BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 744 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 744 (Chau) As Amended June 2, 2015 Majority vote -------------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes |Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+------+----------------------+---------------------| |Housing |6-1 |Chau, Steinorth, |Beth Gaines | | | |Burke, Chiu, Lopez, | | | | |Mullin | | | | | | | |----------------+------+----------------------+---------------------| |Local |7-2 |Gonzalez, Alejo, |Maienschein, Waldron | |Government | |Chiu, Cooley, Gordon, | | | | |Holden, Linder | | | | | | | |----------------+------+----------------------+---------------------| |Appropriations |12-4 |Gomez, Bonta, |Bigelow, Chang, | | | |Calderon, Daly, |Gallagher, Wagner | | | |Eggman, Eduardo | | | | |Garcia, Gordon, | | | | |Holden, Quirk, | | | | |Rendon, Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- AB 744 Page 2 SUMMARY: Requires a city, county, or city and county, upon the request of a developer that receives a density bonus, to reduce or eliminate the minimum parking requirements for the development, if it meets specified criteria. Specifically, this bill: 1)Includes legislative intent language. 2)Defines a "major transit stop" to have the same meaning as Public Resources Code Section 21155(b). 3)Provides that when a developer agrees to include the maximum number of very low- and low- income units under Density Bonus Law within one-half mile of a major transit stop and with unobstructed access to the major transit stop from the development, then upon the request of the developer a city, county, or city and county shall not impose a parking ratio that exceeds 0.5 spaces per bedroom. 4)Provides that if a development is 100% affordable to lower income families then upon the request of a developer, a city, county, or city and county, shall eliminate the minimum parking requirements for the development, if it meets one of the following criteria: a) The development is located within one-half mile of a "major transit stop" and there is unobstructed access to the major transit stop from the development; b) The development is a for-rent housing development for individuals who are 62 years of age or older; or c) The development is a special needs housing development. AB 744 Page 3 1)Provides that this bill does not preclude a city, county, or city and county from reducing or eliminating a parking requirement for developments of any type or location. 2)Allows a city, county, or city and county to impose a higher parking standard than the one for 2), and 3), above, that does not exceed the standard under Density Bonus Law, based upon substantial evidence in an area-wide or jurisdiction-wide parking study conducted by an independent consultant within the last five years that includes but is not limited to an analysis of: parking availability, differing levels of transit access, walkability access to transit services, the potential for shared parking, and the effect of parking requirements on the cost of market-rate and subsidized parking. 3)Requires the city, county, or city and county who has completed a parking study and imposes a higher standard than 2) and 3) above, to make findings supporting the need for a higher parking ratio. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, the fiscal impact is minor, non-reimbursable costs to cities and counties. COMMENTS: Background: California is facing a housing affordability crisis on many fronts. According to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, California has six of the most expensive rental AB 744 Page 4 markets in the country. Nationwide, rents in 2014 grew the fastest in the San Jose and San Francisco metropolitan areas, increasing by 14.4% and 13.5%, respectively. Between 2006 and 2011, rents increased throughout the state by an average of 10%. Lower-income households represent a majority of renter households. Out of 5.1 million renters in California, 60% are in lower-income households, while one in four renter households are in the extremely low-income. One in two renters in California pay in excess of 30% of their income towards housing and one in four renters pay half of their income towards housing. The funding sources to support construction of affordable housing have drastically diminished over the last five years. The dissolution of redevelopment agencies eliminated up to $1 billion in funding that was available for affordable housing construction. The last statewide housing bond was approved in 2008 and the proceeds of those bonds have been exhausted. Density Bonus Law: To help address California's affordable housing shortage, the Legislature enacted density bonus law to encourage the development of more affordable units. Under current law, a city or county must grant a density bonus, concessions and incentives, prescribed parking requirements, as well as waivers of development standards upon a developer's request when the developer includes a certain percentage of affordable housing in a housing development project. This bill would amend density bonus law to allow developers that agree to either include a percentage of affordable units or where the development is 100% affordable to lower income families and individuals to request a city or county reduce or eliminate parking ratios. Cost of parking spaces: AB 744 Page 5 Affordable housing is expensive to build in California due to both the amount of subsidy needed to make the housing affordable and the cost of local regulatory requirements. In some cases, cities and counties apply minimum parking standards to housing developments that may not reflect the demand from tenants for parking. These projects may be close to transit stations or home to seniors or individuals with special needs who drive less frequently and have fewer vehicles. Parking spaces, which sometimes go unused, can significantly increase the cost of construction. The average construction cost per space, excluding land cost, in a parking structure in the United States is $24,000 for aboveground parking and $34,000 for underground parking. Certain types of parking, podium or subterranean, can increase parking costs by 6% or more relative to other types of parking. This bill would require cities or counties to waive the minimum parking ratio for developments that are solely for lower-income tenants. These projects would have to be either close to major transit, for seniors who are 62 years or older, or for special needs populations. Developments that are solely affordable to low-income tenants typically require Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) to finance the project. To compete for LIHTC, projects needs to meet scoring criteria including proximity to transit. Although projects that are senior or special needs are not required to meet the standard that they are within one-half mile of major transit they will need to meet the transit requirements of the LIHTC. Parking study: This bill would allow a city or county to impose a higher parking ratio than then those outlined in this bill if the city has conducted a study within the last five years that includes substantial evidence that supports the need for a higher parking ratio. The city could only increase the parking ratio to the AB 744 Page 6 existing standard that is allowed under Density Bonus Law. This provision was included to address concerns raised by cities who argued they needed a means to increase parking beyond the requirements of this bill. Sustainable development goals: California has taken steps over the last several years to establish programs and policies to help incentivize regional and local planning efforts. AB 32 (Núñez), Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006: The California Global Solutions Act of 2006 requires California to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. SB 375 (Steinberg), Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008, supports the state's climate action goals to reduce GHG emissions through coordinated transportation and land use planning with the goal of more sustainable communities. A key component of reducing GHG emissions is moving people out of their cars and onto public transit. Cities and counties are required to adopt sustainable community strategies to show how development will support reduction in GHG emissions. Purpose of this bill: According to the author, this bill would reduce a local barrier to building affordable housing by requiring a city or county and an affordable housing developer to negotiate the appropriate parking ratio rather than relying upon a standard that does not make sense for the development or the tenants living in the development. Much of California's existing parking requirements are based on low-density and single-purpose land use designations. Parking is costly to build and maintain and can increase the cost of projects in existing development areas. AB 744 Page 7 Analysis Prepared by: Lisa Engel / H. & C.D. / (916) 319-2085 FN: 0000876