BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 667| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 667 Author: Wagner (R) Amended: 7/8/15 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE BANKING & F.I. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 7/1/15 AYES: Block, Vidak, Galgiani, Hall, Hueso, Lara, Morrell SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 8/27/15 AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Hall, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 6/2/15 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Broker-dealers: exemptions: finders SOURCE: Corporations Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar DIGEST: This bill defines a finder, as specified, and exempts a finder from the requirement to be licensed as a broker-dealer. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Defines "broker-dealer" as any person engaged in the business of effecting transactions in securities in California for the AB 667 Page 2 account of others or for his or her own account (Corporations Code Section 25004). 2)Provides that, unless otherwise exempted from the requirement to obtain a certificate from the commissioner, no broker-dealer may effect any transaction in or induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of any security in California unless that broker-dealer has first applied for and secured from the commissioner a certificate authorizing that person to act in that capacity (Corporations Code Section 25210). 3)Authorizes several exemptions from the requirement to hold a certificate as a broker-dealer, as specified (Corporations Code Sections 25004, 25200, 25206, 25207, and 25208). 4)Authorizes the Department of Business Oversight (DBO) to pursue the following types of enforcement actions against persons who are not licensed as broker-dealers, but who are acting in a manner that requires such licensure. DBO may: a) Issue an order to desist and refrain from the activity or activities that warrant licensure, until the required license is obtained (Corporations Code Section 25532). b) Levy an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 for a first violation, up to $10,000 for a second violation, and up to $15,000 for a third and subsequent violation (Corporations Code Section 25252), and include in the administrative action imposing such penalty a claim for ancillary relief, including but not limited to a claim for restitution or disgorgement or damages on behalf of persons injured by the act or practice giving rise to the action (Corporations Code Section 25254). c) Take possession of the property, business, and assets of such person (Corporations Code Section 25253). d) Bring an action in the name of the people of the State of California in Superior Court to enjoin the acts or practices of the person violating the law and enforce compliance, and, if the commissioner determines it is in the public interest, to include in that action a claim for ancillary relief, including but not limited to a claim for AB 667 Page 3 restitution or disgorgement or damages on behalf of persons injured by the act or practice constituting the subject matter of the action (Corporations Code Section 25530). 5)Provides that a person who purchases a security from or sells a security to a broker-dealer that is required to be licensed and who has not, at the time of the sale or purchase, applied for and secured from the commissioner a certificate in effect at the time of sale or purchase, may bring an action for rescission of the sale or purchase, or, if the plaintiff or the defendant no longer owns the security, for damages, as specified (Corporations Code Section 25501.5). This bill: 1)Defines a finder as a natural person who, for direct or indirect compensation, introduces or refers one or more accredited investors, as defined, to an issuer, or an issuer to one or more accredited investors, solely for the purpose of a potential offer or sale of securities of the issuer in an issuer transaction in this state, and as someone who does not do any of the following: a) Provide services to an issuer for a transaction or a series of related transactions whose purchase price exceeds $15 million in the aggregate. b) Participate in negotiating any of the terms of the offer or sale of the securities. c) Advise any party to the transaction regarding the value of the securities or the advisability of investing in, purchasing, or selling the securities. d) Conduct any due diligence on the part of any party to the transaction. e) Sell or offer for sale in connection with the issuer transaction any securities of the issuer that are owned, directly or indirectly, by the finder. f) Receive, directly or indirectly, possession or custody of any funds in connection with the issuer transaction. AB 667 Page 4 g) Knowingly receive compensation in connection with any offer or sale of securities, unless the sale is qualified by the Commissioner of Business Oversight (commissioner) or the security or transaction is exempt or not otherwise subject to qualification. h) Make any disclosure other than the following limited disclosures: the name, address, and contact information of the issuer; the name, type, price, and aggregate amount of any securities being offered in the issuer transaction; and the issuer's industry, location, and years in business. 2)Requires each finder to submit a statement of information about him or herself and pay a filing fee of $300 to DBO before engaging in any authorized finder activities. 3)Require each finder to submit a renewal statement of information to DBO within 30 days of the anniversary of the finder's initial statement of information, and annually, thereafter, and to pay a fee of $275 when submitting each renewal statement of information. 4)Requires, concurrent with each introduction or referral of a potential investor to an issuer, each finder to obtain the informed, written consent of the person introduced or referred, on an agreement that discloses information about the type and amount of compensation that has been or will be paid to the finder, and that contains information regarding actual or potential conflicts of interest that may exist in connection with the finder's activities. 5)Provides that a finder who satisfies all of the conditions above is exempt from licensure as a broker-dealer. 6)Provides that in the event a natural person does not meet the definition of a finder, as set forth in the bill, or does not satisfy all of the requirements applicable to finders, as set forth in the bill, an investor that is introduced or referred by that natural person to an issuer, and who purchases securities of that issuer following that introduction or referral, shall have the right to pursue any applicable remedy afforded under state law, including, without limitation, any applicable remedies available pursuant to Corporations Code AB 667 Page 5 Section 25501.5. Background This bill is sponsored by the Corporations Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar to promote and facilitate a regulatory framework to govern the activities and accountability of finders, provide statutory and regulatory certainty for finders and the businesses that rely upon them, and protect investors. According to this bill's sponsor, "it is widely recognized among business participants that many individuals and entities act as 'finders' in the State of California in connection with securities transactions. Finders - generally viewed under California law to mean persons who introduce issuers and investors to each other without negotiating on behalf of either party - are often critical to the success of capital-raising efforts by start-up companies and other small to mid-sized companies that would otherwise be unable to engage a broker-dealer or access needed capital. In fact, it is believed that this is the method by which a vast majority of capital is raised to fund early stage businesses." This bill's sponsor asserts that the vast majority of finders are not registered as broker-dealers, often resulting in inadvertent violations of broker-dealer registration requirements. By relying on finders who could be engaged in illegal broker-dealer conduct, companies risk severe consequences. These risks are either not known or just ignored by issuers and finders. The lack of certainty continues to jeopardize finders and the businesses which rely upon them for crucial funding, as well as other investors. Comments This bill is intended to create regulatory certainty for finders and the businesses which use them, by codifying a set of activities that will be legal when performed by persons without a broker-dealer license, who meet the bill's definition of a finder, and who comply with the bill's requirements for finders. This bill's sponsor and supporters believe that by creating a bright-line which clearly distinguishes allowable finder activities from those which do not meet the bill's definition of AB 667 Page 6 finder activities, the bill will encourage persons who act as finders to comply with the bill's requirements. The value of the bill to persons who follow it is the assurance that they need not become licensed as broker-dealers. Persons who do not meet the bill's finder definition may require licensure as broker-dealers, depending on their activities. Prior Legislation AB 713 (Wagner, 2014 ) was substantially similar to AB 667 but imposed lower filing fees for finders than those contained in AB 667. AB 713 was held on the Senate Appropriations Committee Suspense File. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, AB 667 will result in one-time moderate costs of $50,000 to $100,000 to the State Corporations Fund to cover costs for DBO to promulgate regulations. The bill will result in potentially significant ongoing costs in the range of $155,000 to $300,000 annually to the State Corporations Fund, partially offset by fee revenue, to register and renew finders. At the specified registration fee of $300 per finder, estimated revenue will not cover ongoing costs based on an estimated 80 to 150 finders to be registered and examined annually. First year revenue would be $24,000 to $45,000, and annual ongoing offsetting fee revenue would be $22,000 to $41,250. SUPPORT: (Verified8/27/15) Corporations Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar (source) McConnell, Dunning & Barwick LLP Law Offices of Douglas M. Wade PLC OPPOSITION: (Verified8/27/15) AB 667 Page 7 None received ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The State Bar Corporations Committee believes that there is a need for some form of limited regulation of finders as an essential component of an efficient capitals market. "AB 667 effectively addresses this need by creating a straightforward definition of finder and clarifying the precise activities in which a finder may or may not engage. Moreover, we believe that the reporting and informed consent requirements under AB 667 help ensure greater accountability, investor protection, and regulatory oversight." McConnell, Dunning & Barwick LLP and the Law Offices of Douglas M. Wade write, "AB 667 creates a straightforward definition of a 'finder' and clarifies the scope of capital securities fundraising activities in which a finder may engage, including limiting the investors the finder may introduce to 'accredited' investors, and prohibiting the finder from taking custody of funds. By providing clear guidance and establishing meaningful reporting and other requirements for finders, AB 667 will ensure better market transparency, proper accountability, and additional investor protection while at the same time facilitating capital formation for business entities in California." ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 76-0, 6/2/15 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins NO VOTE RECORDED: Chávez, Grove, Harper, Jones-Sawyer Prepared by:Eileen Newhall / B. & F.I. / (916) 651-4102 AB 667 Page 8 8/31/15 15:45:58 **** END ****