BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                       AB 721


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          721 (Medina)


          As Amended  May 28, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                |Noes                  |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------|
          |Higher          |12-0  |Medina, Baker,      |                      |
          |Education       |      |Bloom, Harper,      |                      |
          |                |      |Irwin,              |                      |
          |                |      |Jones-Sawyer,       |                      |
          |                |      |Levine, Linder,     |                      |
          |                |      |Low, Santiago,      |                      |
          |                |      |Weber, Williams     |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0  |Gomez, Bigelow,     |                      |
          |                |      |Bonta, Calderon,    |                      |
          |                |      |Chang, Daly,        |                      |
          |                |      |Eggman, Gallagher,  |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |Eduardo Garcia,     |                      |
          |                |      |Gordon, Holden,     |                      |
          |                |      |Jones, Quirk,       |                      |
          |                |      |Rendon, Wagner,     |                      |
          |                |      |Weber, Wood         |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |








                                                                       AB 721


                                                                      Page  2





          |                |      |                    |                      |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Establishes requirements on institutions related to  
          disclosure of student loan data and disclosure of information to  
          students seeking private loans.  Specifically, this bill:  


          1)Requires public, private or independent colleges, except  
            California Community Colleges (CCC), to provide average graduate  
            loan debt information publically, on the institution's Internet  
            Web site.


          2)Requires public, private and independent institutions, prior to  
            processing a private student loan, to provide the student  
            information concerning all unused federal student loan moneys  
            available to that student.


          3)Requires an institution that does not participate in federal  
            student loan programs to inform the student of such and that the  
            student may be eligible for federal loans at a participating  
            institution.  The institution is required to provide the student  
            with information regarding the Cal Grants and Federal Student  
            Aid websites.


          EXISTING LAW requires public, private and independent  
          postsecondary educational institutions, except the CCC, to state  
          in printed and online financial aid materials and with private  
          loan applications specified information related to federal student  
          loans and private loans.  


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee: 









                                                                       AB 721


                                                                      Page  3






          1)Negligible fiscal impact to the University of California (UC)  
            and the California State University (CSU), as both segments  
            already comply with the reporting requirements of this bill.  


          2)Minor absorbable costs for CCC districts to provide the required  
            information to students when certifying private student loans;  
            currently 22 CCC districts, involving 29 campuses, certify about  
            700 students for private loans.  


          COMMENTS:  Average graduate loan debt data.  This bill would  
          require public, private, independent postsecondary education  
          institutions, except CCCs, to disclose average debt of graduates  
          by degree level.  California's public and most nonprofit, private  
          four-year institutions disclose this data currently to one or more  
          of several organizations (United States News & World Report,  
          Peterson's and College Board) that conducts annual surveys of  
          colleges that include questions about student loan debt.  To make  
          the annual surveys easier for colleges, the organizations use  
          questions from a shared survey instrument called the Common Data  
          Set (CDS).  The Institute for College Access and Success (TICAS),  
          in creating the annual Project on Student Debt, licenses and uses  
          the data from one of the surveying organizations.  According to  
          TICAS, one limitation of the CDS is that very few for-profit  
          colleges report debt data through CDS and national data show that  
          borrowing levels at for-profit colleges are, on average, higher  
          than borrowing at other types of colleges. The data disclosure  
          requirements of this bill are based on the CDS.


          Other loan reporting requirements.  In addition to CDS, there are  
          two other notable formats in which institutions report student  
          loan information.  The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data  
          System (IPEDS) is required for all institutions and includes  
          annual, but not cumulative, student loan debt information.   
          Federal "gainful employment" (GE) rules will require most  
          for-profit programs, and certificate programs at non-profit and  








                                                                       AB 721


                                                                      Page  4





          public institutions, to provide program-level median graduate loan  
          debt data.  The GE rules are scheduled to take effect July 1,  
          2015; pending the outcome of ongoing industry litigation.  Some  
          for-profit institutions have expressed concern about the reporting  
          requirements contained in this bill, arguing that these  
          requirements are duplicative/conflicting with GE reporting  
          requirements.  According to the author, in order for a student to  
          compare loan debt data across higher education institutions, all  
          institutions must disclose the same data.  This bill follows the  
          CDS average graduate loan debt for several reasons, including that  
          this formula is based on the cost of a student to start and  
          complete at the institution (whereas GE median graduate debt  
          figures may be affected by outliers of students who transfer in a  
          significant number of educational credits) and that most  
          California institutions are already voluntarily reporting this  
          data, thereby reducing the cost of compliance with the  
          requirements of this bill.  


          Private loans vs. federal loans.  Private loans typically have  
          variable interest rates and are not eligible for deferment,  
          income-based repayment, or loan forgiveness that is available with  
          federal loans.  Private student loans are also much harder than  
          other forms of consumer debt to discharge in bankruptcy court.   
          Generally, private loans are recommended as a last resort for  
          students.  Data shows, however, that many students who obtain  
          private loans have unused federal loan moneys available.   
          According to TICAS, in 2011-12, 47% of private loan borrowers  
          borrowed less than they could have under the federal Stafford loan  
          program.  This bill would require institutions to notify students,  
          prior to certifying a private student loan, of the student's  
          eligibility for federal student loan moneys, and, if the  
          institution does not participate in federal loans, to notify  
          students that the student may be eligible for federal loans at a  
          participating institution.  The institution would be required to  
          provide the student with information regarding the Cal Grants and  
          Federal Student Aid Web sites.










                                                                       AB 721


                                                                      Page  5







          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
                          Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960  FN:  
          0000689