Amended in Senate June 23, 2015

Amended in Assembly June 2, 2015

Amended in Assembly March 26, 2015

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly Bill No. 744

Introduced by Assembly begin delete Member end delete begin insert Members end insert Chau begin insert and Quirk end insert

(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Gonzalez)

February 25, 2015

An act to amend Section 65915 of the Government Code, relating to housing.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 744, as amended, Chau. Planning and zoning: density bonuses.

The Planning and Zoning Law requires, when a developer of housing proposes a housing development within the jurisdiction of the local government, that the city, county, or city and county provide the developer with a density bonus and other incentives or concessions for the production of lower income housing units or the donation of land within the development if the developer, among other things, agrees to construct a specified percentage of units for very low, low-, or moderate-income households or qualifying residents. Existing law requires continued affordability for 55 years or longer, as specified, of all very low and low-income units that qualified an applicant for a density bonus. Existing law prohibits a city, county, or city and county from requiring a vehicular parking ratio for a housing development that meets these criteria in excess of specified ratios. This prohibition applies only at the request of the developer and specifies that the developer may request additional parking incentives or concessions.

This bill would, notwithstanding the above-described provisions, additionally prohibit, at the request of the developer, a city, county, or city and county from imposing a vehicular parking ratio in excess of 0.5 spaces per bedroom on a development that includes the maximum percentage of low- begin delete and end delete begin insert or end insert very low income units, as specified, and is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop, as defined, and there is unobstructed access to the transit stop from the development. The bill would also prohibit, at the request of the developer, a city, county, or city and county from imposing a vehicular parking ratio in excess of specified amounts per unit on a development that consists solely of units with an affordable housing cost to lower income households, as specified, if the development is within one-half mile of a major transit stop and there is unobstructed access to the transit stop from the development, is a for-rent housing development for individuals that are 62 years of age or older, begin insert that complies with specified existing laws regarding senior housing, end insert or is a special needs housing development, as those terms are defined. The bill would make findings and declarations in this regard, including that this constitutes a matter of statewide concern and is not a municipal affair.

By imposing additional duties on local governments in awarding density bonuses, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
following:

(a) Having a healthy housing market that provides an adequate
supply of homes that are affordable to Californians at all income
levels is critical to the economic prosperity and quality of life in
the state.

(b) There exists a severe shortage of affordable housing,
especially for persons and families of extremely low, very low and
low income, and there is an immediate need to encourage the
development of new housing, not only through the provision of
financial assistance but also through reforms to regulation.

(c) Affordable housing is expensive to build in California.

(d) The cost of building affordable housing in California is
impacted by local opposition, changes imposed by local design
and review, and requirements for on-site parking.

(e) The average construction cost per space, excluding land
cost, in a parking structure in the United States is about $24,000
for aboveground parking and $34,000 for underground parking.
In an affordable housing project with a fixed budget, every $24,000
spent on a required parking space is $24,000 less to spend on
housing.

(f) The biggest single determinant of vehicle miles traveled and
therefore greenhouse gas emissions is ownership of a private
vehicle.

(g) A review of developments funded through the Department
of Housing and Community Development’s Transit-Oriented
Development Implementation Program (TOD program) shows
that lower Income households drive 25 to 30 percent fewer miles
when living within one-half mile of transit than those living in
non-TOD program areas. When living within one-quarter mile of
frequent transit, they drove nearly 50 percent less.

(h) When cities require off-street parking with all new residential
construction, they shift what should be the cost of driving, the cost
of parking a car, into the cost of housing, which artificially
increases the cost of housing.

(i) Increases in public transportation and shared mobility options
and the development of more walkable and bikeable neighborhoods
reduce the demand for parking.

(j) Consistent with Chapter 488 of the Statues of 2006 (AB 32)
and Chapter 728 of the Statutes of 2008 (SB 375), it is state policy
to promote transit-oriented infill development to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions.

(k) The high cost of the land and improvements required to
provide parking significantly increases the cost of transit-oriented
development, making lower cost and affordable housing
development financially infeasible and hindering the goals of SB
375.

(l) Eliminating minimum parking requirements will allow the
limited funding available for affordable housing to support more
housing for more Californians. A given housing subsidy fund can
benefit about 6.5 times more households with no parking spaces
than households with 2 spaces per unit.

(m) Minimum parking requirements provide large subsidies for
parking, which in turn encourage more people to drive cars.

(n) Minimum parking requirements create a barrier to effective
use of the density bonus law contained in Section 65915 of the
Government Code. The parking required for the extra units adds
construction and land costs that may be prohibitive and requires
vacant land that may be unavailable, especially in locations near
transit.

(o) Increasing the supply of affordable housing near transit helps
achieve deeper affordability through reduced transportation costs,
in addition to reduced housing costs.

(p) Governmental parking requirements for infill and
transit-oriented development reduce the viability of transit by
limiting the number of households or workers near transit,
increasing walking distances, and degrading the pedestrian
environment.

(q) Reducing or eliminating minimum parking requirements for
infill and transit-oriented development and allowing builders and
the market to decide how much parking is needed can achieve all
of the following:

(1) Ensure sufficient amounts of parking at almost all times.

(2) Reduce the cost of development and increase the number of
transit-accessible and affordable housing units.

(3) Allow for more effective use of the density bonus law.

(4) Increase density in areas with the most housing demand,
and improve the viability of developing alternate modes of
transportation, such as public transit, ridesharing, biking, and
walking.

(5) Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled
by removing an incentive to drive.

(r) It is the intent of the Legislature to reduce the cost of
development by eliminating excessive minimum parking
requirements for transit-oriented developments that includes
affordable housing, senior housing, and special needs housing.

(s) The Legislature further declares that the need to address
infill development and excessive parking requirements is a matter
of statewide concern and is not a municipal affair as that term is
used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution.
Therefore, this act shall apply to all cities, including charter cities.

SEC. 2.  

Section 65915 of the Government Code is amended
to read:

65915.  

(a) When an applicant seeks a density bonus for a
housing development within, or for the donation of land for housing
within, the jurisdiction of a city, county, or city and county, that
local government shall provide the applicant with incentives or
concessions for the production of housing units and child care
facilities as prescribed in this section. All cities, counties, or cities
and counties shall adopt an ordinance that specifies how
compliance with this section will be implemented. Failure to adopt
an ordinance shall not relieve a city, county, or city and county
from complying with this section.

(b) (1) A city, county, or city and county shall grant one density
bonus, the amount of which shall be as specified in subdivision
(f), and incentives or concessions, as described in subdivision (d),
when an applicant for a housing development seeks and agrees to
construct a housing development, excluding any units permitted
by the density bonus awarded pursuant to this section, that will
contain at least any one of the following:

(A) Ten percent of the total units of a housing development for
lower income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the
Health and Safety Code.

(B) Five percent of the total units of a housing development for
very low income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the
Health and Safety Code.

(C) A senior citizen housing development, as defined in Sections
51.3 and 51.12 of the Civil Code, or a mobilehome park that limits
residency based on age requirements for housing for older persons
pursuant to Section 798.76 or 799.5 of the Civil Code.

(D) Ten percent of the total dwelling units in a common interest
development, as defined in Section 4100 of the Civil Code, for
persons and families of moderate income, as defined in Section
50093 of the Health and Safety Code, provided that all units in the
development are offered to the public for purchase.

(2) For purposes of calculating the amount of the density bonus
pursuant to subdivision (f), an applicant who requests a density
bonus pursuant to this subdivision shall elect whether the bonus
shall be awarded on the basis of subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D)
of paragraph (1).

(3) For the purposes of this section, “total units” or “total
dwelling units” does not include units added by a density bonus
awarded pursuant to this section or any local law granting a greater
density bonus.

(c) (1) An applicant shall agree to, and the city, county, or city
and county shall ensure, the continued affordability of all very low
and low-income rental units that qualified the applicant for the
award of the density bonus for 55 years or a longer period of time
if required by the construction or mortgage financing assistance
program, mortgage insurance program, or rental subsidy program.
Rents for the lower income density bonus units shall be set at an
affordable rent as defined in Section 50053 of the Health and Safety
Code.

(2) An applicant shall agree to, and the city, county, or city and
county shall ensure that, the initial occupant of all for-sale units
that qualified the applicant for the award of the density bonus are
persons and families of very low, low, or moderate income, as
required, and that the units are offered at an affordable housing
cost, as that cost is defined in Section 50052.5 of the Health and
Safety Code. The local government shall enforce an equity sharing
agreement, unless it is in conflict with the requirements of another
public funding source or law. The following apply to the equity
sharing agreement:

(A) Upon resale, the seller of the unit shall retain the value of
any improvements, the downpayment, and the seller’s proportionate
share of appreciation. The local government shall recapture any
initial subsidy, as defined in subparagraph (B), and its proportionate
share of appreciation, as defined in subparagraph (C), which
amount shall be used within five years for any of the purposes
described in subdivision (e) of Section 33334.2 of the Health and
Safety Code that promote home ownership.

(B) For purposes of this subdivision, the local government’s
initial subsidy shall be equal to the fair market value of the home
at the time of initial sale minus the initial sale price to the
moderate-income household, plus the amount of any downpayment
assistance or mortgage assistance. If upon resale the market value
is lower than the initial market value, then the value at the time of
the resale shall be used as the initial market value.

(C) For purposes of this subdivision, the local government’s
proportionate share of appreciation shall be equal to the ratio of
the local government’s initial subsidy to the fair market value of
the home at the time of initial sale.

(3) (A) An applicant shall be ineligible for a density bonus or
any other incentives or concessions under this section if the housing
development is proposed on any property that includes a parcel or
parcels on which rental dwelling units are or, if the dwelling units
have been vacated or demolished in the five-year period preceding
the application, have been subject to a recorded covenant,
ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons
and families of lower or very low income; subject to any other
form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise
of its police power; or occupied by lower or very low income
households, unless the proposed housing development replaces
those units, and either of the following applies:

(i) The proposed housing development, inclusive of the units
replaced pursuant to this paragraph, contains affordable units at
the percentages set forth in subdivision (b).

(ii) Each unit in the development, exclusive of a manager’s unit
or units, is affordable to, and occupied by, either a lower or very
low income household.

(B) For the purposes of this paragraph, “replace” shall mean
either of the following:

(i) If any dwelling units described in subparagraph (A) are
occupied on the date of application, the proposed housing
development shall provide at least the same number of units of
equivalent size or type, or both, to be made available at affordable
rent or affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, persons and
families in the same or lower income category as those households
in occupancy. For unoccupied dwelling units described in
subparagraph (A) in a development with occupied units, the
proposed housing development shall provide units of equivalent
size or type, or both, to be made available at affordable rent or
affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, persons and families
in the same or lower income category in the same proportion of
affordability as the occupied units. All replacement calculations
resulting in fractional units shall be rounded up to the next whole
number. If the replacement units will be rental dwelling units,
these units shall be subject to a recorded affordability restriction
for at least 55 years. If the proposed development is for-sale units,
the units replaced shall be subject to paragraph (2).

(ii) If all dwelling units described in subparagraph (A) have
been vacated or demolished within the five-year period preceding
the application, the proposed housing development shall provide
at least the same number of units of equivalent size or type, or
both, as existed at the highpoint of those units in the five-year
period preceding the application to be made available at affordable
rent or affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, persons and
families in the same or lower income category as those persons
and families in occupancy at that time, if known. If the incomes
of the persons and families in occupancy at the highpoint is not
known, then one-half of the required units shall be made available
at affordable rent or affordable housing cost to, and occupied by,
very low income persons and families and one-half of the required
units shall be made available for rent at affordable housing costs
to, and occupied by, low-income persons and families. All
replacement calculations resulting in fractional units shall be
rounded up to the next whole number. If the replacement units will
be rental dwelling units, these units shall be subject to a recorded
affordability restriction for at least 55 years. If the proposed
development is for-sale units, the units replaced shall be subject
to paragraph (2).

(C) Paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) does not apply to an
applicant seeking a density bonus for a proposed housing
development if his or her application was submitted to, or
processed by, a city, county, or city and county before January 1,
2015.

(d) (1) An applicant for a density bonus pursuant to subdivision
(b) may submit to a city, county, or city and county a proposal for
the specific incentives or concessions that the applicant requests
pursuant to this section, and may request a meeting with the city,
county, or city and county. The city, county, or city and county
shall grant the concession or incentive requested by the applicant
unless the city, county, or city and county makes a written finding,
based upon substantial evidence, of any of the following:

(A) The concession or incentive is not required in order to
provide for affordable housing costs, as defined in Section 50052.5
of the Health and Safety Code, or for rents for the targeted units
to be set as specified in subdivision (c).

(B) The concession or incentive would have a specific adverse
impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section
65589.5, upon public health and safety or the physical environment
or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of
Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to
satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without
rendering the development unaffordable to low- and
moderate-income households.

(C) The concession or incentive would be contrary to state or
federal law.

(2) The applicant shall receive the following number of
incentives or concessions:

(A) One incentive or concession for projects that include at least
10 percent of the total units for lower income households, at least
5 percent for very low income households, or at least 10 percent
for persons and families of moderate income in a common interest
development.

(B) Two incentives or concessions for projects that include at
least 20 percent of the total units for lower income households, at
least 10 percent for very low income households, or at least 20
percent for persons and families of moderate income in a common
interest development.

(C) Three incentives or concessions for projects that include at
least 30 percent of the total units for lower income households, at
least 15 percent for very low income households, or at least 30
percent for persons and families of moderate income in a common
interest development.

(3) The applicant may initiate judicial proceedings if the city,
county, or city and county refuses to grant a requested density
bonus, incentive, or concession. If a court finds that the refusal to
grant a requested density bonus, incentive, or concession is in
violation of this section, the court shall award the plaintiff
reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of suit. Nothing in this
subdivision shall be interpreted to require a local government to
grant an incentive or concession that has a specific, adverse impact,
as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5,
upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which
there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the
specific adverse impact. Nothing in this subdivision shall be
interpreted to require a local government to grant an incentive or
concession that would have an adverse impact on any real property
that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources.
The city, county, or city and county shall establish procedures for
carrying out this section, that shall include legislative body
approval of the means of compliance with this section.

(e) (1) In no case may a city, county, or city and county apply
any development standard that will have the effect of physically
precluding the construction of a development meeting the criteria
of subdivision (b) at the densities or with the concessions or
incentives permitted by this section. An applicant may submit to
a city, county, or city and county a proposal for the waiver or
reduction of development standards that will have the effect of
physically precluding the construction of a development meeting
the criteria of subdivision (b) at the densities or with the
concessions or incentives permitted under this section, and may
request a meeting with the city, county, or city and county. If a
court finds that the refusal to grant a waiver or reduction of
development standards is in violation of this section, the court
shall award the plaintiff reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of
suit. Nothing in this subdivision shall be interpreted to require a
local government to waive or reduce development standards if the
waiver or reduction would have a specific, adverse impact, as
defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5,
upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which
there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the
specific adverse impact. Nothing in this subdivision shall be
interpreted to require a local government to waive or reduce
development standards that would have an adverse impact on any
real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical
Resources, or to grant any waiver or reduction that would be
contrary to state or federal law.

(2) A proposal for the waiver or reduction of development
standards pursuant to this subdivision shall neither reduce nor
increase the number of incentives or concessions to which the
applicant is entitled pursuant to subdivision (d).

(f) For the purposes of this chapter, “density bonus” means a
density increase over the otherwise maximum allowable residential
density as of the date of application by the applicant to the city,
county, or city and county. The applicant may elect to accept a
lesser percentage of density bonus. The amount of density bonus
to which the applicant is entitled shall vary according to the amount
by which the percentage of affordable housing units exceeds the
percentage established in subdivision (b).

(1) For housing developments meeting the criteria of
subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), the density
bonus shall be calculated as follows:

 

Percentage Low-Income Units	Percentage Density Bonus
10	20
11	21.5
12	23
13	24.5
14	26
15	27.5
17	30.5
18	32
19	33.5
20	35

 

(2) For housing developments meeting the criteria of
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), the density
bonus shall be calculated as follows:

 

Percentage Very Low Income Units	Percentage Density Bonus
5	20
6	22.5
7	25
8	27.5
9	30
10	32.5
11	35

 

(3) For housing developments meeting the criteria of
subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), the density
bonus shall be 20 percent of the number of senior housing units.

(4) For housing developments meeting the criteria of
subparagraph (D) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), the density
bonus shall be calculated as follows:

 

Percentage Moderate-Income Units	Percentage Density Bonus
10	5
11	6
12	7
13	8
14	9
15	10
16	11
17	12
18	13
19	14
20	15
21	16
22	17
23	18
24	19
25	20
26	21
27	22
28	23
29	24
30	25
31	26
32	27
33	28
34	29
35	30
36	31
37	32
38	33
39	34
40	35

 

(5) All density calculations resulting in fractional units shall be
rounded up to the next whole number. The granting of a density
bonus shall not be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a general
plan amendment, local coastal plan amendment, zoning change,
or other discretionary approval.

(g) (1) When an applicant for a tentative subdivision map,
parcel map, or other residential development approval donates
land to a city, county, or city and county in accordance with this
subdivision, the applicant shall be entitled to a 15-percent increase
above the otherwise maximum allowable residential density for
the entire development, as follows:

 

Percentage Very Low Income	Percentage Density Bonus
10	15
11	16
12	17
13	18
14	19
15	20
16	21
17	22
18	23
19	24
20	25
21	26
22	27
23	28
24	29
25	30
26	31
27	32
28	33
29	34
30	35

 

(2) This increase shall be in addition to any increase in density
mandated by subdivision (b), up to a maximum combined mandated
density increase of 35 percent if an applicant seeks an increase
pursuant to both this subdivision and subdivision (b). All density
calculations resulting in fractional units shall be rounded up to the
next whole number. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed
to enlarge or diminish the authority of a city, county, or city and
county to require a developer to donate land as a condition of
development. An applicant shall be eligible for the increased
density bonus described in this subdivision if all of the following
conditions are met:

(A) The applicant donates and transfers the land no later than
the date of approval of the final subdivision map, parcel map, or
residential development application.

(B) The developable acreage and zoning classification of the
land being transferred are sufficient to permit construction of units
affordable to very low income households in an amount not less
than 10 percent of the number of residential units of the proposed
development.

(C) The transferred land is at least one acre in size or of
sufficient size to permit development of at least 40 units, has the
appropriate general plan designation, is appropriately zoned with
appropriate development standards for development at the density
described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2,
and is or will be served by adequate public facilities and
infrastructure.

(D) The transferred land shall have all of the permits and
approvals, other than building permits, necessary for the
development of the very low income housing units on the
transferred land, not later than the date of approval of the final
subdivision map, parcel map, or residential development
application, except that the local government may subject the
proposed development to subsequent design review to the extent
authorized by subdivision (i) of Section 65583.2 if the design is
not reviewed by the local government prior to the time of transfer.

(E) The transferred land and the affordable units shall be subject
to a deed restriction ensuring continued affordability of the units
consistent with paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (c), which
shall be recorded on the property at the time of the transfer.

(F) The land is transferred to the local agency or to a housing
developer approved by the local agency. The local agency may
require the applicant to identify and transfer the land to the
developer.

(G) The transferred land shall be within the boundary of the
proposed development or, if the local agency agrees, within
one-quarter mile of the boundary of the proposed development.

(H) A proposed source of funding for the very low income units
shall be identified not later than the date of approval of the final
subdivision map, parcel map, or residential development
application.

(h) (1) When an applicant proposes to construct a housing
development that conforms to the requirements of subdivision (b)
and includes a child care facility that will be located on the
premises of, as part of, or adjacent to, the project, the city, county,
or city and county shall grant either of the following:

(A) An additional density bonus that is an amount of square
feet of residential space that is equal to or greater than the amount
of square feet in the child care facility.

(B) An additional concession or incentive that contributes
significantly to the economic feasibility of the construction of the
child care facility.

(2) The city, county, or city and county shall require, as a
condition of approving the housing development, that the following
occur:

(A) The child care facility shall remain in operation for a period
of time that is as long as or longer than the period of time during
which the density bonus units are required to remain affordable
pursuant to subdivision (c).

(B) Of the children who attend the child care facility, the
children of very low income households, lower income households,
or families of moderate income shall equal a percentage that is
equal to or greater than the percentage of dwelling units that are
required for very low income households, lower income
households, or families of moderate income pursuant to subdivision
(b).

(3) Notwithstanding any requirement of this subdivision, a city,
county, or city and county shall not be required to provide a density
bonus or concession for a child care facility if it finds, based upon
substantial evidence, that the community has adequate child care
facilities.

(4) “Child care facility,” as used in this section, means a child
day care facility other than a family day care home, including, but
not limited to, infant centers, preschools, extended day care
facilities, and schoolage child care centers.

(i) “Housing development,” as used in this section, means a
development project for five or more residential units. For the
purposes of this section, “housing development” also includes a
subdivision or common interest development, as defined in Section
4100 of the Civil Code, approved by a city, county, or city and
county and consists of residential units or unimproved residential
lots and either a project to substantially rehabilitate and convert
an existing commercial building to residential use or the substantial
rehabilitation of an existing multifamily dwelling, as defined in
subdivision (d) of Section 65863.4, where the result of the
rehabilitation would be a net increase in available residential units.
For the purpose of calculating a density bonus, the residential units
shall be on contiguous sites that are the subject of one development
application, but do not have to be based upon individual
subdivision maps or parcels. The density bonus shall be permitted
in geographic areas of the housing development other than the
areas where the units for the lower income households are located.

(j) (1) The granting of a concession or incentive shall not be
interpreted, in and of itself, to require a general plan amendment,
local coastal plan amendment, zoning change, or other discretionary
approval. This provision is declaratory of existing law.

(2) Except as provided in subdivisions (d) and (e), the granting
of a density bonus shall not be interpreted to require the waiver of
a local ordinance or provisions of a local ordinance unrelated to
development standards.

(k) For the purposes of this chapter, concession or incentive
means any of the following:

(1) A reduction in site development standards or a modification
of zoning code requirements or architectural design requirements
that exceed the minimum building standards approved by the
California Building Standards Commission as provided in Part 2.5
(commencing with Section 18901) of Division 13 of the Health
and Safety Code, including, but not limited to, a reduction in
setback and square footage requirements and in the ratio of
vehicular parking spaces that would otherwise be required that
results in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost
reductions.

(2) Approval of mixed-use zoning in conjunction with the
housing project if commercial, office, industrial, or other land uses
will reduce the cost of the housing development and if the
commercial, office, industrial, or other land uses are compatible
with the housing project and the existing or planned development
in the area where the proposed housing project will be located.

(3) Other regulatory incentives or concessions proposed by the
developer or the city, county, or city and county that result in
identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions.

(l) Subdivision (k) does not limit or require the provision of
direct financial incentives for the housing development, including
the provision of publicly owned land, by the city, county, or city
and county, or the waiver of fees or dedication requirements.

(m) This section does not supersede or in any way alter or lessen
the effect or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976
(Division 20 (commencing with Section 30000) of the Public
Resources Code).

(n) If permitted by local ordinance, nothing in this section shall
be construed to prohibit a city, county, or city and county from
granting a density bonus greater than what is described in this
section for a development that meets the requirements of this
section or from granting a proportionately lower density bonus
than what is required by this section for developments that do not
meet the requirements of this section.

(o) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall
apply:

(1) “Development standard” includes a site or construction
condition, including, but not limited to, a height limitation, a
setback requirement, a floor area ratio, an onsite open-space
requirement, or a parking ratio that applies to a residential
development pursuant to any ordinance, general plan element,
specific plan, charter, or other local condition, law, policy,
resolution, or regulation.

(2) “Maximum allowable residential density” means the density
allowed under the zoning ordinance and land use element of the
general plan, or if a range of density is permitted, means the
maximum allowable density for the specific zoning range and land
use element of the general plan applicable to the project. Where
the density allowed under the zoning ordinance is inconsistent
with the density allowed under the land use element of the general
plan, the general plan density shall prevail.

(p) (1)  Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), a city,
county, or city and county shall not require a vehicular parking
ratio, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, of a development
meeting the criteria of begin delete subdivision (b), end delete begin insert subdivisions (b) and (c), end insert
that exceeds the following ratios:

(A) Zero to one bedroom: one onsite parking space.

(B) Two to three bedrooms: two onsite parking spaces.

(C) Four and more bedrooms: two and one-half parking spaces.

(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), if a development includes
the maximum percentage of low- begin delete and end delete begin insert or end insert very low income units
provided for in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (f) and is
located within one-half mile of a major transit stop, as defined in
subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code,
and there is unobstructed access to the major transit stop from the
development, then, upon the request of the developer, a city,
county, or city and county shall not impose a vehicular parking
ratio that exceeds 0.5 spaces per bedroom.

(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), if a development consists
solely of rental units, exclusive of a manager’s unit or units, with
an affordable housing cost to lower income families, as provided
in Section 50052.5 of the Health and Safety Code, then, upon the
request of the developer, a city, county, or city and county shall
not impose a minimum vehicular parking requirement, if the
development meets any of the following criteria:

(A) The development is located within one-half mile of a major
transit stop, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the
Public Resources Code, and there is unobstructed access to the
major transit stop from the development. begin insert For purposes of this
paragraph, a development shall have unobstructed access to the
major transit stop if a resident is able to walk to the major transit
stop without encountering natural or constructed impediments. end insert

(B) The development is a for-rent housing development for
individuals who are 62 years of age or begin delete older. end delete begin insert older that complies
with Sections 51.2 and 51.3 of the Civil Code. end insert

(C) The development is a special needs housing development,
as defined in Section 51312 of the Health and Safety Code.

(4) If the total number of parking spaces required for a
development is other than a whole number, the number shall be
rounded up to the next whole number. For purposes of this
subdivision, a development may provide on-site parking through
tandem parking or uncovered parking, but not through on-street
parking.

(5) This subdivision shall apply to a development that meets
the requirements of begin delete subdivision end delete begin insert subdivisions end insert (b) begin insert and (c), end insert but only
at the request of the applicant. An applicant may request parking
incentives or concessions beyond those provided in this subdivision
pursuant to subdivision (d).

(6) This subdivision does not preclude a city, county, or city
and county from reducing or eliminating a parking requirement
for development projects of any type in any location.

(7) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), begin delete a end delete begin insert if a city, county
or city and county has conducted an area-wide or jurisdiction-wide
parking study in the last 5 years, then the end insert city, county, or city and
county may impose a higher begin delete parking standard, end delete begin insert vehicular parking
ratio end insert not to exceed the begin delete standard end delete begin insert ratio end insert described in paragraph (1),
based upon substantial evidence found in begin delete an area-wide, or
jurisdiction-wide end delete begin insert the end insert parking study conducted by an independent
begin delete consultant within the last 5 years, end delete begin insert consultant, end insert that includes, but is
not limited to, an analysis of parking availability, differing levels
of transit access, walkability access to transit services, the potential
for shared parking, and the effect of parking requirements on the
cost of market-rate and subsidized developments. The city, county,
or city and county shall make findings supporting the need for the
higher parking ratio.

SEC. 3.  

If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.