BILL NUMBER: AB 740 AMENDED
BILL TEXT
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 20, 2015
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Weber
FEBRUARY 25, 2015
An act to add Section 60605.12 to the Education Code, relating to
academic content standards.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 740, as amended, Weber. Academic content standards: update of
adopted standards.
Existing law required the State Board of Education to adopt
statewide academic content standards in the core curriculum areas of
reading, writing, and mathematics, and requires the Academic Content
Standards Commission to develop academic content standards in
language arts and mathematics. Existing law also authorizes the
Superintendent of Public Instruction to recommend, and for the state
board to approve, modification modifications
to the common core academic content standards in mathematics,
as specified.
This bill would require the Superintendent, by January 1, 2017, to
recommend to the state board a schedule for the regular update of
academic content standards in all subjects for which standards have
been adopted by the state board in accordance with specified
procedures, including the establishment of academic content standards
advisory committees for those purposes and the recommendation of
proposed updates by those committees to the state board.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the
following:
(a) Since 1997, California has adopted academic content standards
in a variety of subjects, including English language arts,
mathematics, science, history-social science, visual and performing
arts, health, world languages, physical education, and career and
technical education.
(b) Starting in 2010, California adopted new academic content
standards in certain subjects, including the common core state
standards in English language arts and mathematics, and the Next
Generation Science Standards.
(c) There is currently no process in place to update content
standards, except for the creation of new legislation that authorizes
new standards in a given subject.
(d) Given regular changes in disciplinary knowledge and academic
research, it is often necessary to make modifications to content
standards that do not constitute a complete revision.
(e) A process for regular updating of the standards should be
designed to emphasize public access to the process, a reliance on
scholarship and current and confirmed research, and minimal
disruption to school districts using curriculum and assessments based
upon the standards.
SEC. 2. Section 60605.12 is added to the Education Code, to read:
60605.12. (a) By January 1, 2017, the Superintendent shall
recommend to the state board a schedule for the regular update of
academic content standards in all subjects for which standards have
been adopted by the state board. The schedule shall be aligned to the
current eight-year cycle of curriculum framework updates and
instructional materials adoptions pursuant to paragraph (1) of
subdivision (b) of Section 60200. It is the intent of the
Legislature that content standards are updated before the revising of
curriculum frameworks, and that curriculum fram ework
revisions occur before the adoption of instructional materials.
(b) (1) When the academic content standards
in a given subject area come up for review according to the schedule
adopted under subdivision (a), the state board shall make a
determination as to whether those standards require an update. That
determination shall be based upon the following considerations:
(1)
( A) The amount of time since the standards
were adopted or last updated.
(2)
( B) Whether additional research conducted
since the standards were adopted or last updated justifies updates to
the standards.
(3)
( C) The potential impact on existing
curriculum, instructional materials, and assessment systems based
upon the standards.
(2) Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to prohibit the
consideration of national standards adopted by other states in
making this determination.
(c) If the state board determines that an update to the academic
content standards in a given subject is warranted, it shall convene
an academic content standards advisory committee to recommend updates
to the content standards in that subject. A
An academic content standards advisory committee shall consist
of 21 members, appointed as follows:
(1) Ten members appointed by the Governor.
(2) Four members appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules.
(3) Four members appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly.
(4) Three members appointed by the Superintendent.
(d) Members of a an academic content
standards advisory committee shall serve at the pleasure of the
appointing authority.
(e) Not less than one-half of the members appointed by each of the
appointing authorities pursuant to subdivision (c) shall be current
public school elementary or secondary classroom teachers who have a
professional credential under state law, and meet the definition of
"highly qualified" under federal law.
(f) It is the intent of the Legislature that all of the following
occur:
(1) The academic content standards advisory committees include
representation from teachers of different grade level spans,
including elementary, middle, and high school grades.
(2) A member of an academic content standards advisory committee
possesses a thorough knowledge of the academic content standards in
the content area and grade level span in which he or she is
appointed.
(3) An academic content standards advisory committee membership
reflects the diversity of the various ethnic groups, types of school
districts, and regions in California.
(f)
( g) Each academic content standards
advisory committee shall review the content standards established in
its particular subject matter and shall prepare updates to the
standards as the committee deems necessary.
(g)
( h) When making its recommendation, an
academic content standards advisory committee shall consider both of
the following criteria:
(1) The extent to which its proposed updates reflect current and
confirmed research in the subject area under consideration.
(2) The impact that the proposed updates will have upon school
districts and existing curricula and assessments.
(h)
( i) An academic content standards advisory
committee shall conduct at least two, and no more than six, in-person
meetings that are open to the public and include opportunities for
public input. The An academic
content standards advisory committee may convene
additional meetings by teleconference or the Internet subject to the
requirements of Article 9 (commencing with Section 11120) of Chapter
1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(i)
( j) Upon completing this review, the terms
of the members of an academic content standards advisory
committee shall cease.
(j)
( k) Upon updating the standards, an
academic content standards advisory committee shall forward them to
the state board, which shall do either of the following within 120
days of the receipt:
(1) Adopt the proposed updates as proposed by the committee.
(2) Reject the proposed updates as proposed by the committee. If
the state board rejects the standards it shall provide a specific
written explanation to the Superintendent, the Governor, and the
Legislature of the reasons why the proposed standards were rejected.
(k) Prior to
( l ) Before
final action pursuant to subdivision (f),
(g), the department shall post on its Internet Web site
the updates proposed by an academic content standards advisory
committee for a minimum of 60 days. The department shall include a
link by which members of the public may submit comments on the
proposed updates.
(l)
( m) Members of an academic content
standards advisory committee shall serve without compensation, except
for actual and necessary travel expenses and substitute costs.
(m)
( n) The Superintendent shall develop, and
the state board shall adopt, guidelines to implement this section.
(n)
( o) The convening of an academic content
standards advisory committee is contingent upon the Legislature
appropriating funds for that purpose in the annual Budget Act.