records in the custody of law enforcement agencies,  
               the probation department, or any other public agency also  
               be sealed.


                 Authorizes the court, in making its order to seal the  
               record and dismiss the instant petition pursuant to this  
               section, include an order to seal a record relating to, or  
               to dismiss, any prior petition or petitions that have been  
               filed or sustained against the individual and that appear  
               to the satisfaction of the court to meet the sealing and  
               dismissal criteria otherwise described in this section.


                 Authorizes a record sealed to be accessed by a law  
               enforcement agency, probation department, court, or other  
               state or local agency that has custody of the sealed record  
               for the limited purpose of complying with data collection  








          AB 666 (Mark Stone)                                    Page 5 of  
          ?
          
          
               or data reporting requirements that are imposed by other  
               provisions of law. However, no personally identifying  
               information from a sealed record accessed under this  
               subdivision may be released, disseminated, or published by  
               or through an agency, department, court, or individual that  
               has accessed or obtained information from the sealed  
               record.


                 Provides that a court may authorize a researcher or  
               research organization to access information contained in  
               records that have been sealed pursuant to WIC §§ 781 or 786  
               for the purpose of conducting research on juvenile justice  
               populations, practices, policies, or trends, subject to  
               specified conditions.




          Related  
          Legislation:  SB 504 (Lara) 2015 would provide that only a  
          person 26 years of age or older may be charged a fee for  
          petitioning the court for an order sealing his or her record.  
          This bill is pending hearing in the Assembly Committee on  
          Appropriations.
          AB 989 (Cooper) 2015 would provide limited access to otherwise  
          sealed juvenile records to district attorneys and probation  
          departments, as specified. This bill is pending on the Senate  
          Floor.
          
          Prior Legislation:  SB 1038 (Leno) Chapter 249/2014 provides for  
          the automatic dismissal of juvenile petitions and sealing of  
          records, as specified, in cases where a juvenile offender  
          successfully completes probation, and authorizes the juvenile  
          court to dismiss a delinquency petition after a person reaches  
          the age of 21.


          Staff  
          Comments:  The Judicial Council has indicated a potentially  
          significant ongoing workload impact to identify agencies and/or  
          individuals named in a juvenile order to seal records, send the  
          order to the named agencies and/or officials, receive and  
          properly file the order of compliance, and provide notice to the  








          AB 666 (Mark Stone)                                    Page 6 of  
          ?
          
          
          minor and minor's counsel that the court has complied with this  
          section. Assuming 15 to 30 minutes of court clerk time to  
          complete the noticing and other administrative activities  
          specified in the bill for an estimated 50 percent of potentially  
          impacted juvenile petitions filed (approximately 15,500  
          petitions), after adjusting for petitions that would not qualify  
          to have records sealed, would result in increased costs in the  
          range of $200,000 to $400,000 per year. To the extent the number  
          of juvenile petitions filed fluctuates from year to year would  
          impact costs accordingly.  
          The Judicial Council has also indicated one-time minor costs of  
          $10,000 to $20,000 for the creation of rules and necessary  
          forms.


          By mandating a higher level of service on local agencies,  
          specifically by requiring local law enforcement agencies and  
          probation departments to seal records for the specified juvenile  
          cases in their custody, this bill creates a state mandated local  
          program. Ongoing costs to seal and subsequently destroy all  
          specified records in the entity's custody would vary by county  
          and be dependent on the number and volume of records to be  
          sealed and destroyed. While the records would be sealed upon  
          order of the court, the provisions of this bill mandate the  
          court to order this higher level of service so it is likely  
          these costs could be determined to be reimbursable by the state.


          The DOJ has indicated no significant impact associated with the  
          provisions of this measure.




                                      -- END --