BILL ANALYSIS Ó
AB 722
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 20, 2015
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCE
Matthew Dababneh, Chair
AB 722
(Perea) - As Introduced February 25, 2015
SUBJECT: Securities transactions: qualifications by permit:
liability
SUMMARY: Creates a new qualification by permit under
California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968. Specifically,
this bill:
1)Provides that any offer or sale of any security that meets the
following criteria may be qualified by permit:
a) An applicant may file an application for a
"crowdfunding" permit if it meets the following conditions:
i) The applicant is a California corporation or a
foreign corporation, as specified; the applicant is not
issuing fractional undivided interests in oil and gas
rights, or a similar interest in other mineral rights;
the applicant is not an investment company subject to the
Investment Company Act of 1940; and the applicant is not
subject to the reporting requirements of as specified in
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
AB 722
Page 2
ii) Provides that the total offering of securities by
the applicant to be sold in a 12-month period, within or
outside this state, is limited to $1,000,000, less the
aggregate offering price for all securities sold within
the 12 months before the start, and during the offering
of the securities.
iii) Offers and sales cannot be integrated with prior
offers or sales of securities or subsequent offers or
sale of securities, as specified.
iv) Prohibits the securities sold during a 12-month
period to any investor from exceeding the lesser of
$5,000 or 10% of the net worth of that natural person or
such amount as the commissioner of the Department of
Business Oversight (DBO) may provide by rule or order.
(1) States "net worth" shall be determined
exclusive of home, home furnishings, and automobiles.
Other assets includes in the computation of net worth
may be valued at the fair market value.
v) Requires the issuer to take reasonable steps to
ensure that each investor who is a natural person who is
not an accredited investor has knowledge and experience
in financial business matters that he or she is capable
of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective
investment.
vi) Requires the issuer to file with the commissioner
and provide to investors a Small Company Offering
Registration (SCOR) disclosure document on Form U-7,
prior to the commencement of the offering of securities.
AB 722
Page 3
vii) Requires the issuer to set aside in a separate
third-party escrow account all funds raised as part of
the offering to be held in escrow until that time of
minimum offering amount is reached. The issuer shall
return all funds if the minimum offering amount is not
reached within one year.
viii) Prohibits an issuer from conducting unsolicited
telephone calls.
ix) Prohibits an issuer and others as specified from
being disqualified as a "bad actor" under federal
regulations.
x) Any other requirement set forth by rule adopted by
the commissioner of DBO.
b) Provides that if the commissioner does not issue a stop
order then the qualification of the sale of the securities
become effective at noon of the 60th day after the filing
of the application.
2)Imposes a filing fee of $200 plus 1/5th of 2% of the aggregate
value of the securities sought to be sold in California for
qualification of the sale of securities by permit.
3)Allows an issuer to offer securities once an application has
been filed with the commissioner of DBO but has not yet become
approved.
AB 722
Page 4
4)Requires the court to award reasonable attorney's fees and
costs, and authorizes the award of treble and punitive
damages, to a prevailing purchaser in an action brought
against any person who violates conditions of qualification by
permit.
5)Provides that a plaintiff is not required to plead or prove
that the defendant acted with scienter.
EXISTING FEDERAL LAW:
1)Provide for the Securities Act of 1933, which establishes a
framework for regulating the offer and sale of securities and
ensuring the protection of investors that purchase those
securities. Generally speaking, the Securities Act of 1933
requires the offer or sale of all securities to be registered with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and to be structured
as prescribed in federal law and regulation, unless the offer or
sale is covered by an exemption. This federal act also require
those who offer (i.e., market) and sell securities to be licensed
as investment advisers or broker-dealers, unless either the
transaction or the activity being undertaken is exempt.
2)Provides for Regulation D, one of the regulations promulgated by
the SEC to implement the Securities Act of 1933. Regulation D
authorizes a series of exemptions from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and includes eight
rules, denoted Rules 501 through 508, which are codified as 17 CFR
230.501 through 230.508.
a) Rule 501 of Regulation D defines accredited investors as,
among other things, financial institutions, securities
broker-dealers, large pension plans, corporate entities with
assets in excess of $5 million, and other large, financially
sophisticated entities. An accredited investor also includes:
AB 722
Page 5
i) Any natural person whose individual net worth, or joint
net worth with that person's spouse, exceeds $1 million at
the time of their purchase of securities, exclusive of their
primary residence; or,
ii) Any natural person with an individual income in excess
of $200,000 in each of the two most recent years, or joint
income with that person's spouse in excess of $300,000 in
each of those years, together with a reasonable expectation
of reaching the same income level in the current year.
b) Rule 504 of Regulation D authorizes the offer and sale of up
to $1 million in securities by an issuer, as long as the offer
and sale are made:
i) Exclusively in one or more states that provide for the
registration of the securities, and require the public filing
and delivery to investors of a substantive disclosure
document before the sale of the securities (this is the
provision of Rule 504 applicable to this bill);
(1) In one or more states that have no provision for
the registration of the securities or the public filing or
delivery of a disclosure document before sale, if the
securities have been registered in at least one state that
does provide for such registration, public filing and
delivery before sale, as specified; or,
(2) Exclusively according to state law exemptions from
registration that permit general solicitation and general
advertising, as long as sales are made only to accredited
investors (this is the provision of Rule 504 that was
applicable to prior bills sponsored by this bill's
sponsor).
3)Pursuant to the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act (Public
Law 112-106), authorizes the use of general solicitation and
general advertising in certain circumstances not previously
AB 722
Page 6
authorized. Title II of the JOBS Act, operative September 23,
2013, lifted the restriction against use of general solicitation
and general advertising, when sales are made only to accredited
investors and other requirements are met. Title III of the JOBS
Act, otherwise known as the CROWDFUND Act, will lift the
restriction against use of general solicitation and general
advertising to both accredited and non-accredited investors, once
the SEC promulgates final regulations implementing that title.
EXISTING STATE LAW:
1)Provides that it is unlawful for any person to offer or sell
any security in this state, unless such offering or sale has
been qualified by the commissioner, as specified, or unless
the offering or sale is covered by an express exemption
(Corporations Code Section 25110).
2)Authorizes the qualification by notification of any security
issued by a person that is the issuer of a security registered
under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
issued by an investment company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (Section 25112).
a) Requires an application for qualification by
notification to contain the maximum amount of securities
proposed to be offered in California; consent to service of
process; information about any adverse order, judgment, or
decree entered in connection with the offering by another
state regulator, the SEC, or a court (if applicable); and
any additional information required by rule of the
commissioner.
b) Provides that if no stop order or other order postponing
or suspending the effectiveness of any qualification is in
effect, qualification of the sale of the securities
automatically becomes effective, and the securities may be
offered and sold in accordance with the application, on the
10th business day after the application is filed or last
AB 722
Page 7
amended, or at an earlier time specified by the
commissioner.
3)Establishes "qualification by permit" which states all
securities, whether or not eligible for qualification by
coordination under Section 25111 or qualification by
notification under Section 25112, may be qualified by permit
under this section. An application for a permit under this
section shall contain any information and be accompanied by
any documents as shall be required by rule of the
commissioner, in addition to the information specified in
Section 25160 and the consent to service of process required
by Section 25165. For this purpose, the commissioner may
classify issuers and types of securities. [Corporations Code,
Section 25113]
4)Contains several exemptions from the requirement immediately
above. While the number of exemptions is too numerous to
list, two of the most relevant exemptions for purposes of this
bill include Corporations Code Sections 25102(f) and 25102(n).
a) 25102(f) provides an exemption for any offer or sale of
any security in a transaction that meets all of the
following criteria: i) sales of the security are made to
an unlimited number of accredited investors and up to 35
other persons, who are not accredited investors; ii) all
purchasers either have a pre-existing personal or business
relationship with the offeror, or can reasonably be assumed
to have the capacity to protect their own interests in
connection with the transaction, by reason of their
business or financial experience, or the business or
financial experience of their professional advisers; iii)
each purchaser represents that he or she is purchasing for
his or her own account, and not with a view to or for sale
in connection with any distribution of the security; and
iv) the offer and sale of the security is not accomplished
through the publication of any advertisement.
According to the Department of Business Oversight (DBO),
AB 722
Page 8
between 20,000 and 35,000 people file forms with DBO
annually, claiming exemptions pursuant to Section 25102(f).
In 2013, approximately 18,000 exemption filings were made
in connection with securities offerings of $1 million or
less.
b) 25102(n) provides an exemption for any offer or sale of
any security in a transaction that meets all of the
following criteria: i) the issuer is not a blind pool
issuer, as that term is defined by the commissioner; ii)
sales of securities are made only to qualified purchasers
or other persons the issuer reasonably believes to be
qualified purchasers; iii) each purchaser represents that
he or she is purchasing for his or her own account, and not
with a view to or for sale in connection with any
distribution of the security; iv) each natural person
purchaser is provided with a disclosure statement that
meets the disclosure requirements of federal Regulation D,
at least five business days before they purchase or commit
to purchase the security; v) the offer and sale of the
security is made by way of a general announcement, whose
content is strictly limited; and vi) telephone solicitation
by the issuer is not permitted, until and unless the issuer
determines that the prospective purchaser being solicited
is a qualified purchaser.
Qualified purchasers are those who meet one or more of
several criteria listed in subdivision (n). Generally
speaking, these criteria describe persons with some degree
of financial sophistication, though the qualified purchaser
bar is lower than the accredited investor bar. As an
example, an individual is a qualified purchaser if that
person individually, or jointly with their spouse, has a
minimum net worth of $250,000 and had, during the
immediately preceding tax year, gross income in excess of
$100,000, and reasonably expects gross income in excess of
$100,000 during the current tax year. Alternately, the
term applies to individuals who have a minimum net worth of
$500,000, exclusive of their home, home furnishings, and
AB 722
Page 9
automobiles. Natural persons are limited to investing no
more than 10% of their net worth in any 25012(n)
investment.
According to DBO, between 20 and 50 people file forms with
DBO annually, claiming exemptions pursuant to Section
25102(n).
5)Provides a fee of $2,500 for filing an application for
qualification of the sale of securities by permit.
[Corporations Code, Section 25608]
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown.
COMMENTS:
This bill is sponsored by Small Business California, to allow
small businesses and start-ups to more readily access capital.
AB 722 is substantially similar to previous bills advanced by
the same sponsors but takes a different approach. In previous
years, the sponsors attempted to secure an exemption from state
securities laws to authorize general solicitation and general
advertising to accredited investors. Last year, the sponsors
attempted to secure a qualification by notification, under which
issuers can use general solicitation and general advertising to
attract both accredited and non-accredited investors. This
year, through AB 722 the sponsors are attempting "qualification
by permit" under which issuers can use general solicitation and
general advertising (excluding unsolicited telephone calls) to
AB 722
Page 10
attract both accredited and non-accredited investors. In
addition, AB 722 attempts to use the term "crowdfunding" in the
measure. Whether or not AB 722 is actually crowdfunding is
debatable.
Under existing law, there are only three ways to qualify a
securities offering, all of which require significant review of
the offering by either the SEC or DBO. Those three ways include
coordination (Corporations Code Section 25211; involves
offerings registered under the Federal Securities Act of 1933);
notification (Section 25212; involves securities registered
under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act
of 1940); and permitting (a rigorous and often costly process in
which applicants apply to DBO for a permit that is good for one
year; Section 25213; according to DBO, only 130 permit
applications were filed with the DBO in 2013).
AB 722 takes the third approach of permitting. An applicant
turns in a permit application to offer securities. According to
AB 722 once the application is filed, the issuer may begin to
offer. The DBO has 60 days to approve the application, should
the review process take longer than 60 days, the offers
automatically become effective on the 60th day.
Crowdfunding:
AB 722
Page 11
Crowdfunding is a collective cooperation of people who network
and pool their money and resources together, usually via the
internet, to support efforts initiated by other organizations.
Crowdfunding literally attracts a "crowd" of people, each of
whom takes a small stake in a business idea by contributing
towards an online funding target. Crowdfunding has become a
popular and alternative method of raising finance for a
business, real estate investments, projects or ideas and has
become popularized online by sites such as Kickstarter,
Wefunder, Crowdfunder and RockthePost.
Crowdfunding is a means to raise money by attracting relatively
small individual contributions from a large number of people. In
recent years, crowdfunding websites have proliferated to raise
funds for charities, artistic endeavors and businesses. These
sites did not offer securities, such as an ownership interest or
share of profits in a business; rather, money was contributed in
the form of donations, or in return for the product being made.
While the goal of this measure is admirable, providing increased
access to capital for small businesses, the risks associated
with the measure could be at the expense of those most
vulnerable, un-sophisticated non-accredited and accredited
investors. AB 722 does have a cap of $5,000 which weakens the
ability for an issuer to take an investors lifesavings but small
business investments have even greater risk than normal. About
AB 722
Page 12
50 % of all small businesses fail within the first five years
according to a crowdfunding warning document issued by the North
American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA).
AB 722 does not provide for a platform or portal to solicit
accredited and non-accredited investors. AB 722 does require
issuers to place the investment in a third-party escrow account
instead but the measure is vague on who the escrow holder would
be, what protections would exist and what disclosures would be
required by the escrow holder. Since a platform is not used it
is not clear what method an issuer would use as far as general
solicitation and general advertising under AB 722. Title III of
the JOBS Act along with AB 722 expands securities to
equity-based crowdfunding. The public most often views
crowdfunding as donation based.
Chart below lays out important pieces of both Title III of the
Jobs Act and AB 722
------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Title III of JOBS | AB 722 |
| | Act | |
|------------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
|Nature of Authorization |Exemption from |Qualification by |
| |registration |Permit |
| |requirements of the | |
| |Securities Act of | |
| |1933 | |
|------------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
|Maximum Total Value of |$1 million per |$1 million per |
|Securities That May Be |12-month period |12-month period |
AB 722
Page 13
|Sold In Reliance on the | | |
|Authorization | | |
|------------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
|Maximum Aggregate Value |Investors with |Non-accredited |
|of Securities That May |annual income or |investors: $5,000 |
|Be Sold to a Single |net worth <$100K: |or a greater amount |
|Investor |greater of $2K or |as determined by |
| |5% of annual income |the commissioner. |
| |or net worth. | |
| | |Accredited |
| |Investors with |investors: No |
| |annual income or |limit other than |
| |net worth of $100K |the $1 million cap. |
| |or more: 10% of | |
| |annual income or | |
| |net worth, not to | |
| |exceed $100K. | |
|------------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
|Is An Intermediary |Yes. Transactions |No |
|Required? |must be conducted | |
| |through a | |
| |registered broker | |
| |or a registered | |
| |funding portal. | |
|------------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
|Requirements Applicable |Broker or portal |N/A |
|to Intermediaries |must register with | |
|(these requirements |the SEC and FINRA; | |
|will be clarified and |provide specified | |
|may be augmented by the |disclosures to | |
|SEC when it finalizes |investors; ensure | |
|its crowdfunding |that each investor | |
|regulations) |reviews specified | |
| |education | |
| |information that | |
| |will be established | |
| |by the SEC by | |
| |regulation and | |
| |affirms that they | |
AB 722
Page 14
| |understand the | |
| |risks of the | |
| |investment they are | |
| |about to undertake; | |
| |perform background | |
| |checks on persons | |
| |with key management | |
| |roles in the | |
| |issuer's | |
| |organization; make | |
| |key information | |
| |provided by the | |
| |issuer available to | |
| |investors; ensure | |
| |that all offering | |
| |proceeds are only | |
| |provided to the | |
| |issuer when the | |
| |aggregate capital | |
| |raised from all | |
| |investors is equal | |
| |to or greater than | |
| |a target offering | |
| |amount, and allow | |
| |investors to cancel | |
| |their commitments | |
| |to invest in | |
| |accordance with | |
| |rules to be | |
| |promulgated by the | |
| |SEC; undertake | |
| |efforts to ensure | |
| |that no individual | |
| |investor exceeds | |
| |the maximum | |
| |allowable purchase | |
| |of crowdfunding | |
| |offerings; protect | |
| |the privacy of | |
AB 722
Page 15
| |information | |
| |collected from | |
| |investors; refrain | |
| |from compensating | |
| |promoters, finders, | |
| |or lead generators | |
| |for providing the | |
| |broker or funding | |
| |portal with | |
| |personal | |
| |identifying | |
| |information about | |
| |any potential | |
| |investors; and | |
| |prohibit its | |
| |directors, | |
| |officers, or | |
| |partners from | |
| |having any | |
| |financial interest | |
| |in an issuer using | |
| |its services. | |
|------------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
|Requirements Applicable |Issuers must file |Issuers must file |
|to Issuers |with the SEC and |with the |
| |provide to |commissioner and |
| |investors and the |provide to |
| |broker or funding |investors a Small |
| |portal all of the |Company Offering |
| |following: key |Registration Form |
| |information about |U-7. The U-7 is a |
| |the identity of the |37-page document |
| |issuer, its key |(not including |
| |owners and |attachments) that |
| |management |includes |
| |personnel, its |information about |
| |business plan, a |the issuer, its |
| |description of the |management, and its |
| |financial condition |business plan, and |
AB 722
Page 16
| |of the issuer (see |about the offering, |
| |detail below); a |including a |
| |description of the |description of the |
| |stated purpose and |purpose and |
| |intended use of the |intended use of the |
| |proceeds of the |proceeds of the |
| |offering; the |offering. |
| |target offering |According to this |
| |amount, deadline to |bill's sponsor, the |
| |reach the target |two key |
| |offering amount, |requirements of the |
| |and regular updates |U-7 that are not |
| |regarding the |required by Title |
| |progress of the |III of the JOBS Act |
| |issuer in meeting |are the requirement |
| |the target |that the issuer |
| |offering; the price |describe what it |
| |to the public of |must do to meet key |
| |the securities |milestones and |
| |being offered; a |describe how it |
| |description of the |will use the |
| |ownership and |offering proceeds |
| |capital structure |if only the minimum |
| |of the issuer, and |offering amount is |
| |including a |raised. |
| |description of | |
| |specified risks to |Issuers must return |
| |purchasers. |all money raised |
| | |from investors, if |
| |Issuers are |they do not raise |
| |prohibited from |enough to meet |
| |advertising the |their minimum |
| |terms of the |offering amount. |
| |offering, except | |
| |through notices | |
| |that direct | |
| |investors to the | |
| |broker or funding | |
| |portal. Direct | |
AB 722
Page 17
| |solicitation of | |
| |investors is not | |
| |allowed. | |
| | | |
| |Issuers are | |
| |prohibited from | |
| |compensating or | |
| |committing to | |
| |compensate, | |
| |directly or | |
| |indirectly, any | |
| |person to promote | |
| |its offerings | |
| |through | |
| |communication | |
| |channels provided | |
| |by a broker or | |
| |funding portal, | |
| |without taking | |
| |steps to ensure | |
| |that the person | |
| |clearly discloses | |
| |receipt, past or | |
| |prospective, of | |
| |such compensation. | |
------------------------------------------------------------------
General Solicitation & General Advertising:
As their names imply, general solicitation and general
advertising are not targeted. They reach an audience that
includes both accredited and non-accredited investors.
According to the SEC, general solicitation includes
advertisements published in newspapers and magazines, public
AB 722
Page 18
websites, communications broadcasted over television and radio,
and seminars where attendees have been invited by general
solicitation or general advertising. Use of an unrestricted,
and therefore publicly available, website also constitutes
general solicitation. General advertising is general
solicitation made by means of an advertisement.
SCOR:
California, under existing law, already has the SCOR program
which was established through legislation in 1986. California
requires that SCOR offerings ($1 million or less) must be
qualified by the commissioner of DBO. Applicants that satisfy
SCOR conditions can use the Form U-7 disclosure document from
the NASAA. However, SCOR applicants must provide the financial
information required by the DBO rather than those required by
Form U-7. The current SCOR program is perceived as time
consuming and burdensome and is looked upon as unsuccessful.
Over the years, DBO has received very few applications on an
annual basis.
AB 722, instead of working within the SCOR program and improving
the existing qualification by permit, AB 722 layers a new permit
application process on top of the SCOR program. The SCOR program
also only applies intrastate while AB 722 states "within or
outside the state."
AB 722
Page 19
Background:
On April 5, 2012, President Obama signed landmark legislation,
H.R. 3606, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the "JOBS
Act"). The JOBS Act makes it easier for startups and small
businesses to raise funds. This legislation passed Congress
through a 73-26 Senate vote and a 380-41 House vote. As far as,
AB 722 is concerned, Title III of the JOBS Act requires the SEC
to develop new rules permitting capital raising by
"crowdfunding." SEC is still in the rule-making process and is
due to publish final regulations before non-SEC accredited
investors can start financing small businesses.
In October of 2013, the SEC issued the proposed crowdfunding
rules in a 585 page document. The JOBS Act creates an exemption
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933
that provides for a form of securities crowdfunding. The SEC
has not taken lightly the role of establishing a brand new type
of financial intermediary and a whole new regulatory process
which is why it is estimated the final rules will not be
released until October, 2015. The SEC has struggled to create a
set of rules that respected the flexible and democratic nature
of crowdfunding (which makes it so appealing to very small and
early stage start-up companies) while also implementing
sufficient regulation to satisfy consumer and investor
protection critics who fear that investment crowdfunding is far
too open to abuse and fraud.
AB 722
Page 20
Key features of the SEC's proposed rules:
A company will only be able to raise a maximum aggregate
amount of $1 million through crowdfunding offerings per
12-month period.
Companies raising less than $500,000 through crowdfunding
within any 12-month period will need to share financial
statements and income-tax returns with their investors and
those raising more than $500,000 will be obligated to provide
audited financial statements to investors.
Investors with an annual income or net worth of less than
$100,000 will be permitted to invest a maximum of $2,000 or 5%
of their annual income or net worth (whichever is greater) per
12-month period.
Investors with an annual income or net worth equal to or
greater than $100,000 will be permitted to invest up to 10% of
their annual income or net worth (whichever is greater) per
12-month period up to a total maximum of $100,000 in
securities.
Companies conducting a crowdfunding offering will need to file
certain information with the SEC, the relevant intermediary
facilitating the crowdfunding offering and potential
investors.
AB 722
Page 21
Private crowdfunding offerings will be conducted exclusively
online through a registered broker or funding platform
(portal). Funding platforms will be required to register with
the SEC. Non-US crowdfunding platforms will be able to
register with the SEC, subject to an on-site examination.
Registration rules for crowdfunding platforms, which were
developed in partnership with the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA released its set of
proposed rules, the Funding Portal Rules.
According to the Small Business Administration, "The SEC
released the notice of proposed rulemaking for Title III of the
JOBS Act on November 5, 2013. The proposal requested comments
on title definitions, investment limits, how income and net
worth are calculated for individuals, intermediaries, and many
other topics. The comment period closed February 3, 2014 after
receiving nearly 500 comments from individuals and
organizations. The SEC has not finalized the equity-based
crowdfunding rule yet, but has set a date of October 2015 to
take final action. This will provide prospective platforms,
investors, and small business entrepreneurs with the assurances
they need to go forward in planning for a future with
equity-based crowdfunding."
NASAA
AB 722
Page 22
AB 722 requires an issuer to file with the administrator
(commissioner of DBO) a small company offering registration
disclosure document on Form U-7. The form is found at the NASAA
website:
http://www.nasaa.org/industry-resources/corporation-finance/scor-
overview/scor-forms/. The form goes into detail, among other
things, the type of investment, potential risks to the investor,
the offering amount, and the deadline to reach the offering.
Other States:
A number of other states have enacted crowdfunding in a variety
of forms all only apply intrastate. These states include:
Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Idaho, Washington, Wisconsin and
Maine.
Federal Regulation A+:
On March 24, 2015, the SEC adopted final rules to implement the
AB 722
Page 23
rulemaking mandate of Title IV of the JOBS Act by adopting
amendments to Regulation A. In December 2013, the SEC had
released a proposed rule that essentially retained the current
framework of Regulation A and expanded if for larger exempt
offerings. Existing Regulation A provided an exemption from the
registration requirement of Section 5 for certain smaller
securities offering by private companies. The securities sold
in Regulation A offering are not considered "restricted
securities" and are freely transferable. The "New" Regulation A
provides an exemption for U.S. companies to raise up to
$50,000,000 in a 12-month period. The final rules create two
tiers: Tier 1 for smaller offerings raising up to $20,000,000
in any 12 month period and Tier 2 for offerings raising up to
$50,000,000. Tier 1 will be subject to both SEC and state blue
sky pre-sale review.
The finalized rules of Regulation A+ will be very appealing to
small businesses.
Questions & Concerns:
1)Should California enact intrastate crowdfunding or should the
Legislature wait until after the SEC finalizes the federal
crowdfunding rules in October, 2015? The SEC proposed rules
have been touted as being too stringent which may hinder those
who actually use it. Some would say this is intentional to
deter fraud and scams under this new framework. Ultimately,
AB 722
Page 24
the question is whether or not California needs to establish
its own crowdfunding framework which may be more lax and/or
conflict and if so, is that good? AB 722 if enacted would
allow and promote "regulation shopping." Issuers can
determine whether to register to adhere to federal regulations
or state securities regulations.
2)The economy is recovering, the unemployment rate is down, the
federal government acted, is there still a need to act on a
statewide level to produce more ways to raise capital? In
addition, the U.S. Treasury just gave the California State
Treasurer $55,218,250 in federal funds from the JOBS Act to
provide access to capital to small businesses through the
California Pollution Control Financing Authority and the
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank. This
is the second of three disbursements. Are small businesses
capitalizing on these funds?
3)As noted above in "other states," the states that have adopted
a crowdfunding framework are states that are desperately
trying to attract and lure in new businesses. California is
known as the start-up epicenter. According to a recent study
by Radius, a San Francisco technology company that collects
small business data in the U.S. of the top 12 places to
establish a start-up in 2014, California had three cities
which included: San Diego as number 1, San Francisco as
number 6 and San Jose as number 12. Are small businesses
really struggling to establish themselves in California? The
small businesses that would need to use crowdfunding may be
the types of businesses that have exhausted all other options
and if so, are these the type of businesses we want
established in California soliciting to potentially vulnerable
unsophisticated investors?
4)AB 722 makes clear that the securities sold could be "within
AB 722
Page 25
or outside California." Wouldn't anything outside California
conflict with federal rules? Other states who have enacted
state crowdfunding proposals only apply intrastate. How will
DBO be able to enforce?
Previous Legislation:
AB 2096 (Muratsuchi) (2014 Legislative Session) would have
created a new way in which a person seeking to offer or sell
securities could qualify their offering, by authorizing the
"qualification by notification" of offers or sales of securities
advertised by means of general solicitation and general
advertising, as specified. Died in the Senate Appropriations
Committee.
AB 783 (Daly) (2013 Legislative Session) provides that an issuer
can offer or sell securities using any form of general
solicitation or general advertising. Died in the Assembly
Banking and Finance Committee.
AB 2081 (Allen) (2012 Legislative Session) provides that an
issuer can offer or sell securities using any form of general
solicitation or general advertising. Died on the Senate Floor.
SB 875 (Price) (2010 Legislative Session) would have exempted
from qualification offerings or sales of securities using a
general solicitation or general advertising, provided the
AB 722
Page 26
transaction meets specified requirements, including a
requirement that the sales are made to accredited investors.
Died in Senate Banking and Financial Institutions.
AB 1644 (Campbell & Briggs) (2001 Legislative Session) would
have exempted from qualification offerings or sales of
securities using a general solicitation or general advertising,
provided the transaction meets specified requirements, including
a requirement that the sales are made to accredited investors.
Failed passage in Assembly Banking and Finance Committee.
Double Referral
This measure is double referred to the Assembly Judiciary
Committee.
Recommended Amendments:
The committee recommends that the author delete the "test the
water" provisions in the measure which allows an issuer to offer
securities prior to approval from DBO.
AB 722
Page 27
On page 3, delete , " or (B) an application for qualification
under Section 25113.1 has been filed with the commissioner but
has not yet become effective; "
On page 18, delete, "or (B) an application for qualification
under Section 25113.1 has been filed with the commissioner but
has not yet become effective; "
Technical Amendments:
Delete all references to "issuer" and insert "applicant"
On page 21, line 10, line 17, line 23, line 27, line 29, line
32, line 34, line 35, line 38
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
AB 722
Page 28
Support
California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce
California Association of Competitive Telecommunications
Companies (CALTEL)
California Association of Micro-economic Opportunity (CAMEO)
California Black Chamber of Commerce
California Disabled Veteran Business Alliance
California Fence Contractors Association
California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
California Metals Coalition (CMC)
Coleman & Horowitt LLP
Flasher Barricade Association
Golden Gate Business Association
Greater Geary Boulevard Merchants & Property Owners Association
AB 722
Page 29
National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)
North East Mission Business Association (NEMBA)
Northern California Independent Booksellers Association (NCIBA)
Plumbing Heating Cooling Contractors of California (PHCC)
San Francisco Builders Exchange
San Francisco Chamber of Commerce
San Francisco Council of District Merchants Association (SFCDMA)
San Francisco Locally Owned Merchants Alliance
San Francisco Small Business Network
Small Business California (SB-Cal)
Small Business Majority
South Bay Entrepreneurial Center (SBEC)
SpanishOne Translations, Inc.
AB 722
Page 30
Concerns
Consumers Attorneys of California
Opposition
AARP
Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association
Analysis Prepared by:Kathleen O'Malley / B. & F. / (916)
319-3081
AB 722
Page 31