BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 749


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 6, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          749 (Bloom) - As Amended April 16, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Judiciary                      |Vote:|7 - 3        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill requires that an official court reporter take down in  
          shorthand all testimony and all statements and remarks of judges  
          and all persons appearing at child custody and Domestic Violence  
          Prevention Act proceedings.








                                                                     AB 749


                                                                    Page  2







          FISCAL EFFECT:


          The Judicial Council indicates that 26 counties currently are  
          not providing court reporters in family law proceedings.  
          Assuming each of these counties, on average, would have to hire  
          one full-time court reporter at an average annual cost of  
          $100,000 for salary and benefits, statewide costs would be $2.6  
          million. [Trial Court Trust Fund]


          (The Judicial Council notes that family law calendars are not  
          organized to group child custody and domestic violence hearings  
          apart from other family law cases.


          COMMENTS:


          Background and Purpose. Court reporters take shorthand notes of  
          court proceedings and produce a verbatim record of what  
          transpires in court.  Today court reporters are only mandated in  
          some court proceedings, generally criminal and juvenile court  
          proceedings.  The lack of mandate for court reporters in civil  
          actions coupled with budget cuts to the courts has resulted in  
          many civil courtrooms across the state operating without court  
          reporters, unless the parties decide to provide and pay for  
          their own reporters.  In family law cases, where life-altering  
          decisions are made every day and the vast majority of litigants  
          are unrepresented, court reporters are almost nonexistent.   
          Without a court reporter to take down the proceedings, there is  
          no report of what transpires in court.  As a result, parties may  
          be unable to draft orders accurately, and there is effectively  
          no right to appeal.  This bill mandates that court reporters  
          take down all proceedings in child custody and domestic violence  
          cases.









                                                                     AB 749


                                                                    Page  3






          In preparing for an informational hearing in February 2013  
          intended to identify and better understand the impacts of budget  
          reductions on the trial courts, the Assembly Judiciary Committee  
          independently surveyed the 58 trial courts to assess what  
          measures had been taken to address the cuts. The committee  
          discovered that fully 30 courts had ceased providing court  
          reporters for civil, family and probate proceedings.  In those  
          courts, parties who wish to have an official record of  
          proceedings must hire and pay the substantial cost of providing  
          their own private court reporter.


          Analysis Prepared by:Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081