BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 670


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 20, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          670 (Irwin) - As Amended April 6, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Privacy and Consumer           |Vote:|11 - 0       |
          |Committee:   |Protection                     |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill requires the Office of Information Security (OIS),  
          within the Department of Technology (CalTech), to conduct  
          security assessments of the information technology resources of  
          every state agency, department or office at least once every two  








                                                                     AB 670


                                                                    Page  2





          years.  Specifically, this bill:  


          1)Requires the assessment to be conducted in compliance with the  
            National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special  
            Publication (SP) 800-53 Controls, and to include, to the  
            extent practicable, vulnerability scanning, penetration  
            testing, and a report on the number, severity, and nature of  
            identified vulnerabilities and recommendations for remediation  
            and risk mitigation.

          2)Authorizes CalTech to require any agency out of compliance  
            with the assessment requirement to redirect any funds within  
            the agency's budget, which may be legally expended for these  
            purposes, to pay the costs of the assessment. 



          3)Authorizes the Governor's Office of Emergency Services (OES)  
            to conduct the strategic direction of security assessments  
            performed by the Military Department's Computer Network  
            Defense Team (CND-T)

          4)Requires CalTech to adopt standards that set forth the manner  
            for the assessed agency or entity to communicate the  
            assessment results to CalTech.

          5)Requires assessment results and relative aggregated reports to  
            be confidential and exempt from Freedom of Information Act  
            distribution and protected from disclosure by Public Records  
            Act requests. 

          Requires data produced by assessments to be retained by all  
          parties for no longer than one year, unless determined otherwise  
          by OES


          FISCAL EFFECT:









                                                                     AB 670


                                                                    Page  3






          1)Major state costs of approximately $5 million (GF) for two  
            years, for 32 PYs for the California Military Department to  
            perform the CND-T assessments.


          2)On-going costs to state agencies, in the range of $20,000 to  
            $200,000, per agency for the assessments. Costs will vary by  
            agency depending on their current security budgets and to what  
            extent this bill mandates a broader or more frequent security  
            assessment and redirection of funds.  


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. According to the author, "Cybersecurity attacks are  
            on the rise and California state government is a priority  
            target because of the value and sheer size of its networks and  
            data.  The state bears a responsibility in actively defending  
            the information it collects as well as the critical networks  
            that Californians rely on for services. The State  
            Administrative Manual currently includes the provisions  
            contained in this bill, but there is no mechanism of  
            enforcement and less than one-third of state agencies,  
            departments, or offices have conducted or received an  
            assessment to date.  These preventative assessments are a  
            vital tool in combating the increasingly sophisticated  
            cyber-attacks because they reveal vulnerabilities, demonstrate  
            the extent of potential exploitation, and provide  
            recommendations for remediation and risk mitigation." 


            This bill seeks to increase the security of California state  
            computer networks by requiring CalTech to conduct a security  
            assessment of each agency, department and office under its  
            jurisdiction every two years.  










                                                                     AB 670


                                                                    Page  4





          2)Background. According to the California Military Department  
            (CMD), California's size and prominence makes it vulnerable to  
            cyber incidents.  In 2012, 17% of the data breaches recorded  
            in the United States took place in California - more than any  
            other state; and the number of reported breaches in California  
            increased by 28% in 2013.  California leads the nation in high  
            tech employment and cyber innovation, with 40% of all U.S.  
            venture capital investment in cyber residing here. A targeted  
            attack on critical infrastructure and key resources could  
            cause up to $1 billion dollars of economic impact to  
            California each day until services are restored.  According to  
            the State Attorney General's 2014 Data Breach Report,  
            organizations should conduct risk assessments at least  
            annually and update privacy and security practices based on  
            the findings.


          3)CalTech and OIS.  CalTech is the central IT organization for  
            the State and is responsible for the approval and oversight of  
            all state IT projects. OIS, within CalTech, is responsible for  
            ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of  
            state systems and applications, and ensuring the protection of  
            state information.  OIS represents California to federal,  
            state, and local government entities, higher education,  
            private industry, and others on security-related matters.   
            According to the author's office, there are a total of 384  
            state entities subject to the OIS (which excludes some  
            constitutional offices).  Under current law, OIS is authorized  
            to conduct independent security assessments of any state  
            agency, department or office, but is not required to do so. 


          4)National Guard. The CMD, which oversees the state's National  
            Guard units, supports state law enforcement and OES in the  
            prevention and protection of supported networks, which helps  
            enable the state to respond to vulnerabilities or attacks.   
            OES coordinates and requests the support of the CMD to provide  
            cyber defense, incident support and cyber recovery operations.









                                                                     AB 670


                                                                    Page  5





          The CMD temporarily maintains CND-T, a pilot project funded in  
            the Budget Act of 2014.  CND-T's goal is to "assist agencies  
            by providing actionable products, assistance, and services  
            designed to improve overall cyber security compliance, reduce  
            risk, and protect the public." CND-T currently has nine full  
            time staff, with the capability to add six more. CMD will also  
            draw upon a soon-to-be created 39-member Cyber Protection Team  
            under its command, which has been authorized by the federal  
            government; it will be based in San Diego and operational in  
            2017. According to the CMD, in the first quarter of FY2015,  
            the CND-T performed 2,863 end-point scans identifying 39,880  
            risks with an average of 13.6 vulnerabilities per system.   
            Agencies supported by the CND-T generally show a ten-fold  
            reduction in system vulnerabilities. According to the author's  
            office, a security assessment usually takes 1-2 days, with the  
            assessed entity receiving a written report on findings within  
            2-3 weeks.




            This bill would authorize OES to direct assessments conducted  
            by the CND-T, and authorize CalTech to "redirect" funds from  
            an assessed agency to pay for the costs of the assessment.



          5)Related legislation. 
          


             a)   AB 1172 (Chau), pending in this Committee, continues in  
               existence the California Cyber Security Task Force, and  
               authorize the task force to act in an advisory capacity and  
               compile policy recommendations on cyber security for the  
               state until January 1, 2020. Also creates a State Director  
               of Cyber Security with within OES.










                                                                     AB 670


                                                                    Page  6






             b)   AB 739 (Irwin), pending in the Assembly Judiciary  
               Committee, requires the Attorney General to create a  
               registry of private entities that intend to engage in  
               communication of cyber security-threat information, and  
               provides that there is no civil or criminal liability for a  
               registered entity based upon its communication of cyber  
               security-threat information to another public or private  
               entity.  


          1)Previous legislation.  


             a)   AB 2200 (Perez) of 2014 would have created a California  
               Cyber Security Steering Committee within OES, and would  
               have continued the existence of the California Cyber  
               Security Task Force until January 1, 2020.  This bill was  
               held at the Assembly Desk.


             b)   SB 1286 (Corbett) of 2014 would have raised from $35  
               million to $65 million the amount that the PUC may devote  
               to research and development projects for the purposes of  
               cyber security and grid integration.  This bill was held in  
               the Senate Rules Committee. 


             c)   AB 1620 (Rodriguez) of 2014 would have established in  
               state government the California Emergency Management and  
               Disaster Preparedness Commission as a statewide  
               executive-level commission to assess and improve the  
               condition of the state's emergency preparedness,  
               management, and disaster recovery capabilities.  This bill  
               was vetoed by Governor Brown.












                                                                     AB 670


                                                                    Page  7






             d)   SB 90 (Budget and Fiscal Review), Chapter 183, Statutes  
               of 2007, created the Office of Information Security and  
               Privacy Protection within the State and Consumer Services  
               Agency.  The duties of the new office include providing  
               direction for information security and privacy to state  
               government agencies, conducting security assessments and  
               review of any state agency, providing educational  
               information to consumers on effective ways of protecting  
               personal information, and assisting in the prosecution of  
               identity theft and other privacy-related crimes.  
          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081