BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 707|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 707
Author: Wood (D)
Amended: 8/24/15 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 6/17/15
AYES: Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Moorlach,
Pavley
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 74-0, 5/22/15 (Consent) - See last page for
vote
SUBJECT: Agricultural land: Williamson Act contracts:
cancellationAgricultural land: Williamson Act
contracts: cancellation.
SOURCE: County of Humboldt
DIGEST: This bill establishes a process for cities and counties
to provide comments on some Williamson Act cancellation
valuations negotiated by the Department of Conservation (DOC).
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/24/15 establish this comment
process, instead of prohibiting the DOC and landowner from
agreeing on a cancellation value in some counties.
ANALYSIS:
AB 707
Page 2
Existing law:
1)Creates the Williamson Act, also known as the California Land
Conservation Act of 1965, which authorizes cities and counties
to enter into agricultural land preservation contracts with
landowners who agree to restrict the use of their land for a
minimum of 10 years in exchange for lower assessed valuations
for property tax purposes. The Division of Land Resource
Protection in the DOC administers the Williamson Act.
2)Provides for a 12.5% cancellation fee, based on the value of
the land, for canceling a Williamson Act contract, as
specified.
3)Allows DOC and the landowner to agree on a cancellation
valuation of the land.
4)Allows a city or county to pass an ordinance that requires an
additional cancellation fee that goes to the local
jurisdiction.
This bill:
1)Requires DOC to notify the county assessor and applicable city
council or board of supervisors 60 days before DOC plans to
cancel a Williamson Act contract in a city or county that has
imposed an additional local cancellation fee. At that time,
DOC must provide a preliminary cancellation valuation and a
rationale for the selection of that valuation.
2)Allows the county assessor and city council or board of
supervisors to provide comments to DOC on the valuation.
AB 707
Page 3
3)Requires DOC to consider those comments before determining the
final cancellation valuation of the land.
Background
The California Land Conservation Act of 1965, also known as the
Williamson Act, is a program administered by DOC to conserve
agricultural and open space land. The Williamson Act allows
private property owners to sign voluntary contracts with
counties and cities that restrict their land to agriculture,
open space, and compatible uses for the next 10 years.
Williamson Act contracts automatically renew each year, so that
the term is always 10 years in the future. In return for these
voluntary contracts, county assessors lower the value of
Williamson Act contracted lands to reflect the value of their
use as agriculture, or open space instead of their market value
under Proposition 13. Historically, the state made subvention
payments to counties in order to make up for a portion of the
resulting losses in local property tax revenue. These payments
totaled about $35 million to $40 million each year from 1994 to
2008. However, the state stopped making subvention payments in
Fiscal Year 2009-10 in response to budgetary pressures.
A landowner wants to develop land restricted by a Williamson Act
contract has two options. The normal way to end a Williamson
Act contract is for either the landowner or local officials to
give "notice of nonrenewal," which stops the automatic annual
renewals and allows the contract to run down over the next 10
years. Alternatively, local officials can cancel a contract at
the request of the landowner. To do so, local officials must
make findings that cancellation is in the public interest and
that cancellation is consistent with the purposes of the
Williamson Act. In addition, the landowner must pay a
cancellation fee that is equal to 12.5% of the "cancellation
valuation" of the property. Typically, the county assessor
determines the cancellation valuation, which is set at the
property's unrestricted market value. However, a landowner and
DOC can separately agree on a cancellation valuation for the
AB 707
Page 4
land, which takes the place of the value identified by the
county assessor. According to DOC, this process has only been
used once: in 2012 for a property in Humboldt County. Local
officials may approve or deny a cancellation once the
cancellation value is determined.
Revenues from this cancellation fee are remitted to the state.
However, the Williamson Act also allows local jurisdictions to
levy their own cancellation fees in addition to the state
cancellation fee. The local government retains revenues from
the local cancellation fee. So, some local jurisdictions
established fees in response to the loss of subvention payments
in 2009-10. Merced County and Humboldt County are the only
counties to have local cancellation fees, in addition to the
state cancellation fee. Humboldt's local cancellation fee is
12.5% of the cancellation value of the land. Since the
cancellation value of the land can affect how much revenue the
city or county receives from their own cancellation fees, some
counties want greater say over determining the cancellation
value than is afforded by the current process.
Comments
Purpose of the bill. AB 707 enhances local control by ensuring
that local governments that have established their own
Williamson Act cancellation fees have the opportunity to weigh
in on decisions that affect their communities and revenues.
Local governments have specific knowledge about the value of the
land under contract, the circumstances on the ground, and other
factors that should be considered when setting the cancellation
valuation of the land. However, current law can leave counties
out of this discussion. For example, in 2011, DOC agreed on a
cancellation valuation significantly below the County Assessor's
determined fair market value for a property in Humboldt County,
resulting in a significantly lower cancellation fee than would
have otherwise occurred. Significantly reducing the
cancellation fee undermines the financial disincentive to
terminate Williamson Act contracts and undermines the goal of
preserving open space. AB 707 remedies this defect in current
AB 707
Page 5
law by requiring DOC to consult with counties prior to
determining a final cancellation valuation for the land.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.:YesLocal: No
SUPPORT: (Verified8/25/15)
County of Humboldt (source)
California State Association of Counties
Rural County Representatives of California
OPPOSITION: (Verified8/25/15)
None received
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 74-0, 5/22/15
AYES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla,
Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau,
Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly,
Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina
Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez,
Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden,
Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low,
Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin,
Nazarian, Obernolte, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon,
Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark
Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, Jones, O'Donnell, Olsen, Waldron,
Weber
Prepared by:Anton Favorini-Csorba / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119
8/26/15 12:23:12
**** END ****
AB 707
Page 6