BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Session AB 681 (Ting) - State Board of Equalization: surveys: assessment procedures and practices: county assessor. ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Version: July 15, 2015 |Policy Vote: GOV. & F. 7 - 0 | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Urgency: No |Mandate: No | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Hearing Date: August 17, 2015 |Consultant: Robert Ingenito | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. Bill Summary: AB 681 would make specified modifications to the Board of Equalization's (BOE's) county assessment practices survey cycle. Fiscal Impact: BOE indicates that it would require additional staff to complete the proposed surveys and samples within one year, as the bill requires. These costs are estimated to be $629,000 in 2016-17 and $571,000 annually thereafter (General Fund). The bill would not impact property tax revenues. AB 681 (Ting) Page 1 of ? Background: In 1850, the Legislature first directed county assessors to tax property; however, assessors in different counties often applied different tax rates and methodologies. Inconsistencies were especially acute between counties dominated by mining and agriculture. In 1879, BOE was created to equalize rates and assessment practices among counties. Additionally, the Board enacts rules and regulations which generally bind county assessors. As part of its oversight role, BOE surveys each county assessor to assess that county's practices, procedures, and general performance. The results of BOE's survey are published into public documents known as "Assessment Practices Surveys." BOE's survey must include a review with respect to the uniformity of treatment of all classes of property to ensure that no class receives a systematic overvaluation or undervaluation. Additionally, BOE's survey may include a statistical sampling from a county's assessment rolls to determine adequate representation of the several classes of property within the county. Specifically, BOE staff draws a sample of representative parcels, assesses the property on its own, and then compares its value to the assessor's. BOE staff, during the course of a survey, can access and make copies of any of the assessor's records, or audit any book or record provided by a taxpayer. Assessors have a right to appeal BOE appraisals within his or her county where differences haven't been resolved before a field review. Current law directs BOE to complete survey reports as rapidly as possible, but requires surveys of all counties every five years. BOE must sample assessments from the ten largest counties or cities and counties in the State each year plus three other counties selected at random, determined by level of assessed value of property. BOE must sample assessments from a county if it finds that it has significant problems as a result of the last survey instead of a large county selected at random. BOE sends the survey report to the assessor once complete, setting forth specific findings and recommendations; however, before preparing the survey report, BOE must meet with the assessor to discuss matters included therein. After receiving AB 681 (Ting) Page 2 of ? the survey report, the assessor may file a written response with BOE within 30 days, unless the BOE extends the period for good cause, which is included in the final survey report. The survey report, the assessor's response, and any additional BOE notes constitute the final report, which must be completed within two years after BOE begins the survey. After the survey is complete, BOE is required to prepare a written survey report setting forth its findings and recommendations. Before preparing its written survey report, the law requires the BOE to meet with the assessor to discuss and confer on those matters that may be included in the written survey report. Existing law requires the BOE to issue the final survey report within two years after the date the BOE begins the survey. Current law does not require BOE to meet with the former county assessor if the survey reviews the former assessor's administration. In addition, it does not provide a process for the former assessor to formally respond to a BOE survey. Proposed Law: This bill would make several changes to BOE's survey process. First, it would require the Board, for surveys started on or after July 1, 2017, to issue a final survey report within 12 months after the date the survey was begun. The bill would permit a gradual transition from 24 months down to 12 months, as specified. Second, the bill would make specified modifications to the survey cycle to reduce the number of surveys that BOE is required to conduct. Finally, the bill would (1) require BOE to notify and meet with the former assessor whose administration is being reviewed upon request, prior to publishing its written survey report, and (2) allow the former assessor to prepare a written response to the BOE report that must be published as an addendum to the final survey report. Related Legislation: AB 2234 (Ting) would have made similar changes to survey requirements applicable to BOE in determining the AB 681 (Ting) Page 3 of ? adequacy of the procedures and practices by used by county assessors. The bill was held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee's Suspense File. Staff Comments: Without modifying the survey schedule, publishing written surveys within one year would not be possible. The bill would ultimately shorten the time to complete the written survey report from two years to one year. To mitigate this impact, the bill would reduce the number of county surveys that BOE must complete over a 5-year cycle, from 58 to 30. The bill reduces the number of county samplings the BOE must undertake as well. To complete the surveys in the allotted time using existing staff resources would require the BOE to curtail each audit's scope and depth. Thus, additional staff would be needed to meet the compressed schedule and maintain the audit's scope. BOE notes that hiring and retaining qualified staff could be difficult, as the state's compensation package for individuals with the proper skill set has lagged behind those offered at the county level. -- END --