BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 757


                                                                    Page  1





         Date of Hearing:  May 13, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


         AB  
         757 (Gomez) - As Amended April 30, 2015


          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         |Policy       |Business and Professions       |Vote:|14 - 0       |
         |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


         Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  YesReimbursable:  No


         SUMMARY:


         This bill carves out a narrow exemption from rules governing  
         which laboratory personnel can perform moderate complexity tests,  
         to authorize a medical assistant who meets specified criteria to  
         perform a total protein refractometer test analysis in a licensed  








                                                                     AB 757


                                                                    Page  2





         plasma collection facility in this state.


         FISCAL EFFECT:


         Negligible state fiscal effect. 


         COMMENTS:


         1)Purpose. The author states this bill will help promote  
           efficiencies, where appropriate, in the biomedical industry  
           while continuing to prioritize patient health and safety.  He  
           contends the test addressed in this bill is a standard, mostly  
           automated procedure performed during donor intake and  
           assessment to determine donor eligibility for plasma donation.


         2)Background.  Federal and state law jointly govern the provision  
           of laboratory services, and California Department of Public  
           Health regulates laboratories on behalf of the state and  
           federal government.  The statute Clinical Laboratory  
           Improvement Amendments (CLIA), is the federal framework for  
           laboratory oversight.  Under federal CLIA, tests are classified  
           as either waived, moderate-complexity, or high-complexity.  
           Waived tests are simple and low-risk, while moderate- and  
           high-complexity tests are subject to more stringent regulation.  
           Existing law authorizes certain exceptions from normal rules  
           governing which professionals can conduct certain tests.   
           Medical assistants are not licensed, although they are  
           supervised on-site by physicians and can be certified by  
           private agencies approved by the Medical Board of California.  


         3)Support. According to Grifols, Inc., the sponsor of this  
           measure, a total protein refractometer test can be administered  
           in 48 states by a trained healthcare professional equivalent to  








                                                                     AB 757


                                                                    Page  3





           what California defines as a medical assistant.  The Blood  
           Centers of California are also in support.


         4)Opposition. California Association for Medical Laboratory  
           Technology, California Society of Pathologists, and Engineers &  
           Scientists of California, IFPTE Local 20 oppose this bill,  
           arguing exemptions undermine test result integrity and  
           protection for patients.  They explain that although the test  
           may be simple, calibration needs to be conducted by qualified  
           personnel.


         Analysis Prepared by:Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916)  
         319-2081