BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 708 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 20, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair AB 708 (Jones-Sawyer) - As Amended April 30, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Business and Professions |Vote:|8 - 6 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill would require the manufacturer of a designated consumer product manufactured after January 1, 2017, for retail sale in California, to disclose the ingredients contained in the AB 708 Page 2 product on the product label, and post the product ingredient information and information about any potential health impacts on the manufacturer's website, as specified. FISCAL EFFECT: Annual costs to the Department of Toxics and Substance Control (DTSC) of approximately $500,000 to $800,000 to enforce the provisions of this bill. Although the bill does not require DTSC to enforce its provisions, DTSC assumes it is required to enforce the bill because of the Health and Safety Code in which the bill is placed, which includes enforcement authority for DTSC. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, "Cleaning product manufacturers through advertisements encourage consumers and business owners to keep their homes and workplaces clean and fresh using their products. But what isn't well known is that our culture for cleaning leads to frequent and repeated exposure to toxic chemicals that may harm Californians. However, unlike food, cosmetics, and drugs, most cleaning product manufacturers are not required to disclose ingredients. Absent any state mandate for ingredient disclosure, consumers are left in the dark when it comes to purchasing cleaning products they feel are safe for them, their families, or their workers." This bill specifically targets "cleaning products," including commercial and consumer-household products, which are not required to disclose product ingredients under current disclosure laws, unlike personal care products and food. AB 708 Page 3 2)Background. A 2011 study, Dirty Secrets: What's Hiding in Your Cleaning Products?, commissioned by Women's Voices for the Earth, conducted an independent laboratory review of many household cleaning products and reported that some of the ingredients in common household products contain reproductive toxins and allergens, yet none of those chemicals were listed on the product's ingredient label. Further, the Environmental Working Group created a "Guide to Healthy Cleaning," which reviewed the chemical ingredients of many cleaning products, and noted, "its researchers discovered that it took hard work to find out what potentially toxic chemicals were in them. Unlike manufacturers of cosmetics and personal care products, companies that make cleaning products are not required to list the ingredients they put in their formulations on the package, bottle or box?just seven percent of cleaning products adequately disclosed their contents." AB 1879 (Feuer and Huffman), Chapter 559, Statutes of 2008, established the "Green Chemistry" Law. In an effort to provide better awareness about the ingredients in household products, the law authorizes and requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to adopt regulations to establish a process to identify and prioritize chemicals in consumer products, and to establish a process for evaluating chemicals of concern in consumer products and their potential alternatives. The objective of Green Chemistry is to evaluate certain chemicals within consumer products that are known to be of concern, and for DTSC to provide input and make recommendations for safer alternatives. The Green Chemistry program does not mandate or specify labeling requirements for consumer products. This bill does not require or recommend AB 708 Page 4 that manufacturers use alternative products, but instead disclose the ingredients of the products on the product label and on the manufacturer's website. 3)Prior Related Legislation. SB 928 (Simitian) of 2010, would have required manufacturers to disclosure the chemical content of specified types of cleaning products sold in California. This bill was held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee's Suspense File. Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081