BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        AB 670|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  AB 670
          Author:   Irwin (D)
          Amended:  9/3/15 in Senate
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE:  12-0, 6/29/15
           AYES:  Hall, Berryhill, Block, Gaines, Glazer, Hernandez, Hill,  
            Hueso, Lara, McGuire, Runner, Vidak
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Galgiani

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  6-0, 8/27/15
           AYES:  Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Nielsen

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  79-0, 6/2/15 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Information technology security


          SOURCE:    Author


          DIGEST:  Requires the Office of Information Security (OIS), in  
          consultation with the Office of Emergency Services (OES), to  
          require no fewer than 35 independent security assessments of  
          state entities each year and determine basic standards of  
          services to be performed as part of that assessment.


          Senate Floor amendments of 9/3/15 simplified the components of  
          the independent security assessment and increased the role of  
          the OES.  The amendments also clarified that information  
          collected during the process of conducting an independent  








                                                                     AB 670  
                                                                    Page  2


          security assessment shall remain confidential. 

          ANALYSIS:   


          Existing law:
          
          1)Establishes, within the Government Operations Agency (GOA),  
            the California Department of  Technology (Caltech) under the  
            supervision of the Director of Technology, who is also known  
            as the State Chief Information Officer.  Caltech is generally  
            responsible for the approval and oversight of IT projects by,  
            among other things, consulting with state agencies during  
            initial project planning to ensure that project proposals are  
            based on well-defined programmatic needs.

          2)Establishes, within Caltech, OIS under the supervision of the  
            Chief of the Office of Information Security.  The OIS has the  
            authority to, including, but not limited to, conduct, or  
            require to be conducted, an independent security assessment of  
            any state agency, department, or office the cost of which is  
            to be funded by the state agency, department, or office being  
            assessed.

          3)Requires the cost of an independent security assessment or  
            information security program compliance audit to be funded by  
            the state agency, department or office being assessed or  
            audited. 

          4)Specifies that nothing in the California Public Records Act  
            shall be construed to require the disclosure of an information  
            security record of a public agency, if, on the fact of the  
            particular case, disclosure of that record would reveal  
            vulnerabilities to, or otherwise increase the potential for an  
            attack on an IT system of a public agency.

          5)Creates, within the office of the Governor, the OES which,  
            under the Director of Emergency Services, coordinates disaster  
            response, emergency planning, emergency preparedness, disaster  
            recovery, disaster mitigation, and homeland security  
            activities. 

          This bill:








                                                                     AB 670  
                                                                    Page  3


          1)Specifies that the OIS may conduct, or require to be  
            conducted, an independent security assessment of every state  
            agency, department, or office.  The cost of the assessment  
            shall be funded by the state agency, department, or office  
            being assessed.

          2)Requires the OIS, in consultation with the OES to perform all  
            of the following duties:

             a)   Annually require no fewer than 35 state entities to  
               perform an independent security assessment, the cost of  
               which shall be funded by the state agency, department, or  
               office being assessed.

             b)   Determine criteria and rank state entities based on an  
               information security risk index, as specified.

             c)   Determine the basic standards of services to be  
               performed as part of independent security assessments.

          3)Specifies that the Military Department may perform an  
            independent security assessment of any state agency,  
            department, or office, the cost of which shall be funded by  
            the state agency, department, or office being assessed. 

          4)Requires state agencies and entities that are required to  
            conduct or receive an independent security assessment to  
            transmit the complete results of that assessment and  
            recommendations for mitigating system vulnerabilities if any,  
            to the OIS and the OES.

          5)Specifies that during the process of conducting an independent  
            security assessment, information and records concerning the  
            independent security assessment are confidential and shall not  
            be disclosed, except that the information and records may be  
            transmitted to state employees and state contractors who have  
            been approved as necessary to receive the information and  
            records to perform the assessment.

          6)Specifies that the results of a completed assessment and any  
            related information shall be subject to all disclosure and  
            confidentiality provisions pursuant to any state law including  
            the California Public Records Act.








                                                                     AB 670  
                                                                    Page  4


          7)Requires the OIS to notify the OES, Department of the  
            California Highway Patrol, and the Department of Justice  
            regarding any criminal or alleged criminal cyber activity  
            affecting any state entity or critical infrastructure of state  
            government.

          8)Requires the OIS to report to Caltech and the OES any state  
            entity found to be noncompliant with information security  
            requirements.

          9)Authorizes the OIS to conduct or require to be conducted an  
            audit of information security to ensure program compliance,  
            the cost of which is to be funded by the state agency,  
            department, or office being audited. 

            10) Requires state entities, as defined, rather than certain  
              information security officers, to comply with policies and  
              procedures issued by the OIS.

            11) Limits access to information and records of an ongoing  
              independent security assessment and would make findings to  
              demonstrate the interest protected by the limitation and the  
              need for protecting that interest.  
                            
          Background

          Purpose of the bill.  According to the author, "cybersecurity  
          attacks are on the rise and California state government is a  
          priority target because of the value and sheer size of its  
          networks and data.  The state bears a responsibility in actively  
          defending the information it collects as well as the critical  
          networks that Californians rely on for services.  The State  
          Administrative Manual currently includes the provisions  
          contained in this bill, but there is no mechanism of enforcement  
          and compliance is lacking.  These preventative assessments are a  
          vital tool in combating the increasingly sophisticated  
          cyber-attacks that threaten our economy and public safety."

          CalTech/OIS.  CalTech is the central IT organization for the  
          State of California and is responsible for the approval and  
          oversight of all state IT projects.  Among its various offices  
          is the California Information Security Office, or OIS.

          OIS is the primary state government authority for ensuring the  







                                                                     AB 670  
                                                                    Page  5


          confidentiality, integrity, and availability of state systems  
          and applications, and ensuring the protection of state  
          information.  The OIS represents California to federal, state,  
          and local government entities, higher education, private  
          industry, and others on security-related matters.  According to  
          the author's office, there are a total of 384 state entities  
          subject to the OIS (which excludes some constitutional offices).  
           It is not known how many attacks, whether successful or  
          unsuccessful, have been made against state agency computers over  
          the past year. 

          Under current law, OIS is authorized to conduct independent  
          security assessments of any state agency, department or office,  
          but is not required to do so.  Existing state policy found in  
          the State Administrative Manual indicates that each state agency  
          shall conduct a comprehensive IT risk assessment once every two  
          years.  It is not known how many security assessments were  
          conducted by OIS in the past year.  

          Cyber Threats in California. According to the California  
          Military Department (CMD), California's size and importance  
          makes it vulnerable to cyber incidents that disrupt business,  
          shutdown critical infrastructure, and compromise intellectual  
          property or national security.  

          CMD calls cybercrime "a growth industry" causing $400 billion in  
          negative impacts annually on the global economy.  Thirty percent  
          of all cyber-attacks and other malicious activity are targeted  
          at the government, making these networks and systems the most  
          vulnerable target of cybercrime.  

          According to CMD, the threat to government networks has never  
          been higher.  "Hacktivists", nation states, cyber criminals and  
          other threat groups are attacking government networks to steal  
          sensitive information and make a political/economic statement. 

          Prior/Related Legislation
          
          AB 1172 (Chau, 2015) creates a California Cyber Security Task  
          Force within OES to act in an advisory capacity  and make policy  
          recommendations on cyber security for the State of California.    
          (Pending on the Senate Floor)

          AB 739 (Irwin, 2015) provides legal immunity for civil or  







                                                                     AB 670  
                                                                    Page  6


          criminal liability for private entities that communicate  
          anonymized cyber security threat information and meet specified  
          requirements, until January 1, 2020.  (Held in Assembly  
          Judiciary Committee) 

          AB 2200 (Perez, 2014) would have created a 13 member California  
          Cyber Security Steering Committee in OES and continue the  
          existence of the California Cyber Security Task Force until  
          January 1, 2020.  (Held at the Assembly Desk)

          AB 1620 (Rodriguez, 2014) would have established the California  
          Emergency Management and Disaster Preparedness Commission as a  
          statewide executive-level commission to assess and improve the  
          condition of the State's emergency preparedness, management, and  
          disaster recovery capabilities.  (Vetoed by Governor Brown)

          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, CalTech would  
          incur costs of approximately $2 million in 2016-17, and ongoing  
          costs of approximately $1.9 million for 12 PY of staff to  
          conduct security assessments.  Staff estimates that OIS would  
          have additional costs in the hundreds of thousands annually for  
          travel and other associated charges. (Technology Services  
          Revolving Fund)

          Further, ongoing, potentially significant cost pressures for  
          state entities to make necessary IT improvements to address  
          vulnerabilities identified through security assessments.   
          However, these improvements would decrease the likelihood that  
          agencies would experience a future data breach, thereby avoiding  
          related costs in future years.  (General Fund and/or Special  
          Funds)

          Finally, an estimated Caltech costs in the range of $100,000 to  
          $150,000 to develop and adopt standards for the OIS, Military  
          Department, or entity conducting a security assessment to follow  
          when conducting those assessments and reporting results.  These  
          costs include necessary updates to the State Administrative  
          Manual. (Technology Services Revolving Fund)


          SUPPORT:   (Verified9/4/15)







                                                                     AB 670  
                                                                    Page  7




          Risk Management Society


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified9/4/15)




          None received




          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:     According to the Risk Management  
          Society, "this legislation is a prime example of proactive risk  
          management for a risk, cyber terrorism that is quickly becoming  
          a serious threat for many organizations, including state  
          agencies.  We believe it is critical that all organizations,  
          including state agencies, assess their cyber security measures  
          in order to mitigate the risk to those who utilize their  
          services.

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  79-0, 6/2/15
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang,  
            Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd,  
            Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia,  
            Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray,  
            Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones,  
            Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low,  
            Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin,  
            Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea,  
            Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago,  
            Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber,  
            Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Chávez

          Prepared by:Felipe Lopez / G.O. / (916) 651-1530
          9/4/15 14:17:00


                                   ****  END  ****







                                                                     AB 670  
                                                                    Page  8