BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 689 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 15, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE Henry T. Perea, Chair AB 689 (Dodd) - As Introduced February 25, 2015 SUBJECT: Marketing of eggs: violations: civil actions: civil penalties. SUMMARY: This bill increases the fine for a violation of shell egg marketing regulations (SEMR) from a maximum of $1,000 to a maximum of $10,000 and authorizes county agricultural commissioners, in lieu of prosecution, to levy civil penalties for a violation of SEMR. Specifically, this bill: 1)Increases the fine for a violation of SEMR from a maximum of $1,000 to a maximum of $10,000. 2)Requires notification to the person charged with a SEMR violation that includes the following information: nature of the violation, amount of proposed penalty, the right to request an appeal hearing and right to judicial review of a decision within 30 days of the decision. 3)Requires the Secretary (Secretary) of the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to send a copy of the notice of proposed action to the County Agricultural Commissioner (CAC) where the violation took place. 4)Requires the Secretary to inform CAC, as specified, of the AB 689 Page 2 violation for which a penalty has been assessed. 5)Allows CAC to bring civil action against a person who violates SEMR within the CAC's county. 6)Requires any funds recovered by CAC, due to civil action against a person who violates SEMR within the CAC's county, to be deposited in the CAC's county's General Fund (GF). 7)Defines person, for the purpose of SEMR violations, as anyone engaging in the business of preparing or selling of shelled eggs for market, as specified. a) Requires, before a civil penalty is imposed, notification to the person charged with a SEMR violation that includes the nature of the violation and amount of proposed penalty; b) Requires the person charged to have the right to request a hearing within 20 days of receiving notification; c) Requires, if a hearing is requested, notification to the person charged the time and place of the hearing at least 10 days before the hearing; d) Requires at the hearing that the person charged be allowed to review CAC's evidence and present evidence on their own behalf; and, e) Allows CAC to take proposed action without a hearing, if one is not requested. 8)Requires CAC to send a copy of the proposed action to the Secretary, at the same time notice is sent to the person charged. 9)Allows a person, who CAC levies civil penalties against, to appeal the decision to the Secretary, if the person had requested and appeared at a hearing. 10)Requires the following procedures to apply to the appeal: AB 689 Page 3 a) Requires the appeal to be in writing and signed by the person or their agent, listing the grounds for appeal and a copy of the CAC decision. Requires copy a to be sent to CAC; b) Allows the person and CAC to present a record of the hearing and a written argument to the Secretary stating grounds for upholding, changing or repealing the CAC's decision; c) Allows the Secretary to allow oral arguments when written arguments are filed. i) Requires at least 10 days' notice of time and place, if oral arguments are granted; and, ii) Allows times to be changed if agreed upon by the person, CAC and the Secretary. d) Requires the Secretary to make a written decision within 45 day of the date of the appeal or as specified; e) Allows that the Secretary's decision could uphold, modify, reduce or repeal the CAC's action, as specified. Requires both the person and CAC to receive a copy of the Secretary's decision; f) Disallows a person who does request a hearing with CAC to file for an appeal with the Secretary; and, g) Allows the person to request a review of the Secretary's decision within 30 days of the decision, as specified. 11)Allows CAC to file a certified copy of a final decision with the court that directs the payment of a civil penalty pursuant to violations of SEMR, as specified. 12)Requires funds from civil penalties levied by CAC to be placed in the CAC's county GF, to be used by the CAC to carry out the CAC's duties. Requires CAC to inform the Secretary of the violation for AB 689 Page 4 which a penalty has been assessed. 13)Provides for procedures to receive payment for civil penalties and court remedies if payments are not made, as specified. 14)Requires, that when an administrative hearing is requested, a final decision and order within 60 days of the conclusion of the hearing and that the order be mailed to the person and any penalties imposed are due within 45 days of the postmark on the order. EXISTING LAW: 1)Regulates the marketing of shell eggs, and requires egg producers and egg handlers to register with the Secretary of CDFA. 2)Provides for violations of SEMR, punishable as a misdemeanor. 3)Allows the Secretary, in lieu of seeking prosecution for SEMR violations, to bring a civil action for up to $1,000 for each violation. 4)Allows a district attorney in a county were a violation takes place to prosecute SEMR violations. AB 689 Page 5 FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. This bill has been keyed fiscal by Legislative Counsel. COMMENTS: In order to ensure fair business practices and informed consumers, California has enacted a series of civil and criminal laws and regulations concerning the marketing of shell eggs. Shell eggs are in-shell eggs which have not been pasteurized. California strictly regulates the quality of egg products for sale and the manner in which they are advertised so that consumers can be safe and informed. Among these are regulations concerning misleading advertising regarding the grading of the eggs; under what conditions the egg-laying hens lived; the proper storage, handling, and refrigeration of the eggs; and even if the eggs are chicken eggs at all. According to supporters, SEMR requirements are vital, not only for promoting fair business and informed consumption, but for protecting the health of Californians. According to the author, violations of SEMR are under-enforced. District attorneys are unlikely to use limited resources to prosecute a commercial/agricultural issue that brings little return to the county due to caps on penalties. While the Secretary of CDFA can pursue civil penalties, using a statewide office to pursue local violations also may not be the best use of limited resources. By allowing CAC to levy civil penalties for SEMR violations, this bill puts the local officials with in-depth knowledge of agricultural issues and regulations in a position to act quickly. Furthermore, the author states the combination of quicker local action and increased fines will help ensure greater compliance with AB 689 Page 6 existing SEMR. This bill includes a standard appeals process. Parties who believe they have been mistakenly fined by CACs can petition either for a reduction in the fine or a total overturn. The appeals process is mediated by the Secretary of CDFA. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support Association of California Egg Farmers (Sponsor) Pacific Egg and Poultry (Sponsor) Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by:Victor Francovich / AGRI. / (916) 319-2084 AB 689 Page 7