BILL NUMBER: AB 670	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN SENATE  SEPTEMBER 3, 2015
	AMENDED IN SENATE  JUNE 23, 2015
	AMENDED IN SENATE  JUNE 15, 2015
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  APRIL 6, 2015

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Irwin

                        FEBRUARY 25, 2015

   An act to amend Section 11549.3 of the Government Code, relating
to technology.


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 670, as amended, Irwin. Information technology security.
   (1) Existing law establishes, within the Government Operations
Agency, the Department of Technology under the supervision of the
Director of Technology, who is also known as the State Chief
Information Officer. The department is generally responsible for the
approval and oversight of information technology projects by, among
other things, consulting with state agencies during initial project
planning to ensure that project proposals are based on well-defined
programmatic needs.
   Existing law establishes, within the department, the Office of
Information Security under the supervision of the Chief of the Office
of Information Security. Existing law sets forth the authority of
the office, including, but not limited to, the authority to conduct,
or require to be conducted, an independent security assessment of any
state agency, department, or  office   office,
 the cost of which is to be funded by the state agency,
department, or office being assessed. 
   This bill would, instead, impose a duty on the office to require
it to conduct, or require to be conducted, an independent security
assessment of every state agency, department, or office at least once
every 2 years and would maintain the requirement that the state
agency, department, or office being assessed fund the costs of the
independent security assessment. This bill would require an
independent security assessment to include specific components, to
the extent practicable, and authorize the department to require a
state agency, department, or office not in compliance with any
recommendation made in the independent security assessment to
redirect its available and authorized funds to pay the costs of
complying with the recommendation.  
   This bill would require the results of an independent security
assessment to be available only to the state agency, department, or
office that was assessed. This bill would restrict the transmission
or communication of the results of an independent security assessment
and any related information to state government employees and state
contractors who have been approved as necessary to receive this
information in order to perform the assessment. The bill would
require the department to adopt standards, to be included within the
State Administrative Manual, setting forth the manner for the
aggregate of the results of an independent security assessment to be
transmitted to the department.  
    This bill would require the results of an independent security
assessment, the aggregate of the results of an independent security
assessment transmitted to the department, and any related information
to be subject to all disclosure and confidentiality provisions
pursuant to any state law, including, but not limited to, the
California Public Records Act, including provisions of the act that
exclude from the disclosure requirements, certain security records
that reveal the vulnerabilities of an information technology system.
This bill would require data produced during the creation of an
independent security assessment to be destroyed within 1 year of its
date of creation, unless the Office of Emergency Services determines
that retention for a longer period of time is necessary for state
security.  
   This bill would additionally require the office, in consultation
with the Office of Emergency Services, to require no fewer than 35
independent security assessments of state entities each year and
determine basic standards of services to be performed as part of an
independent security assessment. The bill would require the state
agency, department, or office being assessed to fund the costs of its
independent security assessment. The bill would require the office
and the Office of Emergency Services to receive the complete results
of an independent security assessment. This bill would prohibit,
during the process of conducting an independent security assessment,
the disclosure of information and records concerning the independent
security assessment, except that the information and records would be
authorized to be transmitted to state employees and state
contractors with specific duties relating to the independent security
assessment. The bill would require the disclosure of the results of
a completed independent security assessment under state law. 

   This bill would require the office, in consultation with the
Office of Emergency Services, to rank state entities on an
information security risk index, as specified. The bill would require
the office to report to the Department of Technology and the Office
of Emergency Services any state entity found noncompliant with
information security requirements. The bill would further require the
office to notify the Office of Emergency Services, Department of the
California Highway Patrol, and the Department of Justice of any
criminal or alleged criminal cyber activity affecting any state
entity or critical infrastructure of state government. The bill would
authorize the office to conduct or require to be conducted an audit
of information security to ensure program compliance, the cost of
which to be funded by the state agency, department, or office being
audited. 
   This bill would  also  authorize the Military
Department to perform an independent security assessment as described
above.  This bill would authorize the Military Department to
mitigate the impact of a cyber attack or assist a law enforcement
investigation into cyber security upon the request of the Office of
Emergency Services, a state law enforcement agency, or a state
agency, department, or office. This bill would further authorize the
Military Department to perform a cyber security assessment or respond
to a cyber security incident impacting state infrastructure upon the
request of the Office of Emergency Services.  
   This bill would require state entities, as defined, rather than
certain information security officers, to comply with policies and
procedures issued by the office. The bill would also make technical,
nonsubstantive changes. 
   (2) Existing law requires that a statute that limits the public's
right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of
public officials and agencies be adopted with findings to demonstrate
the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting
that interest.
   This bill would limit access to  the results 
 information and records  of an  ongoing 
independent security assessment  and related records
 and would make findings to demonstrate the interest
protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that
interest.
   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  SECTION 1.  Section 11549.3 of the Government Code is amended to
read:
   11549.3.  (a) The  director   chief 
shall establish an information security program.  The office
shall report to the Department of Technology any state agency found
to be noncompliant with information security program requirements.
 The program responsibilities include, but are not limited
to, all of the following:
   (1) The creation, updating, and publishing of information security
and privacy policies, standards, and procedures for state agencies
in the State Administrative Manual.
   (2) The creation, issuance, and maintenance of policies,
standards, and procedures directing state agencies to effectively
manage security and risk for both of the following:
   (A) Information technology, which includes, but is not limited to,
all electronic technology systems and services, automated
information handling, system design and analysis, conversion of data,
computer programming, information storage and retrieval,
telecommunications, requisite system controls, simulation, electronic
commerce, and all related interactions between people and machines.
   (B) Information that is identified as mission critical,
confidential, sensitive, or personal, as defined and published by the
 Office of Information Security.   office.

   (3) The creation, issuance, and maintenance of policies,
standards, and procedures directing state agencies for the
collection, tracking, and reporting of information regarding security
and privacy incidents.
   (4) The creation, issuance, and maintenance of policies,
standards, and procedures directing state agencies in the
development, maintenance, testing, and filing of each  state
 agency's disaster recovery plan.
   (5) Coordination of the activities of  state  agency
information security officers, for purposes of integrating statewide
security initiatives and ensuring compliance with information
security and privacy policies and standards.
   (6) Promotion and enhancement of the state agencies' risk
management and privacy programs through education, awareness,
collaboration, and consultation.
   (7) Representing the state before the federal government, other
state agencies, local government entities, and private industry on
issues that have statewide impact on information security and
privacy.
   (b)  An information security officer appointed pursuant to
  All   state entities defined in 
Section 11546.1 shall implement the policies and procedures issued by
the  Office of Information Security,   office,
 including, but not limited to, performing both of the following
duties:
   (1) Comply with the information security and privacy policies,
standards, and procedures issued pursuant to this chapter by the
 Office of Information Security.   office. 

   (2) Comply with filing requirements and incident notification by
providing timely information and reports as required by 
policy or directives of  the office.
   (c) (1) The office  shall   may 
conduct, or require to be conducted, an independent security
assessment of every state agency, department, or office  at
least once every two years.   .  The cost of the
independent security assessment shall be funded by the state agency,
department, or office being assessed.  The independent
security assessment shall include, to the extent practicable, all of
the following components and shall be conducted in compliance with
the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special
Publication (SP) 800-53 Controls:  
   (A) Vulnerability scanning, that includes, but is not limited to,
all of the following:  
   (i) Validation that IT systems have currently supported software,
with all necessary security patches and updates applied. 

   (ii) Validation that system security configurations are in
compliance with NIST standards.  
   (iii) Validation that the network architecture is arranged so as
to separate internal, publicly accessible, and external zones, along
with a mechanism to identify and alert on attempted intrusions.
 
   (B) Penetration testing, when determined appropriate by the Office
of Emergency Services.  
   (C) A report on the number, severity, and nature of identified
vulnerabilities and recommendations for remediation and risk
mitigation.  
   (2) (A) The Military Department may perform an independent
security assessment required by paragraph (1).  
   (B) The Military Department may mitigate the impact of a cyber
attack or assist a law enforcement investigation into cyber security
upon the request of the Office of Emergency Services, a state law
enforcement agency, or a state agency, department, or office.
 
   (C) The Military Department may perform a cyber security
assessment or respond to a cyber security incident impacting state
infrastructure upon the request of the Office of Emergency Services.
 
   (d) The Department of Technology may require a state agency,
department, or office to redirect any funds within its budget that
may be legally expended for these purposes, to pay the costs of
becoming compliant with any recommendation made in an independent
security assessment.  
   (e)  
   (2) In addition to the independent security assessments authorized
by paragraph (1), the office, in consultation with the Office of
Emergency Services, shall perform all the following duties: 

   (A) Annually require no fewer than thirty-five (35) state entities
to perform an independent security assessment, the cost of which
shall be funded by the state agency, department, or office being
assessed.  
   (B) Determine criteria and rank state entities based on an
information security risk index that may include, but not be limited
to, analysis of the relative amount of the following factors within
state agencies:  
   (i) Personally identifiable information protected by law. 

   (ii) Health information protected by law.  
   (iii) Confidential financial data.  
   (iv) Self-certification of compliance and indicators of unreported
noncompliance with security provisions in the following areas: 

   (I) Information asset management.  
   (II) Risk management.  
   (III) Information security program management.  
   (IV) Information security incident management.  
   (V) Technology recovery planning.  
   (C) Determine the basic standards of services to be performed as
part of independent security assessments required by this
subdivision.  
   (3) The Military Department may perform an independent security
assessment of any state agency, department, or office, the cost of
which shall be funded by the state agency, department, or office
being assessed. 
    (d)   (1)    
The office, Military Department, or entity   State 
 agencies and entities  required to conduct  or receive
 an independent security assessment pursuant to subdivision (c)
shall transmit the  complete  results of that assessment
 only to the state agency, department, or office that was the
subject of that assessment.   and recommendations for
mitigating system vulnerabilities, if any, to the office and the
Office of Emergency Services.  
   (e) The office shall report to the Department of Technology and
the Office of Emergency Services any state entity found to be
noncompliant with information security program requirements. 

   (2) The office, Military Department, or entity required to conduct
an independent security assessment pursuant to subdivision (c) shall
transmit an aggregate of the results of that assessment to the
Department of Technology.  
   (3) The Department of Technology shall adopt standards, to be
included within the State Administrative Manual, setting forth the
requirements for the office, Military Department, or entity required
to conduct an independent security assessment pursuant to subdivision
(c) to transmit, pursuant to paragraph (2), the aggregate of the
results of that assessment to the Department of Technology,
including, but not limited to, all of the following: 

   (A) Aggregated, statistical information relevant to the assessment
results, including, but not limited to, the number of identified
vulnerabilities categorized by high, medium, and low risk. These
results shall not include any specific information relative to the
nature of the risk that is potentially exploitable. 

   (B) Prioritization of vulnerabilities.  
   (C) Identification of relevant internal resources. 

   (D) Strategy for addressing and mitigating those vulnerabilities.

   (f)  (1) Transmission or communication of the results of
an independent security assessment performed pursuant to subdivision
(c) and any related information shall be restricted to  
Notwithstanding   any other law, during the process of
conducting an independent security assessment pursuant to subdivision
(c), information and records concerning the independent 
security assessment are confi   dential and shall not be
disclosed, except that the information and records may be transmitted
to  state  government  employees and state
contractors who have been approved as necessary to receive 
this   the  information  in order 
 and records  to perform that  independent security
 assessment  by the office, Military Department, or
entity required to conduct the independent security assessment.
  ,  subsequent remediation activity, or
monitoring of remediation activity. 
   (2) The results of  an   a completed 
independent security assessment performed pursuant to subdivision
(c),  the aggregate of the results of an independent security
assessment transmitted to the Department of Technology pursuant to
subdivision (e),  and any related information shall be
subject to all disclosure and confidentiality provisions pursuant to
any state law, including, but not limited to, the California Public
Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7
of Title 1), including, but not limited to, Section 6254.19.

   (3) Data produced during the creation of an independent security
assessment performed pursuant to subdivision (c) shall be destroyed
within one year of its date of creation, unless the Office of
Emergency Services determines that retention for a longer period of
time is necessary for state security.  
   (g) The office may conduct or require to be conducted an audit of
information security to ensure program compliance, the cost of which
shall be funded by the state agency, department, or office being
audited.  
   (h) The office shall notify the Office of Emergency Services,
Department of the California Highway Patrol, and the Department of
Justice regarding any criminal or alleged criminal cyber activity
affecting any state entity or critical infrastructure of state
government. 
  SEC. 2.  The Legislature finds and declares that Section 1 of this
act, which amends Section 11549.3 of the Government Code, imposes a
limitation on the public's right of access to the meetings of public
bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the
meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution.
Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the
following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this
limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
   The state has a very strong interest in protecting its information
technology systems from intrusion, because those systems contain
confidential information and play a critical role in the performance
of the duties of state government. Thus, information regarding the
specific vulnerabilities of those systems must be protected to
preclude use of that information to facilitate attacks on those
systems.